The Evolution of Biomineralization through the Co-Option of Organic Scaffold Forming Networks

Biomineralization is the process in which organisms use minerals to generate hard structures like teeth, skeletons and shells. Biomineralization is proposed to have evolved independently in different phyla through the co-option of pre-existing developmental programs. Comparing the gene regulatory ne...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Smadar Ben-Tabou de-Leon
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2022-02-01
Series:Cells
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/2073-4409/11/4/595
_version_ 1797481892957650944
author Smadar Ben-Tabou de-Leon
author_facet Smadar Ben-Tabou de-Leon
author_sort Smadar Ben-Tabou de-Leon
collection DOAJ
description Biomineralization is the process in which organisms use minerals to generate hard structures like teeth, skeletons and shells. Biomineralization is proposed to have evolved independently in different phyla through the co-option of pre-existing developmental programs. Comparing the gene regulatory networks (GRNs) that drive biomineralization in different species could illuminate the molecular evolution of biomineralization. Skeletogenesis in the sea urchin embryo was extensively studied and the underlying GRN shows high conservation within echinoderms, larval and adult skeletogenesis. The organic scaffold in which the calcite skeletal elements form in echinoderms is a tubular compartment generated by the syncytial skeletogenic cells. This is strictly different than the organic cartilaginous scaffold that vertebrates mineralize with hydroxyapatite to make their bones. Here I compare the GRNs that drive biomineralization and tubulogenesis in echinoderms and in vertebrates. The GRN that drives skeletogenesis in the sea urchin embryo shows little similarity to the GRN that drives bone formation and high resemblance to the GRN that drives vertebrates’ vascular tubulogenesis. On the other hand, vertebrates’ bone-GRNs show high similarity to the GRNs that operate in the cells that generate the cartilage-like tissues of basal chordate and invertebrates that do not produce mineralized tissue. These comparisons suggest that biomineralization in deuterostomes evolved through the phylum specific co-option of GRNs that control distinct organic scaffolds to mineralization.
first_indexed 2024-03-09T22:21:04Z
format Article
id doaj.art-50827864304a4c708c7771d7fcc83c9e
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2073-4409
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-09T22:21:04Z
publishDate 2022-02-01
publisher MDPI AG
record_format Article
series Cells
spelling doaj.art-50827864304a4c708c7771d7fcc83c9e2023-11-23T19:13:48ZengMDPI AGCells2073-44092022-02-0111459510.3390/cells11040595The Evolution of Biomineralization through the Co-Option of Organic Scaffold Forming NetworksSmadar Ben-Tabou de-Leon0Department of Marine Biology, Leon H. Charney School of Marine Sciences, University of Haifa, Haifa 31905, IsraelBiomineralization is the process in which organisms use minerals to generate hard structures like teeth, skeletons and shells. Biomineralization is proposed to have evolved independently in different phyla through the co-option of pre-existing developmental programs. Comparing the gene regulatory networks (GRNs) that drive biomineralization in different species could illuminate the molecular evolution of biomineralization. Skeletogenesis in the sea urchin embryo was extensively studied and the underlying GRN shows high conservation within echinoderms, larval and adult skeletogenesis. The organic scaffold in which the calcite skeletal elements form in echinoderms is a tubular compartment generated by the syncytial skeletogenic cells. This is strictly different than the organic cartilaginous scaffold that vertebrates mineralize with hydroxyapatite to make their bones. Here I compare the GRNs that drive biomineralization and tubulogenesis in echinoderms and in vertebrates. The GRN that drives skeletogenesis in the sea urchin embryo shows little similarity to the GRN that drives bone formation and high resemblance to the GRN that drives vertebrates’ vascular tubulogenesis. On the other hand, vertebrates’ bone-GRNs show high similarity to the GRNs that operate in the cells that generate the cartilage-like tissues of basal chordate and invertebrates that do not produce mineralized tissue. These comparisons suggest that biomineralization in deuterostomes evolved through the phylum specific co-option of GRNs that control distinct organic scaffolds to mineralization.https://www.mdpi.com/2073-4409/11/4/595gene regulatory networksevolutionbiomineralizationtubulogenesisskeletogenesisvascularization
spellingShingle Smadar Ben-Tabou de-Leon
The Evolution of Biomineralization through the Co-Option of Organic Scaffold Forming Networks
Cells
gene regulatory networks
evolution
biomineralization
tubulogenesis
skeletogenesis
vascularization
title The Evolution of Biomineralization through the Co-Option of Organic Scaffold Forming Networks
title_full The Evolution of Biomineralization through the Co-Option of Organic Scaffold Forming Networks
title_fullStr The Evolution of Biomineralization through the Co-Option of Organic Scaffold Forming Networks
title_full_unstemmed The Evolution of Biomineralization through the Co-Option of Organic Scaffold Forming Networks
title_short The Evolution of Biomineralization through the Co-Option of Organic Scaffold Forming Networks
title_sort evolution of biomineralization through the co option of organic scaffold forming networks
topic gene regulatory networks
evolution
biomineralization
tubulogenesis
skeletogenesis
vascularization
url https://www.mdpi.com/2073-4409/11/4/595
work_keys_str_mv AT smadarbentaboudeleon theevolutionofbiomineralizationthroughthecooptionoforganicscaffoldformingnetworks
AT smadarbentaboudeleon evolutionofbiomineralizationthroughthecooptionoforganicscaffoldformingnetworks