The effect of nebulized heparin on clinical outcomes in mechanically ventilated patients: a meta-analysis and review of the literature

Objective To determine the relationship between use of nebulized heparin and clinical outcomes in mechanically ventilated patients. Methods The Medline, Embase, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, and PubMed databases were searched for relevant randomized controlled trials (RCTs), published between da...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Yi Zhang, Qiankun Li, Changan Sun, Yue Gu, Zhijiang Qi, Jun Li
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: SAGE Publishing 2023-10-01
Series:Journal of International Medical Research
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1177/03000605231201340
_version_ 1797662252387532800
author Yi Zhang
Qiankun Li
Changan Sun
Yue Gu
Zhijiang Qi
Jun Li
author_facet Yi Zhang
Qiankun Li
Changan Sun
Yue Gu
Zhijiang Qi
Jun Li
author_sort Yi Zhang
collection DOAJ
description Objective To determine the relationship between use of nebulized heparin and clinical outcomes in mechanically ventilated patients. Methods The Medline, Embase, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, and PubMed databases were searched for relevant randomized controlled trials (RCTs), published between database inception and May 2022. Primary outcomes were intensive care unit (ICU) length of stay and in-hospital mortality; secondary outcomes included duration of mechanical ventilation, ventilator-free days (VFDs) in 28 days, and length of hospitalization. The study protocol was registered on PROSPERO (registration No: CRD42022345533). Results A total of eight RCTs (651 patients) were included. Nebulized heparin was associated with reduced ICU length of stay (six studies; mean difference [MD] –1.10, 95% confidence interval [CI] –1.87, –0.33, I 2  = 76%), reduced duration of mechanical ventilation (two studies; MD –2.63, 95% CI –3.68, –1.58, I 2  = 92%) and increased VFDs in 28 days (two studies; MD 4.22, 95% CI 1.10, 7.35, I 2  = 18%), without increased incidence of adverse events, such as bleeding; but was not associated with a reduction in length of hospitalization (three studies; MD –1.00, 95% CI –2.90, –0.90, I 2  = 0%) or in-hospital mortality (five studies; odds ratio 1.10, 95% CI 0.69, 1.77, I 2  = 0%). Conclusion Nebulized heparin reduces ICU length of stay and duration of mechanical ventilation in mechanically ventilated patients, but has no effect on length of hospitalization or mortality.
first_indexed 2024-03-11T18:57:30Z
format Article
id doaj.art-5064642c9b27406a9fa0c92df9ee1fa9
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1473-2300
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-11T18:57:30Z
publishDate 2023-10-01
publisher SAGE Publishing
record_format Article
series Journal of International Medical Research
spelling doaj.art-5064642c9b27406a9fa0c92df9ee1fa92023-10-10T18:03:24ZengSAGE PublishingJournal of International Medical Research1473-23002023-10-015110.1177/03000605231201340The effect of nebulized heparin on clinical outcomes in mechanically ventilated patients: a meta-analysis and review of the literatureYi ZhangQiankun LiChangan SunYue GuZhijiang QiJun LiObjective To determine the relationship between use of nebulized heparin and clinical outcomes in mechanically ventilated patients. Methods The Medline, Embase, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, and PubMed databases were searched for relevant randomized controlled trials (RCTs), published between database inception and May 2022. Primary outcomes were intensive care unit (ICU) length of stay and in-hospital mortality; secondary outcomes included duration of mechanical ventilation, ventilator-free days (VFDs) in 28 days, and length of hospitalization. The study protocol was registered on PROSPERO (registration No: CRD42022345533). Results A total of eight RCTs (651 patients) were included. Nebulized heparin was associated with reduced ICU length of stay (six studies; mean difference [MD] –1.10, 95% confidence interval [CI] –1.87, –0.33, I 2  = 76%), reduced duration of mechanical ventilation (two studies; MD –2.63, 95% CI –3.68, –1.58, I 2  = 92%) and increased VFDs in 28 days (two studies; MD 4.22, 95% CI 1.10, 7.35, I 2  = 18%), without increased incidence of adverse events, such as bleeding; but was not associated with a reduction in length of hospitalization (three studies; MD –1.00, 95% CI –2.90, –0.90, I 2  = 0%) or in-hospital mortality (five studies; odds ratio 1.10, 95% CI 0.69, 1.77, I 2  = 0%). Conclusion Nebulized heparin reduces ICU length of stay and duration of mechanical ventilation in mechanically ventilated patients, but has no effect on length of hospitalization or mortality.https://doi.org/10.1177/03000605231201340
spellingShingle Yi Zhang
Qiankun Li
Changan Sun
Yue Gu
Zhijiang Qi
Jun Li
The effect of nebulized heparin on clinical outcomes in mechanically ventilated patients: a meta-analysis and review of the literature
Journal of International Medical Research
title The effect of nebulized heparin on clinical outcomes in mechanically ventilated patients: a meta-analysis and review of the literature
title_full The effect of nebulized heparin on clinical outcomes in mechanically ventilated patients: a meta-analysis and review of the literature
title_fullStr The effect of nebulized heparin on clinical outcomes in mechanically ventilated patients: a meta-analysis and review of the literature
title_full_unstemmed The effect of nebulized heparin on clinical outcomes in mechanically ventilated patients: a meta-analysis and review of the literature
title_short The effect of nebulized heparin on clinical outcomes in mechanically ventilated patients: a meta-analysis and review of the literature
title_sort effect of nebulized heparin on clinical outcomes in mechanically ventilated patients a meta analysis and review of the literature
url https://doi.org/10.1177/03000605231201340
work_keys_str_mv AT yizhang theeffectofnebulizedheparinonclinicaloutcomesinmechanicallyventilatedpatientsametaanalysisandreviewoftheliterature
AT qiankunli theeffectofnebulizedheparinonclinicaloutcomesinmechanicallyventilatedpatientsametaanalysisandreviewoftheliterature
AT changansun theeffectofnebulizedheparinonclinicaloutcomesinmechanicallyventilatedpatientsametaanalysisandreviewoftheliterature
AT yuegu theeffectofnebulizedheparinonclinicaloutcomesinmechanicallyventilatedpatientsametaanalysisandreviewoftheliterature
AT zhijiangqi theeffectofnebulizedheparinonclinicaloutcomesinmechanicallyventilatedpatientsametaanalysisandreviewoftheliterature
AT junli theeffectofnebulizedheparinonclinicaloutcomesinmechanicallyventilatedpatientsametaanalysisandreviewoftheliterature
AT yizhang effectofnebulizedheparinonclinicaloutcomesinmechanicallyventilatedpatientsametaanalysisandreviewoftheliterature
AT qiankunli effectofnebulizedheparinonclinicaloutcomesinmechanicallyventilatedpatientsametaanalysisandreviewoftheliterature
AT changansun effectofnebulizedheparinonclinicaloutcomesinmechanicallyventilatedpatientsametaanalysisandreviewoftheliterature
AT yuegu effectofnebulizedheparinonclinicaloutcomesinmechanicallyventilatedpatientsametaanalysisandreviewoftheliterature
AT zhijiangqi effectofnebulizedheparinonclinicaloutcomesinmechanicallyventilatedpatientsametaanalysisandreviewoftheliterature
AT junli effectofnebulizedheparinonclinicaloutcomesinmechanicallyventilatedpatientsametaanalysisandreviewoftheliterature