Review on green building rating tools worldwide: recommendations for Australia

Buildings could be led to adverse impacts on environment, such as generation of construction and demolition waste, and emission of greenhouse gases (GHG). Therefore, promotion on development of green buildings is in need. With the increasing awareness in sustainable development, various rating tools...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: I. M. Chethana S. Illankoon, Vivian W. Y. Tam, Khoa N. Le, Cuong N. N. Tran, Mingxue Ma
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Vilnius Gediminas Technical University 2019-10-01
Series:Journal of Civil Engineering and Management
Subjects:
Online Access:https://bme.vgtu.lt/index.php/JCEM/article/view/10928
_version_ 1818877002068787200
author I. M. Chethana S. Illankoon
Vivian W. Y. Tam
Khoa N. Le
Cuong N. N. Tran
Mingxue Ma
author_facet I. M. Chethana S. Illankoon
Vivian W. Y. Tam
Khoa N. Le
Cuong N. N. Tran
Mingxue Ma
author_sort I. M. Chethana S. Illankoon
collection DOAJ
description Buildings could be led to adverse impacts on environment, such as generation of construction and demolition waste, and emission of greenhouse gases (GHG). Therefore, promotion on development of green buildings is in need. With the increasing awareness in sustainable development, various rating tools are promoted to evaluate the performance of green buildings. Nowadays, these tools function as a guideline for green building development. There are various green building rating tools developed worldwide, and various countries follow different rules, incentives and regulations. However, despite of promotion of green building rating tools, environmental issues from buildings are still significant in Australia. This research compared green building rating tools in Australia and other countries or regions around the world. This research found that rating tools in Australia lack of (1) mandatory criteria and (2) regulations and incentives. This paper recommended that governmental incentives should be promoted.
first_indexed 2024-12-19T13:51:21Z
format Article
id doaj.art-50a69e62ad4b47569474914426088468
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1392-3730
1822-3605
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-19T13:51:21Z
publishDate 2019-10-01
publisher Vilnius Gediminas Technical University
record_format Article
series Journal of Civil Engineering and Management
spelling doaj.art-50a69e62ad4b475694749144260884682022-12-21T20:18:43ZengVilnius Gediminas Technical UniversityJournal of Civil Engineering and Management1392-37301822-36052019-10-0125810.3846/jcem.2019.10928Review on green building rating tools worldwide: recommendations for AustraliaI. M. Chethana S. Illankoon0Vivian W. Y. Tam1Khoa N. Le2Cuong N. N. Tran3Mingxue Ma4Department of Architecture and Civil Engineering, University of Newcastle, AustraliaSchool of Computing Engineering and Mathematics, Western Sydney University, Locked Bag 1797, Penrith, NSW 2751, Australia; College of Civil Engineering, Shenzhen University, Shenzhen, ChinaSchool of Computing Engineering and Mathematics, Western Sydney University, Locked Bag 1797, Penrith, NSW 2751, AustraliaSchool of Computing Engineering and Mathematics, Western Sydney University, Locked Bag 1797, Penrith, NSW 2751, AustraliaSchool of Computing Engineering and Mathematics, Western Sydney University, Locked Bag 1797, Penrith, NSW 2751, AustraliaBuildings could be led to adverse impacts on environment, such as generation of construction and demolition waste, and emission of greenhouse gases (GHG). Therefore, promotion on development of green buildings is in need. With the increasing awareness in sustainable development, various rating tools are promoted to evaluate the performance of green buildings. Nowadays, these tools function as a guideline for green building development. There are various green building rating tools developed worldwide, and various countries follow different rules, incentives and regulations. However, despite of promotion of green building rating tools, environmental issues from buildings are still significant in Australia. This research compared green building rating tools in Australia and other countries or regions around the world. This research found that rating tools in Australia lack of (1) mandatory criteria and (2) regulations and incentives. This paper recommended that governmental incentives should be promoted.https://bme.vgtu.lt/index.php/JCEM/article/view/10928green buildingassessment toolsrating toolsAustralia
spellingShingle I. M. Chethana S. Illankoon
Vivian W. Y. Tam
Khoa N. Le
Cuong N. N. Tran
Mingxue Ma
Review on green building rating tools worldwide: recommendations for Australia
Journal of Civil Engineering and Management
green building
assessment tools
rating tools
Australia
title Review on green building rating tools worldwide: recommendations for Australia
title_full Review on green building rating tools worldwide: recommendations for Australia
title_fullStr Review on green building rating tools worldwide: recommendations for Australia
title_full_unstemmed Review on green building rating tools worldwide: recommendations for Australia
title_short Review on green building rating tools worldwide: recommendations for Australia
title_sort review on green building rating tools worldwide recommendations for australia
topic green building
assessment tools
rating tools
Australia
url https://bme.vgtu.lt/index.php/JCEM/article/view/10928
work_keys_str_mv AT imchethanasillankoon reviewongreenbuildingratingtoolsworldwiderecommendationsforaustralia
AT vivianwytam reviewongreenbuildingratingtoolsworldwiderecommendationsforaustralia
AT khoanle reviewongreenbuildingratingtoolsworldwiderecommendationsforaustralia
AT cuongnntran reviewongreenbuildingratingtoolsworldwiderecommendationsforaustralia
AT mingxuema reviewongreenbuildingratingtoolsworldwiderecommendationsforaustralia