Providing longer post-fledging periods increases offspring survival at the expense of future fecundity.

The cost of reproduction is a key concept in life-history trade-offs. However, our understanding of the reproductive costs is biased towards measures of reproductive effort obtained before offspring independence. During the post-fledging dependence period (PFDP), it is well known that parents feed a...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: David López-Idiáquez, Pablo Vergara, Juan Antonio Fargallo, Jesús Martínez-Padilla
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Public Library of Science (PLoS) 2018-01-01
Series:PLoS ONE
Online Access:http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC6130873?pdf=render
_version_ 1819152940306268160
author David López-Idiáquez
Pablo Vergara
Juan Antonio Fargallo
Jesús Martínez-Padilla
author_facet David López-Idiáquez
Pablo Vergara
Juan Antonio Fargallo
Jesús Martínez-Padilla
author_sort David López-Idiáquez
collection DOAJ
description The cost of reproduction is a key concept in life-history trade-offs. However, our understanding of the reproductive costs is biased towards measures of reproductive effort obtained before offspring independence. During the post-fledging dependence period (PFDP), it is well known that parents feed and protect their offspring. However, the effort devoted to this reproductive activity has never been considered in the context of of the costs of reproduction. Moreover, the potential fitness benefits and costs for offspring and parents, respectively, of the duration of the PFDP are largely unknown. We estimated the duration of the PFDP over 5 years using wild common kestrels (Falco tinnunculus) and studied its association with survival probability and future parental reproductive performance. Our results show that longer PFDPs increase the survival probability of fledglings, probably due to the benefits obtained from parental care. In addition, we found that providing longer PFDPs was associated with reduced clutch sizes but not the number of fledglings in the subsequent breeding season in males. We suggest that increased parental expenditures on offspring during the PFDP may represent a potential cost of reproduction in breeding males.
first_indexed 2024-12-22T14:57:16Z
format Article
id doaj.art-5010058c600947cfb70c92b845569a6a
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1932-6203
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-22T14:57:16Z
publishDate 2018-01-01
publisher Public Library of Science (PLoS)
record_format Article
series PLoS ONE
spelling doaj.art-5010058c600947cfb70c92b845569a6a2022-12-21T18:22:12ZengPublic Library of Science (PLoS)PLoS ONE1932-62032018-01-01139e020315210.1371/journal.pone.0203152Providing longer post-fledging periods increases offspring survival at the expense of future fecundity.David López-IdiáquezPablo VergaraJuan Antonio FargalloJesús Martínez-PadillaThe cost of reproduction is a key concept in life-history trade-offs. However, our understanding of the reproductive costs is biased towards measures of reproductive effort obtained before offspring independence. During the post-fledging dependence period (PFDP), it is well known that parents feed and protect their offspring. However, the effort devoted to this reproductive activity has never been considered in the context of of the costs of reproduction. Moreover, the potential fitness benefits and costs for offspring and parents, respectively, of the duration of the PFDP are largely unknown. We estimated the duration of the PFDP over 5 years using wild common kestrels (Falco tinnunculus) and studied its association with survival probability and future parental reproductive performance. Our results show that longer PFDPs increase the survival probability of fledglings, probably due to the benefits obtained from parental care. In addition, we found that providing longer PFDPs was associated with reduced clutch sizes but not the number of fledglings in the subsequent breeding season in males. We suggest that increased parental expenditures on offspring during the PFDP may represent a potential cost of reproduction in breeding males.http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC6130873?pdf=render
spellingShingle David López-Idiáquez
Pablo Vergara
Juan Antonio Fargallo
Jesús Martínez-Padilla
Providing longer post-fledging periods increases offspring survival at the expense of future fecundity.
PLoS ONE
title Providing longer post-fledging periods increases offspring survival at the expense of future fecundity.
title_full Providing longer post-fledging periods increases offspring survival at the expense of future fecundity.
title_fullStr Providing longer post-fledging periods increases offspring survival at the expense of future fecundity.
title_full_unstemmed Providing longer post-fledging periods increases offspring survival at the expense of future fecundity.
title_short Providing longer post-fledging periods increases offspring survival at the expense of future fecundity.
title_sort providing longer post fledging periods increases offspring survival at the expense of future fecundity
url http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC6130873?pdf=render
work_keys_str_mv AT davidlopezidiaquez providinglongerpostfledgingperiodsincreasesoffspringsurvivalattheexpenseoffuturefecundity
AT pablovergara providinglongerpostfledgingperiodsincreasesoffspringsurvivalattheexpenseoffuturefecundity
AT juanantoniofargallo providinglongerpostfledgingperiodsincreasesoffspringsurvivalattheexpenseoffuturefecundity
AT jesusmartinezpadilla providinglongerpostfledgingperiodsincreasesoffspringsurvivalattheexpenseoffuturefecundity