Early singers attend to conspecific but not heterospecific behavioural cues at dawn

During the dawn chorus songbirds initiate singing activities just prior to sunrise. Environmental factors affect the timing of the dawn chorus, but relatively little is known about how behavioural cues influence chorus timing. We assessed whether early playback of conspecific and heterospecific song...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: L. Hodgson, J. R. Waas, J. R. Foote
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wiley 2018-07-01
Series:Journal of Avian Biology
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1111/jav.01749
_version_ 1797974548439629824
author L. Hodgson
J. R. Waas
J. R. Foote
author_facet L. Hodgson
J. R. Waas
J. R. Foote
author_sort L. Hodgson
collection DOAJ
description During the dawn chorus songbirds initiate singing activities just prior to sunrise. Environmental factors affect the timing of the dawn chorus, but relatively little is known about how behavioural cues influence chorus timing. We assessed whether early playback of conspecific and heterospecific song influenced chorus start times in two early‐singing temperate species, hermit thrush Catharus guttatus and veery C. fuscescens. We used arrays of GPS time‐synchronized recorders to record the dawn chorus at 30 locations. In each location, thirty minutes prior to natural chorus initiation, we broadcast: 1) an early singing species (hermit thrush or veery), 2) a late singing species (black‐throated green warbler Setophaga virens or Nashville warbler Oreothlypis ruficapilla), 3) a noise control, and 4) also recorded without playback (silent control). Playback treatments were separated by two‐three days at each location. Both hermit thrush and veery sang significantly earlier in response to conspecific playback compared to noise or silent controls. Both species also sang earlier in response to conspecific playback compared to the day before or the day after playback. Neither species sang earlier in response to heterospecific playback (regardless of whether the broadcast species was a naturally early or late song initiator) compared to noise or silent controls. Our results support the theory that the dawn chorus is a communication network where individuals attend primarily to conspecific cues; heterospecific song appears to have minimal impacts on the chorus start times of the two early‐singing species we investigated.
first_indexed 2024-04-11T04:21:32Z
format Article
id doaj.art-50374ebc6c504f09bb60752bb2138179
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 0908-8857
1600-048X
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-11T04:21:32Z
publishDate 2018-07-01
publisher Wiley
record_format Article
series Journal of Avian Biology
spelling doaj.art-50374ebc6c504f09bb60752bb21381792022-12-30T15:15:41ZengWileyJournal of Avian Biology0908-88571600-048X2018-07-01497n/an/a10.1111/jav.01749Early singers attend to conspecific but not heterospecific behavioural cues at dawnL. Hodgson0J. R. Waas1J. R. Foote2Dept of Biology Algoma Univ. Sault Ste Marie ON CanadaSchool of Sciences Univ. of Waikato Hamilton New ZealandDept of Biology Algoma Univ. Sault Ste Marie ON CanadaDuring the dawn chorus songbirds initiate singing activities just prior to sunrise. Environmental factors affect the timing of the dawn chorus, but relatively little is known about how behavioural cues influence chorus timing. We assessed whether early playback of conspecific and heterospecific song influenced chorus start times in two early‐singing temperate species, hermit thrush Catharus guttatus and veery C. fuscescens. We used arrays of GPS time‐synchronized recorders to record the dawn chorus at 30 locations. In each location, thirty minutes prior to natural chorus initiation, we broadcast: 1) an early singing species (hermit thrush or veery), 2) a late singing species (black‐throated green warbler Setophaga virens or Nashville warbler Oreothlypis ruficapilla), 3) a noise control, and 4) also recorded without playback (silent control). Playback treatments were separated by two‐three days at each location. Both hermit thrush and veery sang significantly earlier in response to conspecific playback compared to noise or silent controls. Both species also sang earlier in response to conspecific playback compared to the day before or the day after playback. Neither species sang earlier in response to heterospecific playback (regardless of whether the broadcast species was a naturally early or late song initiator) compared to noise or silent controls. Our results support the theory that the dawn chorus is a communication network where individuals attend primarily to conspecific cues; heterospecific song appears to have minimal impacts on the chorus start times of the two early‐singing species we investigated.https://doi.org/10.1111/jav.01749dawn chorusbehavioural cuesinterspecific communication
spellingShingle L. Hodgson
J. R. Waas
J. R. Foote
Early singers attend to conspecific but not heterospecific behavioural cues at dawn
Journal of Avian Biology
dawn chorus
behavioural cues
interspecific communication
title Early singers attend to conspecific but not heterospecific behavioural cues at dawn
title_full Early singers attend to conspecific but not heterospecific behavioural cues at dawn
title_fullStr Early singers attend to conspecific but not heterospecific behavioural cues at dawn
title_full_unstemmed Early singers attend to conspecific but not heterospecific behavioural cues at dawn
title_short Early singers attend to conspecific but not heterospecific behavioural cues at dawn
title_sort early singers attend to conspecific but not heterospecific behavioural cues at dawn
topic dawn chorus
behavioural cues
interspecific communication
url https://doi.org/10.1111/jav.01749
work_keys_str_mv AT lhodgson earlysingersattendtoconspecificbutnotheterospecificbehaviouralcuesatdawn
AT jrwaas earlysingersattendtoconspecificbutnotheterospecificbehaviouralcuesatdawn
AT jrfoote earlysingersattendtoconspecificbutnotheterospecificbehaviouralcuesatdawn