Trade-off analyses between food provision and soil conservation service of Grain for Green Program in Mountainous Area

The Grain for Green Program and soil and water conservation engineering initiatives are crucial for controlling erosion in steep-slope agriculture. However, it is still unclear how these two management methods should be carried out in respect to the situation in mountainous areas. Therefore, taking...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Yawen Li, Yuxiang Li, Xingwu Duan, Zhongyin Cai, Ya Li, Baiyun He, Long Yin
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: KeAi Communications Co., Ltd. 2024-03-01
Series:International Soil and Water Conservation Research
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2095633923000370
_version_ 1797281054833246208
author Yawen Li
Yuxiang Li
Xingwu Duan
Zhongyin Cai
Ya Li
Baiyun He
Long Yin
author_facet Yawen Li
Yuxiang Li
Xingwu Duan
Zhongyin Cai
Ya Li
Baiyun He
Long Yin
author_sort Yawen Li
collection DOAJ
description The Grain for Green Program and soil and water conservation engineering initiatives are crucial for controlling erosion in steep-slope agriculture. However, it is still unclear how these two management methods should be carried out in respect to the situation in mountainous areas. Therefore, taking a typical mountainous area in southwest China as an example, we simulated six scenarios in order to compare the food provisioning service (FPS) and soil conservation service of the Grain for Green Program (converting to grassland) and Construction Measures (converting to sloping terrace) under different slopes. Results showed that when farmland with a >25° slope was converted into grassland, the amount of soil erosion (M) decreased by 21.0%, while FPS decreased by only 0.7%. However, when farmland with a >25° slope was converted into sloping terrace, M decreased by 31.3% while FPS increased by 18.7%. With the increases of farmland slope ranges in the Construction Measures scenario, M gradually decreased and FPS gradually increased. Particularly when farmland >15° was converted into sloping terrace, M decreased by 63.9% and FPS increased by 52.7%. Furthermore, the trade-offs of Construction Measures are lower than that of Grain for Green on different slope ranges. Therefore, we conclude that Construction Measures are a more suitable method in mountainous areas than the Grain for Green, and we suggest that further research be conducted to consider the ecological risks of construction engineering measures.
first_indexed 2024-03-07T16:50:59Z
format Article
id doaj.art-50853646279f4f0fbbb0f82b2044d346
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2095-6339
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-07T16:50:59Z
publishDate 2024-03-01
publisher KeAi Communications Co., Ltd.
record_format Article
series International Soil and Water Conservation Research
spelling doaj.art-50853646279f4f0fbbb0f82b2044d3462024-03-03T05:09:59ZengKeAi Communications Co., Ltd.International Soil and Water Conservation Research2095-63392024-03-011214353Trade-off analyses between food provision and soil conservation service of Grain for Green Program in Mountainous AreaYawen Li0Yuxiang Li1Xingwu Duan2Zhongyin Cai3Ya Li4Baiyun He5Long Yin6Institute of International River and Eco-security, Yunnan University, Kunming, 650091, PR ChinaInstitute of International River and Eco-security, Yunnan University, Kunming, 650091, PR ChinaInstitute of International River and Eco-security, Yunnan University, Kunming, 650091, PR China; Yunnan Key Laboratory of International Rivers and Trans-boundary Eco-security, Kunming, 650091, PR China; Corresponding author. Institute of International River and Eco-security, Yunnan University, Kunming, 650091, PR China.Institute of International River and Eco-security, Yunnan University, Kunming, 650091, PR China; Yunnan Key Laboratory of International Rivers and Trans-boundary Eco-security, Kunming, 650091, PR ChinaState Key Laboratory of Urban and Regional Ecology, Research Center for Eco-Environmental Sciences, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, 100085, PR China; University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, 100049, PR ChinaInstitute of International River and Eco-security, Yunnan University, Kunming, 650091, PR ChinaInstitute of International River and Eco-security, Yunnan University, Kunming, 650091, PR ChinaThe Grain for Green Program and soil and water conservation engineering initiatives are crucial for controlling erosion in steep-slope agriculture. However, it is still unclear how these two management methods should be carried out in respect to the situation in mountainous areas. Therefore, taking a typical mountainous area in southwest China as an example, we simulated six scenarios in order to compare the food provisioning service (FPS) and soil conservation service of the Grain for Green Program (converting to grassland) and Construction Measures (converting to sloping terrace) under different slopes. Results showed that when farmland with a >25° slope was converted into grassland, the amount of soil erosion (M) decreased by 21.0%, while FPS decreased by only 0.7%. However, when farmland with a >25° slope was converted into sloping terrace, M decreased by 31.3% while FPS increased by 18.7%. With the increases of farmland slope ranges in the Construction Measures scenario, M gradually decreased and FPS gradually increased. Particularly when farmland >15° was converted into sloping terrace, M decreased by 63.9% and FPS increased by 52.7%. Furthermore, the trade-offs of Construction Measures are lower than that of Grain for Green on different slope ranges. Therefore, we conclude that Construction Measures are a more suitable method in mountainous areas than the Grain for Green, and we suggest that further research be conducted to consider the ecological risks of construction engineering measures.http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2095633923000370Soil erosionGrain for greenConstruction measuresMountainous areas
spellingShingle Yawen Li
Yuxiang Li
Xingwu Duan
Zhongyin Cai
Ya Li
Baiyun He
Long Yin
Trade-off analyses between food provision and soil conservation service of Grain for Green Program in Mountainous Area
International Soil and Water Conservation Research
Soil erosion
Grain for green
Construction measures
Mountainous areas
title Trade-off analyses between food provision and soil conservation service of Grain for Green Program in Mountainous Area
title_full Trade-off analyses between food provision and soil conservation service of Grain for Green Program in Mountainous Area
title_fullStr Trade-off analyses between food provision and soil conservation service of Grain for Green Program in Mountainous Area
title_full_unstemmed Trade-off analyses between food provision and soil conservation service of Grain for Green Program in Mountainous Area
title_short Trade-off analyses between food provision and soil conservation service of Grain for Green Program in Mountainous Area
title_sort trade off analyses between food provision and soil conservation service of grain for green program in mountainous area
topic Soil erosion
Grain for green
Construction measures
Mountainous areas
url http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2095633923000370
work_keys_str_mv AT yawenli tradeoffanalysesbetweenfoodprovisionandsoilconservationserviceofgrainforgreenprograminmountainousarea
AT yuxiangli tradeoffanalysesbetweenfoodprovisionandsoilconservationserviceofgrainforgreenprograminmountainousarea
AT xingwuduan tradeoffanalysesbetweenfoodprovisionandsoilconservationserviceofgrainforgreenprograminmountainousarea
AT zhongyincai tradeoffanalysesbetweenfoodprovisionandsoilconservationserviceofgrainforgreenprograminmountainousarea
AT yali tradeoffanalysesbetweenfoodprovisionandsoilconservationserviceofgrainforgreenprograminmountainousarea
AT baiyunhe tradeoffanalysesbetweenfoodprovisionandsoilconservationserviceofgrainforgreenprograminmountainousarea
AT longyin tradeoffanalysesbetweenfoodprovisionandsoilconservationserviceofgrainforgreenprograminmountainousarea