Historical or Presuppositional Apologetics: A Henrecian Response to Michael Licona’s New Historiographical Approach

Two cross-currents from the twentieth century have affected evangelical apologetics: apologetic methodology and Carl F. H. Henry. Henry was considered the dean of American evangelicalism, who shaped the movement by providing a rational and propositional apologetic. Henry also engaged the issues in t...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Roach William C.
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Sciendo 2019-07-01
Series:Perichoresis: The Theological Journal of Emanuel University
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.2478/perc-2019-0021
_version_ 1819115352477401088
author Roach William C.
author_facet Roach William C.
author_sort Roach William C.
collection DOAJ
description Two cross-currents from the twentieth century have affected evangelical apologetics: apologetic methodology and Carl F. H. Henry. Henry was considered the dean of American evangelicalism, who shaped the movement by providing a rational and propositional apologetic. Henry also engaged the issues in the midst of a larger question of apologetic methodology, primarily, between presuppositionalists and evidentialists. This article continues to address the two cross-currents by offering a Henrecian evaluation of Michael Licona’s new historiographical approach to defending the resurrection. In particular, the article attempts to evaluate Licona’s evidentialist approach through the lens of Henry’s presuppositional approach.
first_indexed 2024-12-22T04:59:50Z
format Article
id doaj.art-5032feb9b05a492391578063ebae7735
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2284-7308
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-22T04:59:50Z
publishDate 2019-07-01
publisher Sciendo
record_format Article
series Perichoresis: The Theological Journal of Emanuel University
spelling doaj.art-5032feb9b05a492391578063ebae77352022-12-21T18:38:18ZengSciendoPerichoresis: The Theological Journal of Emanuel University2284-73082019-07-01173436110.2478/perc-2019-0021perc-2019-0021Historical or Presuppositional Apologetics: A Henrecian Response to Michael Licona’s New Historiographical ApproachRoach William C.0Southeastern Baptist Theological SeminaryTwo cross-currents from the twentieth century have affected evangelical apologetics: apologetic methodology and Carl F. H. Henry. Henry was considered the dean of American evangelicalism, who shaped the movement by providing a rational and propositional apologetic. Henry also engaged the issues in the midst of a larger question of apologetic methodology, primarily, between presuppositionalists and evidentialists. This article continues to address the two cross-currents by offering a Henrecian evaluation of Michael Licona’s new historiographical approach to defending the resurrection. In particular, the article attempts to evaluate Licona’s evidentialist approach through the lens of Henry’s presuppositional approach.https://doi.org/10.2478/perc-2019-0021carl f. h. henrymichael r. liconapresuppositionalismevidentialismmethodology
spellingShingle Roach William C.
Historical or Presuppositional Apologetics: A Henrecian Response to Michael Licona’s New Historiographical Approach
Perichoresis: The Theological Journal of Emanuel University
carl f. h. henry
michael r. licona
presuppositionalism
evidentialism
methodology
title Historical or Presuppositional Apologetics: A Henrecian Response to Michael Licona’s New Historiographical Approach
title_full Historical or Presuppositional Apologetics: A Henrecian Response to Michael Licona’s New Historiographical Approach
title_fullStr Historical or Presuppositional Apologetics: A Henrecian Response to Michael Licona’s New Historiographical Approach
title_full_unstemmed Historical or Presuppositional Apologetics: A Henrecian Response to Michael Licona’s New Historiographical Approach
title_short Historical or Presuppositional Apologetics: A Henrecian Response to Michael Licona’s New Historiographical Approach
title_sort historical or presuppositional apologetics a henrecian response to michael licona s new historiographical approach
topic carl f. h. henry
michael r. licona
presuppositionalism
evidentialism
methodology
url https://doi.org/10.2478/perc-2019-0021
work_keys_str_mv AT roachwilliamc historicalorpresuppositionalapologeticsahenrecianresponsetomichaelliconasnewhistoriographicalapproach