Aerodynamic forces and flows of the full and partial clap-fling motions in insects

Most of the previous studies on Weis-Fogh clap-fling mechanism have focused on the vortex structures and velocity fields. Detailed pressure distribution results are provided for the first time in this study to reveal the differences between the full and the partial clap-fling motions. The two motion...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Xin Cheng, Mao Sun
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: PeerJ Inc. 2017-03-01
Series:PeerJ
Subjects:
Online Access:https://peerj.com/articles/3002.pdf
_version_ 1827606779429650432
author Xin Cheng
Mao Sun
author_facet Xin Cheng
Mao Sun
author_sort Xin Cheng
collection DOAJ
description Most of the previous studies on Weis-Fogh clap-fling mechanism have focused on the vortex structures and velocity fields. Detailed pressure distribution results are provided for the first time in this study to reveal the differences between the full and the partial clap-fling motions. The two motions are studied by numerically solving the Navier–Stokes equations in moving overset grids. The Reynolds number is set to 20, relevant to the tiny flying insects. The following has been shown: (1) During the clap phase, the wings clap together and create a high pressure region in the closing gap between wings, greatly increasing the positive pressure on the lower surface of wing, while pressure on the upper surface is almost unchanged by the interaction; during the fling phase, the wings fling apart and create a low pressure region in the opening gap between wings, greatly increasing the suction pressure on the upper surface of wing, while pressure on the lower surface is almost unchanged by the interaction; (2) The interference effect between wings is most severe at the end of clap phase and the start of the fling phase: two sharp force peaks (8–9 times larger than that of the one-winged case) are generated. But the total force peaks are manifested mostly as drag and barely as lift of the wing, owing to the vertical orientation of the wing section; (3) The wing–wing interaction effect in the partial clap-fling case is much weaker than that in the full clap-fling case, avoiding the generation of huge drag. Compared with a single wing flapping with the same motion, mean lift in the partial case is enhanced by 12% without suffering any efficiency degradation, indicating that partial clap-fling is a more practical choice for tiny insects to employ.
first_indexed 2024-03-09T06:44:15Z
format Article
id doaj.art-4ff8419c1ca5457296a49fa1246ad660
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2167-8359
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-09T06:44:15Z
publishDate 2017-03-01
publisher PeerJ Inc.
record_format Article
series PeerJ
spelling doaj.art-4ff8419c1ca5457296a49fa1246ad6602023-12-03T10:40:53ZengPeerJ Inc.PeerJ2167-83592017-03-015e300210.7717/peerj.3002Aerodynamic forces and flows of the full and partial clap-fling motions in insectsXin Cheng0Mao Sun1Institute of Fluid Mechanics, Beijing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics, Beijing, ChinaInstitute of Fluid Mechanics, Beijing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics, Beijing, ChinaMost of the previous studies on Weis-Fogh clap-fling mechanism have focused on the vortex structures and velocity fields. Detailed pressure distribution results are provided for the first time in this study to reveal the differences between the full and the partial clap-fling motions. The two motions are studied by numerically solving the Navier–Stokes equations in moving overset grids. The Reynolds number is set to 20, relevant to the tiny flying insects. The following has been shown: (1) During the clap phase, the wings clap together and create a high pressure region in the closing gap between wings, greatly increasing the positive pressure on the lower surface of wing, while pressure on the upper surface is almost unchanged by the interaction; during the fling phase, the wings fling apart and create a low pressure region in the opening gap between wings, greatly increasing the suction pressure on the upper surface of wing, while pressure on the lower surface is almost unchanged by the interaction; (2) The interference effect between wings is most severe at the end of clap phase and the start of the fling phase: two sharp force peaks (8–9 times larger than that of the one-winged case) are generated. But the total force peaks are manifested mostly as drag and barely as lift of the wing, owing to the vertical orientation of the wing section; (3) The wing–wing interaction effect in the partial clap-fling case is much weaker than that in the full clap-fling case, avoiding the generation of huge drag. Compared with a single wing flapping with the same motion, mean lift in the partial case is enhanced by 12% without suffering any efficiency degradation, indicating that partial clap-fling is a more practical choice for tiny insects to employ.https://peerj.com/articles/3002.pdfTiny insectsClap-flingwing–wing interactionNavier–Stokes simulation
spellingShingle Xin Cheng
Mao Sun
Aerodynamic forces and flows of the full and partial clap-fling motions in insects
PeerJ
Tiny insects
Clap-fling
wing–wing interaction
Navier–Stokes simulation
title Aerodynamic forces and flows of the full and partial clap-fling motions in insects
title_full Aerodynamic forces and flows of the full and partial clap-fling motions in insects
title_fullStr Aerodynamic forces and flows of the full and partial clap-fling motions in insects
title_full_unstemmed Aerodynamic forces and flows of the full and partial clap-fling motions in insects
title_short Aerodynamic forces and flows of the full and partial clap-fling motions in insects
title_sort aerodynamic forces and flows of the full and partial clap fling motions in insects
topic Tiny insects
Clap-fling
wing–wing interaction
Navier–Stokes simulation
url https://peerj.com/articles/3002.pdf
work_keys_str_mv AT xincheng aerodynamicforcesandflowsofthefullandpartialclapflingmotionsininsects
AT maosun aerodynamicforcesandflowsofthefullandpartialclapflingmotionsininsects