Neurapraxia in patients with trigeminal neuralgia but no identifiable neurovascular conflict during microvascular decompression: a retrospective analysis of 26 cases

Abstract Background Microvascular decompression (MVD) is the first choice in patients with classic trigeminal neuralgia (TGN) that could not be sufficiently controlled by pharmacological treatment. However, neurovascular conflict (NVC) could not be identified during MVD in all patients. To describe...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Juan Li, Min Zhou, Yuhai Wang, Sze Chai Kwok, Jia Yin
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMC 2022-01-01
Series:BMC Surgery
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1186/s12893-022-01469-3
_version_ 1798026159209840640
author Juan Li
Min Zhou
Yuhai Wang
Sze Chai Kwok
Jia Yin
author_facet Juan Li
Min Zhou
Yuhai Wang
Sze Chai Kwok
Jia Yin
author_sort Juan Li
collection DOAJ
description Abstract Background Microvascular decompression (MVD) is the first choice in patients with classic trigeminal neuralgia (TGN) that could not be sufficiently controlled by pharmacological treatment. However, neurovascular conflict (NVC) could not be identified during MVD in all patients. To describe the efficacy and safety of treatment with aneurysm clips in these situations. Methods A total of 205 patients underwent MVD for classic TGN at our center from January 1, 2015 to December 31, 2019. In patients without identifiable NVC upon dissection of the entire trigeminal nerve root, neurapraxia was performed using a Yasargil temporary titanium aneurysm clip (force: 90 g) for 40 s (or a total of 60 s if the process must be suspended temporarily due to bradycardia or hypertension). Results A total of 26 patients (median age: 64 years; 15 women) underwent neurapraxia. Five out of the 26 patients received prior MVD but relapsed. Immediate complete pain relief was achieved in all 26 cases. Within a median follow-up of 3 years (range: 1.0–6.0), recurrence was noted in 3 cases (11.5%). Postoperative complications included hemifacial numbness, herpes labialis, masseter weakness; most were transient and dissipated within 3–6 months. Conclusions Neurapraxia using aneurysm clip is safe and effective in patients with classic TGN but no identifiable NVC during MVD. Whether this method could be developed into a standardizable method needs further investigation.
first_indexed 2024-04-11T18:30:48Z
format Article
id doaj.art-50a6103499b443bdb2496d8758c3fe17
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1471-2482
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-11T18:30:48Z
publishDate 2022-01-01
publisher BMC
record_format Article
series BMC Surgery
spelling doaj.art-50a6103499b443bdb2496d8758c3fe172022-12-22T04:09:26ZengBMCBMC Surgery1471-24822022-01-012211510.1186/s12893-022-01469-3Neurapraxia in patients with trigeminal neuralgia but no identifiable neurovascular conflict during microvascular decompression: a retrospective analysis of 26 casesJuan Li0Min Zhou1Yuhai Wang2Sze Chai Kwok3Jia Yin4Department of Neurosurgery, Shanghai Tenth People’s Hospital, Tongji UniversityDepartment of Neurosurgery, Bengbu First People’s HospitalDepartment of Neurosurgery, 904 Hospital of PLAShanghai Key Laboratory of Brain Functional Genomics, Key Laboratory of Brain Functional Genomics Ministry of Education, School of Psychology and Cognitive Science, East China Normal UniversityDepartment of Neurosurgery, Shanghai Tenth People’s Hospital, Tongji UniversityAbstract Background Microvascular decompression (MVD) is the first choice in patients with classic trigeminal neuralgia (TGN) that could not be sufficiently controlled by pharmacological treatment. However, neurovascular conflict (NVC) could not be identified during MVD in all patients. To describe the efficacy and safety of treatment with aneurysm clips in these situations. Methods A total of 205 patients underwent MVD for classic TGN at our center from January 1, 2015 to December 31, 2019. In patients without identifiable NVC upon dissection of the entire trigeminal nerve root, neurapraxia was performed using a Yasargil temporary titanium aneurysm clip (force: 90 g) for 40 s (or a total of 60 s if the process must be suspended temporarily due to bradycardia or hypertension). Results A total of 26 patients (median age: 64 years; 15 women) underwent neurapraxia. Five out of the 26 patients received prior MVD but relapsed. Immediate complete pain relief was achieved in all 26 cases. Within a median follow-up of 3 years (range: 1.0–6.0), recurrence was noted in 3 cases (11.5%). Postoperative complications included hemifacial numbness, herpes labialis, masseter weakness; most were transient and dissipated within 3–6 months. Conclusions Neurapraxia using aneurysm clip is safe and effective in patients with classic TGN but no identifiable NVC during MVD. Whether this method could be developed into a standardizable method needs further investigation.https://doi.org/10.1186/s12893-022-01469-3Trigeminal neuralgiaMicrovascular decompressionOffending vesselneurapraxia
spellingShingle Juan Li
Min Zhou
Yuhai Wang
Sze Chai Kwok
Jia Yin
Neurapraxia in patients with trigeminal neuralgia but no identifiable neurovascular conflict during microvascular decompression: a retrospective analysis of 26 cases
BMC Surgery
Trigeminal neuralgia
Microvascular decompression
Offending vessel
neurapraxia
title Neurapraxia in patients with trigeminal neuralgia but no identifiable neurovascular conflict during microvascular decompression: a retrospective analysis of 26 cases
title_full Neurapraxia in patients with trigeminal neuralgia but no identifiable neurovascular conflict during microvascular decompression: a retrospective analysis of 26 cases
title_fullStr Neurapraxia in patients with trigeminal neuralgia but no identifiable neurovascular conflict during microvascular decompression: a retrospective analysis of 26 cases
title_full_unstemmed Neurapraxia in patients with trigeminal neuralgia but no identifiable neurovascular conflict during microvascular decompression: a retrospective analysis of 26 cases
title_short Neurapraxia in patients with trigeminal neuralgia but no identifiable neurovascular conflict during microvascular decompression: a retrospective analysis of 26 cases
title_sort neurapraxia in patients with trigeminal neuralgia but no identifiable neurovascular conflict during microvascular decompression a retrospective analysis of 26 cases
topic Trigeminal neuralgia
Microvascular decompression
Offending vessel
neurapraxia
url https://doi.org/10.1186/s12893-022-01469-3
work_keys_str_mv AT juanli neurapraxiainpatientswithtrigeminalneuralgiabutnoidentifiableneurovascularconflictduringmicrovasculardecompressionaretrospectiveanalysisof26cases
AT minzhou neurapraxiainpatientswithtrigeminalneuralgiabutnoidentifiableneurovascularconflictduringmicrovasculardecompressionaretrospectiveanalysisof26cases
AT yuhaiwang neurapraxiainpatientswithtrigeminalneuralgiabutnoidentifiableneurovascularconflictduringmicrovasculardecompressionaretrospectiveanalysisof26cases
AT szechaikwok neurapraxiainpatientswithtrigeminalneuralgiabutnoidentifiableneurovascularconflictduringmicrovasculardecompressionaretrospectiveanalysisof26cases
AT jiayin neurapraxiainpatientswithtrigeminalneuralgiabutnoidentifiableneurovascularconflictduringmicrovasculardecompressionaretrospectiveanalysisof26cases