Perturbações somatoformes - revisão da epidemiologia nos cuidados primários de saúde.

The prevalence of somatization is dependent on the classification methods and measures used to define it and the context from which the collected data are gathered. The aim of this study was to compare the prevalence of somatization and Somatoform Disorders (SFD) in Primary Health Care.A systematic...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Cristina Fabião, Maria Carolina Silva, Manuela Fleming, António Barbosa
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Ordem dos Médicos 2010-10-01
Series:Acta Médica Portuguesa
Online Access:https://www.actamedicaportuguesa.com/revista/index.php/amp/article/view/714
_version_ 1828106856352972800
author Cristina Fabião
Maria Carolina Silva
Manuela Fleming
António Barbosa
author_facet Cristina Fabião
Maria Carolina Silva
Manuela Fleming
António Barbosa
author_sort Cristina Fabião
collection DOAJ
description The prevalence of somatization is dependent on the classification methods and measures used to define it and the context from which the collected data are gathered. The aim of this study was to compare the prevalence of somatization and Somatoform Disorders (SFD) in Primary Health Care.A systematic review of the studies of the prevalence of somatization and SFD in PC (Primary Care) was made, from July 1998 to June 2009. The key words of this investigation, in Pub Med, were; somatoform disorders; somatization; somatisation; medically unexplained symptoms; MUS; functional somatic symptoms, the link with each of these key words having been made to Primary Care. A grid was drawn up for the selection of each article. The criteria for the inclusion of the studies took into account aspects related to the methodology and the instruments used (use of interview) and the clear definition of medically unexplained symptoms, amongst others.Twelve studies with prevalence values in a PC setting and 1 study of metaanalysis were selected. The values found for the total prevalence of SFD were extremely disperse, taking into consideration the various studies, being between 12% and 57.9%. The same results were found in relation to somatization disorder (between 0.5% and 16.1%) with 10.1%, referred to one study, following the very restrictive criteria of ICD-10. Results were more homogeneous for somatization defined by more abridged criteria, the Somatic Symptom Index 4.6 (SSI4,6) presenting values around 20% in almost the majority of selected studies that estimate the prevalence following this criteria. In the great majority of the studies, SFD increased the relative risk of other mental disorders (depressive and anxiety disorders). Some studies concluded that there was a relative independence of somatization in relation to those disorders, certified by the existence of a specific and cumulative effect of somatization (in relation to depressive and anxiety disorders) on the level of disability and of functional limitations as well as the level of use of resources in PC.This last decade has enabled a group of new studies that allow us to understand the extent of somatization in PC, especially in Europe and North America, and to have a more clearly based idea of the needs at service level and investigation level, within the referred area.
first_indexed 2024-04-11T10:23:38Z
format Article
id doaj.art-5052e090e8494a1da8d3e52af53fa175
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 0870-399X
1646-0758
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-11T10:23:38Z
publishDate 2010-10-01
publisher Ordem dos Médicos
record_format Article
series Acta Médica Portuguesa
spelling doaj.art-5052e090e8494a1da8d3e52af53fa1752022-12-22T04:29:39ZengOrdem dos MédicosActa Médica Portuguesa0870-399X1646-07582010-10-0123510.20344/amp.714Perturbações somatoformes - revisão da epidemiologia nos cuidados primários de saúde.Cristina Fabião0Maria Carolina SilvaManuela FlemingAntónio BarbosaDepartamento de Ciências do Comportamento, Instituto de Ciências Biomédicas Abel Salazar, Universidade do Porto, Porto.The prevalence of somatization is dependent on the classification methods and measures used to define it and the context from which the collected data are gathered. The aim of this study was to compare the prevalence of somatization and Somatoform Disorders (SFD) in Primary Health Care.A systematic review of the studies of the prevalence of somatization and SFD in PC (Primary Care) was made, from July 1998 to June 2009. The key words of this investigation, in Pub Med, were; somatoform disorders; somatization; somatisation; medically unexplained symptoms; MUS; functional somatic symptoms, the link with each of these key words having been made to Primary Care. A grid was drawn up for the selection of each article. The criteria for the inclusion of the studies took into account aspects related to the methodology and the instruments used (use of interview) and the clear definition of medically unexplained symptoms, amongst others.Twelve studies with prevalence values in a PC setting and 1 study of metaanalysis were selected. The values found for the total prevalence of SFD were extremely disperse, taking into consideration the various studies, being between 12% and 57.9%. The same results were found in relation to somatization disorder (between 0.5% and 16.1%) with 10.1%, referred to one study, following the very restrictive criteria of ICD-10. Results were more homogeneous for somatization defined by more abridged criteria, the Somatic Symptom Index 4.6 (SSI4,6) presenting values around 20% in almost the majority of selected studies that estimate the prevalence following this criteria. In the great majority of the studies, SFD increased the relative risk of other mental disorders (depressive and anxiety disorders). Some studies concluded that there was a relative independence of somatization in relation to those disorders, certified by the existence of a specific and cumulative effect of somatization (in relation to depressive and anxiety disorders) on the level of disability and of functional limitations as well as the level of use of resources in PC.This last decade has enabled a group of new studies that allow us to understand the extent of somatization in PC, especially in Europe and North America, and to have a more clearly based idea of the needs at service level and investigation level, within the referred area.https://www.actamedicaportuguesa.com/revista/index.php/amp/article/view/714
spellingShingle Cristina Fabião
Maria Carolina Silva
Manuela Fleming
António Barbosa
Perturbações somatoformes - revisão da epidemiologia nos cuidados primários de saúde.
Acta Médica Portuguesa
title Perturbações somatoformes - revisão da epidemiologia nos cuidados primários de saúde.
title_full Perturbações somatoformes - revisão da epidemiologia nos cuidados primários de saúde.
title_fullStr Perturbações somatoformes - revisão da epidemiologia nos cuidados primários de saúde.
title_full_unstemmed Perturbações somatoformes - revisão da epidemiologia nos cuidados primários de saúde.
title_short Perturbações somatoformes - revisão da epidemiologia nos cuidados primários de saúde.
title_sort perturbacoes somatoformes revisao da epidemiologia nos cuidados primarios de saude
url https://www.actamedicaportuguesa.com/revista/index.php/amp/article/view/714
work_keys_str_mv AT cristinafabiao perturbacoessomatoformesrevisaodaepidemiologianoscuidadosprimariosdesaude
AT mariacarolinasilva perturbacoessomatoformesrevisaodaepidemiologianoscuidadosprimariosdesaude
AT manuelafleming perturbacoessomatoformesrevisaodaepidemiologianoscuidadosprimariosdesaude
AT antoniobarbosa perturbacoessomatoformesrevisaodaepidemiologianoscuidadosprimariosdesaude