Faunal input at host plants: Can camel thorn trees use nutrients imported by resident sociable weavers?

Abstract “Islands of fertility” result from the focussing of water and nutrients around many shrub or tree species due to plants foraging for resources. Plant–animal feedbacks may amplify the development of such islands through environmental modification due to, for example, faunal deposition of nut...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Kervin D. Prayag, Carla J. duToit, Michael D. Cramer, Robert L. Thomson
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wiley 2020-10-01
Series:Ecology and Evolution
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1002/ece3.6798
_version_ 1798013786213318656
author Kervin D. Prayag
Carla J. duToit
Michael D. Cramer
Robert L. Thomson
author_facet Kervin D. Prayag
Carla J. duToit
Michael D. Cramer
Robert L. Thomson
author_sort Kervin D. Prayag
collection DOAJ
description Abstract “Islands of fertility” result from the focussing of water and nutrients around many shrub or tree species due to plants foraging for resources. Plant–animal feedbacks may amplify the development of such islands through environmental modification due to, for example, faunal deposition of nutrients and seeds. Fauna residing within vegetation clumps are likely to exert stronger feedbacks on their hosts than itinerant species. We studied the interaction between camel thorn trees (Vachellia erioloba) and the colonial nests of sociable weavers (Philetairus socius) in the Kalahari. We hypothesized that the accumulation of biological material below the nests will alter the nutrient status of the soil beneath the nest trees, in relation to unoccupied trees and the surrounding grassland. We also suggested that this association will have both positive and negative effects on the camel thorn trees. We found that soil concentrations of N, P, and K were, respectively, 4, 4.6, and 1.2 times higher below trees with nests compared to control trees, indicating faunal concentration of nutrients. Soil δ15N values were higher below trees with nests than below control trees without nests. Foliar δ15N values were also higher in nest trees than in control trees, showing the trees accessed faunally derived N. Furthermore, foliar biomass per diameter of terminal branches was 27% higher in nest trees, suggesting that trees respond to nutrient input from the weavers with increased growth. Large barren areas in the subcanopy vegetation directly beneath the colonies were attributed to decreased water infiltration rates, as a result of accumulation of organic matter due to continuous deposition of feces, possibly limiting competitive species from establishing in the subcanopy. On the other hand, canopy volume was reduced in trees with nests due to nests occupying large volumes within the canopy, and nests frequently causing branch fall, indicating costs associated with hosting weaver colonies. Synthesis: We found nutritional benefits to camel thorn trees when hosting sociable weaver colonies. These benefits can potentially overcome important environmental constraints, but these are partially offset by the resulting costs to the host trees.
first_indexed 2024-04-11T15:08:19Z
format Article
id doaj.art-5062a25549354026b284e39bd14ce8ea
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2045-7758
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-11T15:08:19Z
publishDate 2020-10-01
publisher Wiley
record_format Article
series Ecology and Evolution
spelling doaj.art-5062a25549354026b284e39bd14ce8ea2022-12-22T04:16:44ZengWileyEcology and Evolution2045-77582020-10-011020116431165610.1002/ece3.6798Faunal input at host plants: Can camel thorn trees use nutrients imported by resident sociable weavers?Kervin D. Prayag0Carla J. duToit1Michael D. Cramer2Robert L. Thomson3Department of Biological Sciences University of Cape Town Rondebosch South AfricaDepartment of Biological Sciences University of Cape Town Rondebosch South AfricaDepartment of Biological Sciences University of Cape Town Rondebosch South AfricaDepartment of Biological Sciences University of Cape Town Rondebosch South AfricaAbstract “Islands of fertility” result from the focussing of water and nutrients around many shrub or tree species due to plants foraging for resources. Plant–animal feedbacks may amplify the development of such islands through environmental modification due to, for example, faunal deposition of nutrients and seeds. Fauna residing within vegetation clumps are likely to exert stronger feedbacks on their hosts than itinerant species. We studied the interaction between camel thorn trees (Vachellia erioloba) and the colonial nests of sociable weavers (Philetairus socius) in the Kalahari. We hypothesized that the accumulation of biological material below the nests will alter the nutrient status of the soil beneath the nest trees, in relation to unoccupied trees and the surrounding grassland. We also suggested that this association will have both positive and negative effects on the camel thorn trees. We found that soil concentrations of N, P, and K were, respectively, 4, 4.6, and 1.2 times higher below trees with nests compared to control trees, indicating faunal concentration of nutrients. Soil δ15N values were higher below trees with nests than below control trees without nests. Foliar δ15N values were also higher in nest trees than in control trees, showing the trees accessed faunally derived N. Furthermore, foliar biomass per diameter of terminal branches was 27% higher in nest trees, suggesting that trees respond to nutrient input from the weavers with increased growth. Large barren areas in the subcanopy vegetation directly beneath the colonies were attributed to decreased water infiltration rates, as a result of accumulation of organic matter due to continuous deposition of feces, possibly limiting competitive species from establishing in the subcanopy. On the other hand, canopy volume was reduced in trees with nests due to nests occupying large volumes within the canopy, and nests frequently causing branch fall, indicating costs associated with hosting weaver colonies. Synthesis: We found nutritional benefits to camel thorn trees when hosting sociable weaver colonies. These benefits can potentially overcome important environmental constraints, but these are partially offset by the resulting costs to the host trees.https://doi.org/10.1002/ece3.6798Arid zone ecologyavian nutrient depositionecophysiologyecosystem engineershabitat heterogeneitynutrient cycling
spellingShingle Kervin D. Prayag
Carla J. duToit
Michael D. Cramer
Robert L. Thomson
Faunal input at host plants: Can camel thorn trees use nutrients imported by resident sociable weavers?
Ecology and Evolution
Arid zone ecology
avian nutrient deposition
ecophysiology
ecosystem engineers
habitat heterogeneity
nutrient cycling
title Faunal input at host plants: Can camel thorn trees use nutrients imported by resident sociable weavers?
title_full Faunal input at host plants: Can camel thorn trees use nutrients imported by resident sociable weavers?
title_fullStr Faunal input at host plants: Can camel thorn trees use nutrients imported by resident sociable weavers?
title_full_unstemmed Faunal input at host plants: Can camel thorn trees use nutrients imported by resident sociable weavers?
title_short Faunal input at host plants: Can camel thorn trees use nutrients imported by resident sociable weavers?
title_sort faunal input at host plants can camel thorn trees use nutrients imported by resident sociable weavers
topic Arid zone ecology
avian nutrient deposition
ecophysiology
ecosystem engineers
habitat heterogeneity
nutrient cycling
url https://doi.org/10.1002/ece3.6798
work_keys_str_mv AT kervindprayag faunalinputathostplantscancamelthorntreesusenutrientsimportedbyresidentsociableweavers
AT carlajdutoit faunalinputathostplantscancamelthorntreesusenutrientsimportedbyresidentsociableweavers
AT michaeldcramer faunalinputathostplantscancamelthorntreesusenutrientsimportedbyresidentsociableweavers
AT robertlthomson faunalinputathostplantscancamelthorntreesusenutrientsimportedbyresidentsociableweavers