Development and validation of machine learning models for venous thromboembolism risk assessment at admission: a retrospective study

IntroductionVenous thromboembolism (VTE) risk assessment at admission is of great importance for early screening and timely prophylaxis and management during hospitalization. The purpose of this study is to develop and validate novel risk assessment models at admission based on machine learning (ML)...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Wenbo Sheng, Xiaoli Wang, Wenxiang Xu, Zedong Hao, Handong Ma, Shaodian Zhang
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Frontiers Media S.A. 2023-08-01
Series:Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fcvm.2023.1198526/full
_version_ 1797733123254910976
author Wenbo Sheng
Xiaoli Wang
Wenxiang Xu
Zedong Hao
Handong Ma
Shaodian Zhang
Shaodian Zhang
author_facet Wenbo Sheng
Xiaoli Wang
Wenxiang Xu
Zedong Hao
Handong Ma
Shaodian Zhang
Shaodian Zhang
author_sort Wenbo Sheng
collection DOAJ
description IntroductionVenous thromboembolism (VTE) risk assessment at admission is of great importance for early screening and timely prophylaxis and management during hospitalization. The purpose of this study is to develop and validate novel risk assessment models at admission based on machine learning (ML) methods.MethodsIn this retrospective study, a total of 3078 individuals were included with their Caprini variables within 24 hours at admission. Then several ML models were built, including logistic regression (LR), random forest (RF), and extreme gradient boosting (XGB). The prediction performance of ML models and the Caprini risk score (CRS) was then validated and compared through a series of evaluation metrics.ResultsThe values of AUROC and AUPRC were 0.798 and 0.303 for LR, 0.804 and 0.360 for RF, and 0.796 and 0.352 for XGB, respectively, which outperformed CRS significantly (0.714 and 0.180, P < 0.001). When prediction scores were stratified into three risk levels for application, RF could obtain more reasonable results than CRS, including smaller false positive alerts and larger lower-risk proportions. The boosting results of stratification were further verified by the net-reclassification-improvement (NRI) analysis.DiscussionThis study indicated that machine learning models could improve VTE risk prediction at admission compared with CRS. Among the ML models, RF was found to have superior performance and great potential in clinical practice.
first_indexed 2024-03-12T12:24:35Z
format Article
id doaj.art-503be12342e64e0b9f726fc82bc4ec25
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2297-055X
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-12T12:24:35Z
publishDate 2023-08-01
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format Article
series Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine
spelling doaj.art-503be12342e64e0b9f726fc82bc4ec252023-08-30T04:09:34ZengFrontiers Media S.A.Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine2297-055X2023-08-011010.3389/fcvm.2023.11985261198526Development and validation of machine learning models for venous thromboembolism risk assessment at admission: a retrospective studyWenbo Sheng0Xiaoli Wang1Wenxiang Xu2Zedong Hao3Handong Ma4Shaodian Zhang5Shaodian Zhang6Research and Development Department, Shanghai Synyi Medical Technology Co., Ltd., Shanghai, ChinaPudong Institute for Health Development, Shanghai, ChinaResearch and Development Department, Shanghai Synyi Medical Technology Co., Ltd., Shanghai, ChinaResearch and Development Department, Shanghai Synyi Medical Technology Co., Ltd., Shanghai, ChinaResearch and Development Department, Shanghai Synyi Medical Technology Co., Ltd., Shanghai, ChinaResearch and Development Department, Shanghai Synyi Medical Technology Co., Ltd., Shanghai, ChinaDivision of Medical Affairs, Shanghai Tenth People's Hospital, Shanghai, ChinaIntroductionVenous thromboembolism (VTE) risk assessment at admission is of great importance for early screening and timely prophylaxis and management during hospitalization. The purpose of this study is to develop and validate novel risk assessment models at admission based on machine learning (ML) methods.MethodsIn this retrospective study, a total of 3078 individuals were included with their Caprini variables within 24 hours at admission. Then several ML models were built, including logistic regression (LR), random forest (RF), and extreme gradient boosting (XGB). The prediction performance of ML models and the Caprini risk score (CRS) was then validated and compared through a series of evaluation metrics.ResultsThe values of AUROC and AUPRC were 0.798 and 0.303 for LR, 0.804 and 0.360 for RF, and 0.796 and 0.352 for XGB, respectively, which outperformed CRS significantly (0.714 and 0.180, P < 0.001). When prediction scores were stratified into three risk levels for application, RF could obtain more reasonable results than CRS, including smaller false positive alerts and larger lower-risk proportions. The boosting results of stratification were further verified by the net-reclassification-improvement (NRI) analysis.DiscussionThis study indicated that machine learning models could improve VTE risk prediction at admission compared with CRS. Among the ML models, RF was found to have superior performance and great potential in clinical practice.https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fcvm.2023.1198526/fullvenous thromboembolismrisk assessment modelmachine learningpredictive modelingrisk stratification
spellingShingle Wenbo Sheng
Xiaoli Wang
Wenxiang Xu
Zedong Hao
Handong Ma
Shaodian Zhang
Shaodian Zhang
Development and validation of machine learning models for venous thromboembolism risk assessment at admission: a retrospective study
Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine
venous thromboembolism
risk assessment model
machine learning
predictive modeling
risk stratification
title Development and validation of machine learning models for venous thromboembolism risk assessment at admission: a retrospective study
title_full Development and validation of machine learning models for venous thromboembolism risk assessment at admission: a retrospective study
title_fullStr Development and validation of machine learning models for venous thromboembolism risk assessment at admission: a retrospective study
title_full_unstemmed Development and validation of machine learning models for venous thromboembolism risk assessment at admission: a retrospective study
title_short Development and validation of machine learning models for venous thromboembolism risk assessment at admission: a retrospective study
title_sort development and validation of machine learning models for venous thromboembolism risk assessment at admission a retrospective study
topic venous thromboembolism
risk assessment model
machine learning
predictive modeling
risk stratification
url https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fcvm.2023.1198526/full
work_keys_str_mv AT wenbosheng developmentandvalidationofmachinelearningmodelsforvenousthromboembolismriskassessmentatadmissionaretrospectivestudy
AT xiaoliwang developmentandvalidationofmachinelearningmodelsforvenousthromboembolismriskassessmentatadmissionaretrospectivestudy
AT wenxiangxu developmentandvalidationofmachinelearningmodelsforvenousthromboembolismriskassessmentatadmissionaretrospectivestudy
AT zedonghao developmentandvalidationofmachinelearningmodelsforvenousthromboembolismriskassessmentatadmissionaretrospectivestudy
AT handongma developmentandvalidationofmachinelearningmodelsforvenousthromboembolismriskassessmentatadmissionaretrospectivestudy
AT shaodianzhang developmentandvalidationofmachinelearningmodelsforvenousthromboembolismriskassessmentatadmissionaretrospectivestudy
AT shaodianzhang developmentandvalidationofmachinelearningmodelsforvenousthromboembolismriskassessmentatadmissionaretrospectivestudy