Induction of Labour in Prelabour Rupture of Membranes with or without Cervical Ripening with Prostaglandin E2

Objective: To compare the outcome of induction of labour with titrated dose of oxytocin with or without pre induction cervical ripening using prostaglandin E2. Methods: This is a prospective study. Sixty women with prelabour rupture of membranes (PROM) and Bishops score of less than six were rand...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Shreyashi Aryal, Chanda Karki
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Lumbini Medical College 2014-06-01
Series:Journal of Lumbini Medical College
Online Access:https://jlmc.edu.np/index.php/JLMC/article/view/46
_version_ 1818515934378196992
author Shreyashi Aryal
Chanda Karki
author_facet Shreyashi Aryal
Chanda Karki
author_sort Shreyashi Aryal
collection DOAJ
description Objective: To compare the outcome of induction of labour with titrated dose of oxytocin with or without pre induction cervical ripening using prostaglandin E2. Methods: This is a prospective study. Sixty women with prelabour rupture of membranes (PROM) and Bishops score of less than six were randomly assigned to either immediate induction with intravenous oxytocin drip or induction with intravenous oxytocin drip preceded by cervical priming with prostaglandin E2 (PGE2) gel 0.5mg instilled intracervically. These two groups were compared regarding the mode of delivery, induction to delivery interval and maternal and neonatal morbidities. Results: Cervical priming with PGE2 resulted in lesser number of caesarean section (5 Vs. 12) and lower incidence of meconium stained liquor (n=6 Vs. n=2). Induction to vaginal delivery interval was shorter when cervical priming was done (5.4 hrs Vs 7.9 hrs). The maternal morbidity was negligible (<1%) in both the groups. The number of neonates with birth asphyxia (n=2) and the need for their resuscitation (n=2) was more in the oxytocin group but the need of antibiotics for the neonates was more in PGE2 group (5% Vs. 3%). Conclusion: Induction of labor with oxytocin, with or without cervical priming with vaginal PGE2 gel, are both reasonable options in cases of PROM, since they result in statistically non significant rates of maternal and neonatal morbidities and caesarean section. Cervical priming with prostaglandin results in higher rate of vaginal delivery and shorter induction to vaginal delivery interval and this is viewed as an advantage to the mother.
first_indexed 2024-12-11T00:35:23Z
format Article
id doaj.art-5034d24f0de3491894194146fff08c4d
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2392-4632
2542-2618
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-11T00:35:23Z
publishDate 2014-06-01
publisher Lumbini Medical College
record_format Article
series Journal of Lumbini Medical College
spelling doaj.art-5034d24f0de3491894194146fff08c4d2022-12-22T01:27:10ZengLumbini Medical CollegeJournal of Lumbini Medical College2392-46322542-26182014-06-012110.22502/jlmc.v2i1.4646Induction of Labour in Prelabour Rupture of Membranes with or without Cervical Ripening with Prostaglandin E2Shreyashi Aryal0Chanda Karki1Lumbini Medical CollegeKathmandu Medical CollegeObjective: To compare the outcome of induction of labour with titrated dose of oxytocin with or without pre induction cervical ripening using prostaglandin E2. Methods: This is a prospective study. Sixty women with prelabour rupture of membranes (PROM) and Bishops score of less than six were randomly assigned to either immediate induction with intravenous oxytocin drip or induction with intravenous oxytocin drip preceded by cervical priming with prostaglandin E2 (PGE2) gel 0.5mg instilled intracervically. These two groups were compared regarding the mode of delivery, induction to delivery interval and maternal and neonatal morbidities. Results: Cervical priming with PGE2 resulted in lesser number of caesarean section (5 Vs. 12) and lower incidence of meconium stained liquor (n=6 Vs. n=2). Induction to vaginal delivery interval was shorter when cervical priming was done (5.4 hrs Vs 7.9 hrs). The maternal morbidity was negligible (<1%) in both the groups. The number of neonates with birth asphyxia (n=2) and the need for their resuscitation (n=2) was more in the oxytocin group but the need of antibiotics for the neonates was more in PGE2 group (5% Vs. 3%). Conclusion: Induction of labor with oxytocin, with or without cervical priming with vaginal PGE2 gel, are both reasonable options in cases of PROM, since they result in statistically non significant rates of maternal and neonatal morbidities and caesarean section. Cervical priming with prostaglandin results in higher rate of vaginal delivery and shorter induction to vaginal delivery interval and this is viewed as an advantage to the mother.https://jlmc.edu.np/index.php/JLMC/article/view/46
spellingShingle Shreyashi Aryal
Chanda Karki
Induction of Labour in Prelabour Rupture of Membranes with or without Cervical Ripening with Prostaglandin E2
Journal of Lumbini Medical College
title Induction of Labour in Prelabour Rupture of Membranes with or without Cervical Ripening with Prostaglandin E2
title_full Induction of Labour in Prelabour Rupture of Membranes with or without Cervical Ripening with Prostaglandin E2
title_fullStr Induction of Labour in Prelabour Rupture of Membranes with or without Cervical Ripening with Prostaglandin E2
title_full_unstemmed Induction of Labour in Prelabour Rupture of Membranes with or without Cervical Ripening with Prostaglandin E2
title_short Induction of Labour in Prelabour Rupture of Membranes with or without Cervical Ripening with Prostaglandin E2
title_sort induction of labour in prelabour rupture of membranes with or without cervical ripening with prostaglandin e2
url https://jlmc.edu.np/index.php/JLMC/article/view/46
work_keys_str_mv AT shreyashiaryal inductionoflabourinprelabourruptureofmembraneswithorwithoutcervicalripeningwithprostaglandine2
AT chandakarki inductionoflabourinprelabourruptureofmembraneswithorwithoutcervicalripeningwithprostaglandine2