THE RESPONSE OF LETTUCE TO FLUORESCENT LIGHT AND LED LIGHT RELATIVE TO DIFFERENT NITROGEN NUTRITION OF PLANTS

In two successive pot experiments with lettuce cv. ‘Królowa Majowych’, conducted in a phytotron, this study investigated the effect of cool white fluorescent light (FRS) at a PPFD 200 μmol·m-2·s-1 and red-blue LED light at a PPFD of 200 and 800 μmol·m-2·s-1 on photosynthesis, yield, leaf area, SLA,...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Edward Borowski, Barbara Hawrylak-Nowak, Sławomir Michałek
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: University of Life Sciences in Lublin - Publishing House 2014-10-01
Series:Acta Scientiarum Polonorum: Hortorum Cultus
Subjects:
Online Access:https://czasopisma.up.lublin.pl/index.php/asphc/article/view/2808
_version_ 1797393995886755840
author Edward Borowski
Barbara Hawrylak-Nowak
Sławomir Michałek
author_facet Edward Borowski
Barbara Hawrylak-Nowak
Sławomir Michałek
author_sort Edward Borowski
collection DOAJ
description In two successive pot experiments with lettuce cv. ‘Królowa Majowych’, conducted in a phytotron, this study investigated the effect of cool white fluorescent light (FRS) at a PPFD 200 μmol·m-2·s-1 and red-blue LED light at a PPFD of 200 and 800 μmol·m-2·s-1 on photosynthesis, yield, leaf area, SLA, and the content of photosynthetic pigments, total N and nitrates. Experimental plants were grown in sphagnum peat supplemented with full-strength Hoagland’s solution at the beginning of the experiment. 10 days after plants were pricked out, 4 experimental series were made which differed in the form of N supplied to the growing medium at a rate of 420 mg (2N): 1) Hoagland’s solution (control); 2) Hoagl + 2N-NO3; 3) Hoagl + 2N-NH4; 4) Hoagl + 2N-NH4/NO3. The obtained results showed that the lettuce leaf yield under FRS light was distinctly higher than under LED light at a PPFD of 200, and in particular at 800 μmol·m-2·s-1. Besides, the leaves grown under FRS light showed a significantly thinner leaf blade (SLA) and a lower content of photosynthetic pigments, total N and nitrates. The photosynthetic rate was higher under LED light relative to FRS light. Different nutrition of plants with N-NO3, N-NH4 and N-NH4/NO3 had a similar effect on the yield and analysed traits of lettuce leaves, regardless of the type of light and the level of irradiation with LED light. LED lamps seem to be a very promising light source for plants, but they require further research on how to adapt the spectral distribution of light to their requirements.
first_indexed 2024-03-09T00:13:01Z
format Article
id doaj.art-4fe8c9307354411ebfa2e4d84ee94d70
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1644-0692
2545-1405
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-09T00:13:01Z
publishDate 2014-10-01
publisher University of Life Sciences in Lublin - Publishing House
record_format Article
series Acta Scientiarum Polonorum: Hortorum Cultus
spelling doaj.art-4fe8c9307354411ebfa2e4d84ee94d702023-12-12T09:48:23ZengUniversity of Life Sciences in Lublin - Publishing HouseActa Scientiarum Polonorum: Hortorum Cultus1644-06922545-14052014-10-01135THE RESPONSE OF LETTUCE TO FLUORESCENT LIGHT AND LED LIGHT RELATIVE TO DIFFERENT NITROGEN NUTRITION OF PLANTSEdward BorowskiBarbara Hawrylak-NowakSławomir Michałek In two successive pot experiments with lettuce cv. ‘Królowa Majowych’, conducted in a phytotron, this study investigated the effect of cool white fluorescent light (FRS) at a PPFD 200 μmol·m-2·s-1 and red-blue LED light at a PPFD of 200 and 800 μmol·m-2·s-1 on photosynthesis, yield, leaf area, SLA, and the content of photosynthetic pigments, total N and nitrates. Experimental plants were grown in sphagnum peat supplemented with full-strength Hoagland’s solution at the beginning of the experiment. 10 days after plants were pricked out, 4 experimental series were made which differed in the form of N supplied to the growing medium at a rate of 420 mg (2N): 1) Hoagland’s solution (control); 2) Hoagl + 2N-NO3; 3) Hoagl + 2N-NH4; 4) Hoagl + 2N-NH4/NO3. The obtained results showed that the lettuce leaf yield under FRS light was distinctly higher than under LED light at a PPFD of 200, and in particular at 800 μmol·m-2·s-1. Besides, the leaves grown under FRS light showed a significantly thinner leaf blade (SLA) and a lower content of photosynthetic pigments, total N and nitrates. The photosynthetic rate was higher under LED light relative to FRS light. Different nutrition of plants with N-NO3, N-NH4 and N-NH4/NO3 had a similar effect on the yield and analysed traits of lettuce leaves, regardless of the type of light and the level of irradiation with LED light. LED lamps seem to be a very promising light source for plants, but they require further research on how to adapt the spectral distribution of light to their requirements. https://czasopisma.up.lublin.pl/index.php/asphc/article/view/2808spectral compositionLactuca sativayieldleaf areaSLAphotosynthetic pigments
spellingShingle Edward Borowski
Barbara Hawrylak-Nowak
Sławomir Michałek
THE RESPONSE OF LETTUCE TO FLUORESCENT LIGHT AND LED LIGHT RELATIVE TO DIFFERENT NITROGEN NUTRITION OF PLANTS
Acta Scientiarum Polonorum: Hortorum Cultus
spectral composition
Lactuca sativa
yield
leaf area
SLA
photosynthetic pigments
title THE RESPONSE OF LETTUCE TO FLUORESCENT LIGHT AND LED LIGHT RELATIVE TO DIFFERENT NITROGEN NUTRITION OF PLANTS
title_full THE RESPONSE OF LETTUCE TO FLUORESCENT LIGHT AND LED LIGHT RELATIVE TO DIFFERENT NITROGEN NUTRITION OF PLANTS
title_fullStr THE RESPONSE OF LETTUCE TO FLUORESCENT LIGHT AND LED LIGHT RELATIVE TO DIFFERENT NITROGEN NUTRITION OF PLANTS
title_full_unstemmed THE RESPONSE OF LETTUCE TO FLUORESCENT LIGHT AND LED LIGHT RELATIVE TO DIFFERENT NITROGEN NUTRITION OF PLANTS
title_short THE RESPONSE OF LETTUCE TO FLUORESCENT LIGHT AND LED LIGHT RELATIVE TO DIFFERENT NITROGEN NUTRITION OF PLANTS
title_sort response of lettuce to fluorescent light and led light relative to different nitrogen nutrition of plants
topic spectral composition
Lactuca sativa
yield
leaf area
SLA
photosynthetic pigments
url https://czasopisma.up.lublin.pl/index.php/asphc/article/view/2808
work_keys_str_mv AT edwardborowski theresponseoflettucetofluorescentlightandledlightrelativetodifferentnitrogennutritionofplants
AT barbarahawrylaknowak theresponseoflettucetofluorescentlightandledlightrelativetodifferentnitrogennutritionofplants
AT sławomirmichałek theresponseoflettucetofluorescentlightandledlightrelativetodifferentnitrogennutritionofplants
AT edwardborowski responseoflettucetofluorescentlightandledlightrelativetodifferentnitrogennutritionofplants
AT barbarahawrylaknowak responseoflettucetofluorescentlightandledlightrelativetodifferentnitrogennutritionofplants
AT sławomirmichałek responseoflettucetofluorescentlightandledlightrelativetodifferentnitrogennutritionofplants