Vessel-Sparing Lymphadenectomy Should Be Performed in Small Intestine Neuroendocrine Neoplasms

Introduction: The goal of primary tumor resection with lymphadenectomy (PTR) in small intestine neuroendocrine neoplasms (SI-NENs) is to avoid local recurrence while sparing as much of the small bowel as possible, even in the case of extensive mesenteric fibrosis. The results of PTR with retrograde...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Detlef K. Bartsch, Sebastian Windel, Veit Kanngießer, Moritz Jesinghaus, Katharina Holzer, Anja Rinke, Elisabeth Maurer
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2022-07-01
Series:Cancers
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/2072-6694/14/15/3610
_version_ 1797442633122971648
author Detlef K. Bartsch
Sebastian Windel
Veit Kanngießer
Moritz Jesinghaus
Katharina Holzer
Anja Rinke
Elisabeth Maurer
author_facet Detlef K. Bartsch
Sebastian Windel
Veit Kanngießer
Moritz Jesinghaus
Katharina Holzer
Anja Rinke
Elisabeth Maurer
author_sort Detlef K. Bartsch
collection DOAJ
description Introduction: The goal of primary tumor resection with lymphadenectomy (PTR) in small intestine neuroendocrine neoplasms (SI-NENs) is to avoid local recurrence while sparing as much of the small bowel as possible, even in the case of extensive mesenteric fibrosis. The results of PTR with retrograde vessel-sparing lymphadenectomy (VS-LA) were compared to those of conventional lymphadenectomy (Con-LA). Methods: Prospectively collected clinical, surgical and pathological data of consecutive patients with SI-NENs who underwent small bowel resections were retrospectively analyzed regarding the resection technique performed. Results: In a 7-year period, 50 of 102 patients with SI-NENs had only small bowel resections; of those, 25 were VS-LA and 25 were Con-LA. Patients with VS-LA had tendentially more advanced diseases with slightly higher rates of abdominal pain, mesenteric shrinkage and more level III lymph node involvement compared to patients with Con-LA. VS-LA, however, resulted in shorter resected bowel segments (median 40 cm vs. 65 cm, <i>p</i> = 0.007) with similar rates of local R0 resections (72% vs. 84%) and resected lymph nodes (median 13 vs. 13). Postoperative clinically relevant complications occurred in 1 of 25 (4%) in the VS-LA and in 7 of 25 (28%) patients in the Con-LA group (<i>p</i> = 0.02). Three months after surgery, 1 of 25 (4%) patients of the VS-LA group and 10 of 25 (40%) patients in the Con-LA group (<i>p</i> = 0.002) complained about abdominal pain. One of eight patients in the VS-LA group and two of thirteen patients in the Con-LA group who had completely resected stage III disease complained about diarrhea (<i>p</i> = 0.31). Conclusion: VS-LA seems to be oncologically safe and should be considered in small bowel resections for SI-NENs.
first_indexed 2024-03-09T12:44:46Z
format Article
id doaj.art-4fe998971582452f946ddc0951334bde
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2072-6694
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-09T12:44:46Z
publishDate 2022-07-01
publisher MDPI AG
record_format Article
series Cancers
spelling doaj.art-4fe998971582452f946ddc0951334bde2023-11-30T22:13:12ZengMDPI AGCancers2072-66942022-07-011415361010.3390/cancers14153610Vessel-Sparing Lymphadenectomy Should Be Performed in Small Intestine Neuroendocrine NeoplasmsDetlef K. Bartsch0Sebastian Windel1Veit Kanngießer2Moritz Jesinghaus3Katharina Holzer4Anja Rinke5Elisabeth Maurer6Department of Visceral-, Thoracic- and Vascular Surgery, Philipps-University Marburg, Baldingerstraße, 35043 Marburg, GermanyDepartment of Visceral-, Thoracic- and Vascular Surgery, Philipps-University Marburg, Baldingerstraße, 35043 Marburg, GermanyDepartment of Visceral-, Thoracic- and Vascular Surgery, Philipps-University Marburg, Baldingerstraße, 35043 Marburg, GermanyInstitute of Pathology, Philipps-University Marburg, Baldingerstraße, 35043 Marburg, GermanyDepartment of Visceral-, Thoracic- and Vascular Surgery, Philipps-University Marburg, Baldingerstraße, 35043 Marburg, GermanyDepartment of Gastroenterology and Endocrinology, Philipps-University Marburg, Baldingerstraße, 35043 Marburg, GermanyDepartment of Visceral-, Thoracic- and Vascular Surgery, Philipps-University Marburg, Baldingerstraße, 35043 Marburg, GermanyIntroduction: The goal of primary tumor resection with lymphadenectomy (PTR) in small intestine neuroendocrine neoplasms (SI-NENs) is to avoid local recurrence while sparing as much of the small bowel as possible, even in the case of extensive mesenteric fibrosis. The results of PTR with retrograde vessel-sparing lymphadenectomy (VS-LA) were compared to those of conventional lymphadenectomy (Con-LA). Methods: Prospectively collected clinical, surgical and pathological data of consecutive patients with SI-NENs who underwent small bowel resections were retrospectively analyzed regarding the resection technique performed. Results: In a 7-year period, 50 of 102 patients with SI-NENs had only small bowel resections; of those, 25 were VS-LA and 25 were Con-LA. Patients with VS-LA had tendentially more advanced diseases with slightly higher rates of abdominal pain, mesenteric shrinkage and more level III lymph node involvement compared to patients with Con-LA. VS-LA, however, resulted in shorter resected bowel segments (median 40 cm vs. 65 cm, <i>p</i> = 0.007) with similar rates of local R0 resections (72% vs. 84%) and resected lymph nodes (median 13 vs. 13). Postoperative clinically relevant complications occurred in 1 of 25 (4%) in the VS-LA and in 7 of 25 (28%) patients in the Con-LA group (<i>p</i> = 0.02). Three months after surgery, 1 of 25 (4%) patients of the VS-LA group and 10 of 25 (40%) patients in the Con-LA group (<i>p</i> = 0.002) complained about abdominal pain. One of eight patients in the VS-LA group and two of thirteen patients in the Con-LA group who had completely resected stage III disease complained about diarrhea (<i>p</i> = 0.31). Conclusion: VS-LA seems to be oncologically safe and should be considered in small bowel resections for SI-NENs.https://www.mdpi.com/2072-6694/14/15/3610small intestine neuroendocrine neoplasmsprimary tumor resectionlymphadenectomyvessel-sparing
spellingShingle Detlef K. Bartsch
Sebastian Windel
Veit Kanngießer
Moritz Jesinghaus
Katharina Holzer
Anja Rinke
Elisabeth Maurer
Vessel-Sparing Lymphadenectomy Should Be Performed in Small Intestine Neuroendocrine Neoplasms
Cancers
small intestine neuroendocrine neoplasms
primary tumor resection
lymphadenectomy
vessel-sparing
title Vessel-Sparing Lymphadenectomy Should Be Performed in Small Intestine Neuroendocrine Neoplasms
title_full Vessel-Sparing Lymphadenectomy Should Be Performed in Small Intestine Neuroendocrine Neoplasms
title_fullStr Vessel-Sparing Lymphadenectomy Should Be Performed in Small Intestine Neuroendocrine Neoplasms
title_full_unstemmed Vessel-Sparing Lymphadenectomy Should Be Performed in Small Intestine Neuroendocrine Neoplasms
title_short Vessel-Sparing Lymphadenectomy Should Be Performed in Small Intestine Neuroendocrine Neoplasms
title_sort vessel sparing lymphadenectomy should be performed in small intestine neuroendocrine neoplasms
topic small intestine neuroendocrine neoplasms
primary tumor resection
lymphadenectomy
vessel-sparing
url https://www.mdpi.com/2072-6694/14/15/3610
work_keys_str_mv AT detlefkbartsch vesselsparinglymphadenectomyshouldbeperformedinsmallintestineneuroendocrineneoplasms
AT sebastianwindel vesselsparinglymphadenectomyshouldbeperformedinsmallintestineneuroendocrineneoplasms
AT veitkanngießer vesselsparinglymphadenectomyshouldbeperformedinsmallintestineneuroendocrineneoplasms
AT moritzjesinghaus vesselsparinglymphadenectomyshouldbeperformedinsmallintestineneuroendocrineneoplasms
AT katharinaholzer vesselsparinglymphadenectomyshouldbeperformedinsmallintestineneuroendocrineneoplasms
AT anjarinke vesselsparinglymphadenectomyshouldbeperformedinsmallintestineneuroendocrineneoplasms
AT elisabethmaurer vesselsparinglymphadenectomyshouldbeperformedinsmallintestineneuroendocrineneoplasms