Two distinct phenotypes of immunologically hot gastric cancer subtypes

An in-depth understanding of the tumor microenvironment (TME) is required for the development of improved combination immunotherapies for gastric cancer. Recently, we classified these cancers into four main types defined by their immunological attributes, namely Hot 1, Hot 2, Intermediate and Cold....

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Noriyuki Saito, Yukari Kobayashi, Koji Nagaoka, Yoshihiro Kushihara, Yasuyoshi Sato, Ikuo Wada, Kazuhiro Kakimi, Yasuyuki Seto
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Elsevier 2021-12-01
Series:Biochemistry and Biophysics Reports
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2405580821002612
_version_ 1818353093410029568
author Noriyuki Saito
Yukari Kobayashi
Koji Nagaoka
Yoshihiro Kushihara
Yasuyoshi Sato
Ikuo Wada
Kazuhiro Kakimi
Yasuyuki Seto
author_facet Noriyuki Saito
Yukari Kobayashi
Koji Nagaoka
Yoshihiro Kushihara
Yasuyoshi Sato
Ikuo Wada
Kazuhiro Kakimi
Yasuyuki Seto
author_sort Noriyuki Saito
collection DOAJ
description An in-depth understanding of the tumor microenvironment (TME) is required for the development of improved combination immunotherapies for gastric cancer. Recently, we classified these cancers into four main types defined by their immunological attributes, namely Hot 1, Hot 2, Intermediate and Cold. Of these, the T cell-inflamed “Hot” tumors were further divided into Hot 1 and Hot 2 with different clinical outcomes. Thus, overall survival and progression-free survival of patients with Hot 1 tumors were shorter than with Hot 2. In the present study, we re-evaluated RNA-Seq data of 6 Hot 1 and 6 Hot 2 gastric cancers to elucidate the underlying reason for the poor prognosis and T cell dysfunction in the former. In addition, 56 Hot 1 and 27 Hot 2 tumors in The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) were analyzed. We report that single sample Gene Set Enrichment Analysis (ssGSEA) and differential gene expression analysis identified differences between Hot 1 and Hot 2 tumors involved in metabolism and cell adhesion pathways. Therefore, it is suggested that strategies to modulate active metabolism in Hot 1 tumors should be integrated into the treatment of these gastric cancers.
first_indexed 2024-12-13T19:04:03Z
format Article
id doaj.art-5083fbf3126d4e1a8af51c48ba6dc19f
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2405-5808
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-13T19:04:03Z
publishDate 2021-12-01
publisher Elsevier
record_format Article
series Biochemistry and Biophysics Reports
spelling doaj.art-5083fbf3126d4e1a8af51c48ba6dc19f2022-12-21T23:34:37ZengElsevierBiochemistry and Biophysics Reports2405-58082021-12-0128101167Two distinct phenotypes of immunologically hot gastric cancer subtypesNoriyuki Saito0Yukari Kobayashi1Koji Nagaoka2Yoshihiro Kushihara3Yasuyoshi Sato4Ikuo Wada5Kazuhiro Kakimi6Yasuyuki Seto7Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, The University of Tokyo Graduate School of Medicine, Tokyo 113-8655, JapanDepartment of Immunotherapeutics, The University of Tokyo Hospital, Tokyo 113-8655, JapanDepartment of Immunotherapeutics, The University of Tokyo Hospital, Tokyo 113-8655, JapanDepartment of Immunotherapeutics, The University of Tokyo Hospital, Tokyo 113-8655, JapanDepartment of Medical Oncology, The Cancer Institute Hospital of Japanese Foundation for Cancer Research, Tokyo 135-8550, JapanDepartment of Surgery, Tokyo Metropolitan Bokutoh Hospital, Tokyo 130-8575, JapanDepartment of Immunotherapeutics, The University of Tokyo Hospital, Tokyo 113-8655, Japan; Corresponding author. The University of Tokyo Hospital, 7-3-1 Hongo, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo, 113-8655, Japan.Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, The University of Tokyo Graduate School of Medicine, Tokyo 113-8655, JapanAn in-depth understanding of the tumor microenvironment (TME) is required for the development of improved combination immunotherapies for gastric cancer. Recently, we classified these cancers into four main types defined by their immunological attributes, namely Hot 1, Hot 2, Intermediate and Cold. Of these, the T cell-inflamed “Hot” tumors were further divided into Hot 1 and Hot 2 with different clinical outcomes. Thus, overall survival and progression-free survival of patients with Hot 1 tumors were shorter than with Hot 2. In the present study, we re-evaluated RNA-Seq data of 6 Hot 1 and 6 Hot 2 gastric cancers to elucidate the underlying reason for the poor prognosis and T cell dysfunction in the former. In addition, 56 Hot 1 and 27 Hot 2 tumors in The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) were analyzed. We report that single sample Gene Set Enrichment Analysis (ssGSEA) and differential gene expression analysis identified differences between Hot 1 and Hot 2 tumors involved in metabolism and cell adhesion pathways. Therefore, it is suggested that strategies to modulate active metabolism in Hot 1 tumors should be integrated into the treatment of these gastric cancers.http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2405580821002612Gastric cancerTumor immunityRNA-SeqT cell-inflamedHot tumor
spellingShingle Noriyuki Saito
Yukari Kobayashi
Koji Nagaoka
Yoshihiro Kushihara
Yasuyoshi Sato
Ikuo Wada
Kazuhiro Kakimi
Yasuyuki Seto
Two distinct phenotypes of immunologically hot gastric cancer subtypes
Biochemistry and Biophysics Reports
Gastric cancer
Tumor immunity
RNA-Seq
T cell-inflamed
Hot tumor
title Two distinct phenotypes of immunologically hot gastric cancer subtypes
title_full Two distinct phenotypes of immunologically hot gastric cancer subtypes
title_fullStr Two distinct phenotypes of immunologically hot gastric cancer subtypes
title_full_unstemmed Two distinct phenotypes of immunologically hot gastric cancer subtypes
title_short Two distinct phenotypes of immunologically hot gastric cancer subtypes
title_sort two distinct phenotypes of immunologically hot gastric cancer subtypes
topic Gastric cancer
Tumor immunity
RNA-Seq
T cell-inflamed
Hot tumor
url http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2405580821002612
work_keys_str_mv AT noriyukisaito twodistinctphenotypesofimmunologicallyhotgastriccancersubtypes
AT yukarikobayashi twodistinctphenotypesofimmunologicallyhotgastriccancersubtypes
AT kojinagaoka twodistinctphenotypesofimmunologicallyhotgastriccancersubtypes
AT yoshihirokushihara twodistinctphenotypesofimmunologicallyhotgastriccancersubtypes
AT yasuyoshisato twodistinctphenotypesofimmunologicallyhotgastriccancersubtypes
AT ikuowada twodistinctphenotypesofimmunologicallyhotgastriccancersubtypes
AT kazuhirokakimi twodistinctphenotypesofimmunologicallyhotgastriccancersubtypes
AT yasuyukiseto twodistinctphenotypesofimmunologicallyhotgastriccancersubtypes