Trade-off analyses between food provision and soil conservation service of Grain for Green Program in Mountainous Area
The Grain for Green Program and soil and water conservation engineering initiatives are crucial for controlling erosion in steep-slope agriculture. However, it is still unclear how these two management methods should be carried out in respect to the situation in mountainous areas. Therefore, taking...
Main Authors: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
KeAi Communications Co., Ltd.
2024-03-01
|
Series: | International Soil and Water Conservation Research |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2095633923000370 |
_version_ | 1797281054833246208 |
---|---|
author | Yawen Li Yuxiang Li Xingwu Duan Zhongyin Cai Ya Li Baiyun He Long Yin |
author_facet | Yawen Li Yuxiang Li Xingwu Duan Zhongyin Cai Ya Li Baiyun He Long Yin |
author_sort | Yawen Li |
collection | DOAJ |
description | The Grain for Green Program and soil and water conservation engineering initiatives are crucial for controlling erosion in steep-slope agriculture. However, it is still unclear how these two management methods should be carried out in respect to the situation in mountainous areas. Therefore, taking a typical mountainous area in southwest China as an example, we simulated six scenarios in order to compare the food provisioning service (FPS) and soil conservation service of the Grain for Green Program (converting to grassland) and Construction Measures (converting to sloping terrace) under different slopes. Results showed that when farmland with a >25° slope was converted into grassland, the amount of soil erosion (M) decreased by 21.0%, while FPS decreased by only 0.7%. However, when farmland with a >25° slope was converted into sloping terrace, M decreased by 31.3% while FPS increased by 18.7%. With the increases of farmland slope ranges in the Construction Measures scenario, M gradually decreased and FPS gradually increased. Particularly when farmland >15° was converted into sloping terrace, M decreased by 63.9% and FPS increased by 52.7%. Furthermore, the trade-offs of Construction Measures are lower than that of Grain for Green on different slope ranges. Therefore, we conclude that Construction Measures are a more suitable method in mountainous areas than the Grain for Green, and we suggest that further research be conducted to consider the ecological risks of construction engineering measures. |
first_indexed | 2024-03-07T16:50:59Z |
format | Article |
id | doaj.art-50853646279f4f0fbbb0f82b2044d346 |
institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
issn | 2095-6339 |
language | English |
last_indexed | 2024-03-07T16:50:59Z |
publishDate | 2024-03-01 |
publisher | KeAi Communications Co., Ltd. |
record_format | Article |
series | International Soil and Water Conservation Research |
spelling | doaj.art-50853646279f4f0fbbb0f82b2044d3462024-03-03T05:09:59ZengKeAi Communications Co., Ltd.International Soil and Water Conservation Research2095-63392024-03-011214353Trade-off analyses between food provision and soil conservation service of Grain for Green Program in Mountainous AreaYawen Li0Yuxiang Li1Xingwu Duan2Zhongyin Cai3Ya Li4Baiyun He5Long Yin6Institute of International River and Eco-security, Yunnan University, Kunming, 650091, PR ChinaInstitute of International River and Eco-security, Yunnan University, Kunming, 650091, PR ChinaInstitute of International River and Eco-security, Yunnan University, Kunming, 650091, PR China; Yunnan Key Laboratory of International Rivers and Trans-boundary Eco-security, Kunming, 650091, PR China; Corresponding author. Institute of International River and Eco-security, Yunnan University, Kunming, 650091, PR China.Institute of International River and Eco-security, Yunnan University, Kunming, 650091, PR China; Yunnan Key Laboratory of International Rivers and Trans-boundary Eco-security, Kunming, 650091, PR ChinaState Key Laboratory of Urban and Regional Ecology, Research Center for Eco-Environmental Sciences, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, 100085, PR China; University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, 100049, PR ChinaInstitute of International River and Eco-security, Yunnan University, Kunming, 650091, PR ChinaInstitute of International River and Eco-security, Yunnan University, Kunming, 650091, PR ChinaThe Grain for Green Program and soil and water conservation engineering initiatives are crucial for controlling erosion in steep-slope agriculture. However, it is still unclear how these two management methods should be carried out in respect to the situation in mountainous areas. Therefore, taking a typical mountainous area in southwest China as an example, we simulated six scenarios in order to compare the food provisioning service (FPS) and soil conservation service of the Grain for Green Program (converting to grassland) and Construction Measures (converting to sloping terrace) under different slopes. Results showed that when farmland with a >25° slope was converted into grassland, the amount of soil erosion (M) decreased by 21.0%, while FPS decreased by only 0.7%. However, when farmland with a >25° slope was converted into sloping terrace, M decreased by 31.3% while FPS increased by 18.7%. With the increases of farmland slope ranges in the Construction Measures scenario, M gradually decreased and FPS gradually increased. Particularly when farmland >15° was converted into sloping terrace, M decreased by 63.9% and FPS increased by 52.7%. Furthermore, the trade-offs of Construction Measures are lower than that of Grain for Green on different slope ranges. Therefore, we conclude that Construction Measures are a more suitable method in mountainous areas than the Grain for Green, and we suggest that further research be conducted to consider the ecological risks of construction engineering measures.http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2095633923000370Soil erosionGrain for greenConstruction measuresMountainous areas |
spellingShingle | Yawen Li Yuxiang Li Xingwu Duan Zhongyin Cai Ya Li Baiyun He Long Yin Trade-off analyses between food provision and soil conservation service of Grain for Green Program in Mountainous Area International Soil and Water Conservation Research Soil erosion Grain for green Construction measures Mountainous areas |
title | Trade-off analyses between food provision and soil conservation service of Grain for Green Program in Mountainous Area |
title_full | Trade-off analyses between food provision and soil conservation service of Grain for Green Program in Mountainous Area |
title_fullStr | Trade-off analyses between food provision and soil conservation service of Grain for Green Program in Mountainous Area |
title_full_unstemmed | Trade-off analyses between food provision and soil conservation service of Grain for Green Program in Mountainous Area |
title_short | Trade-off analyses between food provision and soil conservation service of Grain for Green Program in Mountainous Area |
title_sort | trade off analyses between food provision and soil conservation service of grain for green program in mountainous area |
topic | Soil erosion Grain for green Construction measures Mountainous areas |
url | http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2095633923000370 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT yawenli tradeoffanalysesbetweenfoodprovisionandsoilconservationserviceofgrainforgreenprograminmountainousarea AT yuxiangli tradeoffanalysesbetweenfoodprovisionandsoilconservationserviceofgrainforgreenprograminmountainousarea AT xingwuduan tradeoffanalysesbetweenfoodprovisionandsoilconservationserviceofgrainforgreenprograminmountainousarea AT zhongyincai tradeoffanalysesbetweenfoodprovisionandsoilconservationserviceofgrainforgreenprograminmountainousarea AT yali tradeoffanalysesbetweenfoodprovisionandsoilconservationserviceofgrainforgreenprograminmountainousarea AT baiyunhe tradeoffanalysesbetweenfoodprovisionandsoilconservationserviceofgrainforgreenprograminmountainousarea AT longyin tradeoffanalysesbetweenfoodprovisionandsoilconservationserviceofgrainforgreenprograminmountainousarea |