Malnutrition in an Academic Health Sciences Centre: Applying results from nutritionDay 2011 to the proposed Global Leadership Initiative on Malnutrition approach to diagnosing malnutrition

Summary: Background: Malnutrition remains a significant ongoing issue in hospitalized patients, with cancer patients having one of the highest rates of malnutrition. Early identification with appropriate intervention is vitally important. nutritionDay is an international nutrition research study th...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Daniela Fierini, Janet Madill
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Elsevier 2020-08-01
Series:Clinical Nutrition Experimental
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352939320300117
_version_ 1818527269643091968
author Daniela Fierini
Janet Madill
author_facet Daniela Fierini
Janet Madill
author_sort Daniela Fierini
collection DOAJ
description Summary: Background: Malnutrition remains a significant ongoing issue in hospitalized patients, with cancer patients having one of the highest rates of malnutrition. Early identification with appropriate intervention is vitally important. nutritionDay is an international nutrition research study that was launched in 2006 to improve malnutrition awareness, education and research. The Canadian Nutrition Screening Tool [CNST] is validated to screen and identify patients at risk of malnutrition. In 2016, the Global Leadership Initiative on Malnutrition [GLIM] was convened to address the urgent need for simple and relevant clinical care guidelines for screening and diagnosing malnutrition. Aim: The primary aim was to determine malnutrition prevalence at the three sites of an Academic Health Sciences Centre [AHSC] by applying data gathered from nutritionDay 2011 to the GLIM two-step approach to diagnosing malnutrition. The secondary aim was to compare malnutrition prevalence between the three sites, with a specific interest in the results from AHSC-a, the cancer center, since cancer patients are known to have one of the highest rates of malnutrition The tertiary aim was to explore possible reasons for poor intake in AHSC overall. Methods: A one-day cross-sectional audit involving 264 patients at three AHSC sites was conducted in 2011 as part of the international nutritionDay research study. The unintentional weight loss and food consumption data were applied to CNST. Malnutrition diagnosis was determined using data for body mass index [BMI] and the fraction of study meal consumed. The nutritionDay adaptation of GLIM criteria to fit the nutritionDay survey was used. Statistical analysis: Categorical data are presented as actual numbers or percentages, with the groups compared by the Chi square test. Continuous variables expressed as mean ± SEM were used. One-way analysis of variance and Student t-tests were used to compare variables of interest. Significance p < 0.05, SPSS v.26 was used for analysis. Results: 44% (264/600) of patients at the AHSC participated in the nutritionDay 2011 study. 59% of patients at AHSC-a screened positive for risk of malnutrition compared to the other two sites (AHSC-b and AHSC-c),p = 0.002 and 0.014 respectively. Overall, 23% of patients would have been diagnosed as malnourished with AHSC-b at 56% compared to 17% AHSC-c [p = 0.041). Conclusion: Using the GLIM two-step approach, we report 38% of patients were at risk for malnutrition using the CNST and 1 in 4 of those identified at risk would be diagnosed as malnourished. As well, more patients at the cancer site were found to be at risk for malnutrition.
first_indexed 2024-12-11T06:33:57Z
format Article
id doaj.art-50a9eda92f824b30a5889f95c7acfa4f
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2352-9393
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-11T06:33:57Z
publishDate 2020-08-01
publisher Elsevier
record_format Article
series Clinical Nutrition Experimental
spelling doaj.art-50a9eda92f824b30a5889f95c7acfa4f2022-12-22T01:17:26ZengElsevierClinical Nutrition Experimental2352-93932020-08-0132110Malnutrition in an Academic Health Sciences Centre: Applying results from nutritionDay 2011 to the proposed Global Leadership Initiative on Malnutrition approach to diagnosing malnutritionDaniela Fierini0Janet Madill1Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, CanadaSchool of Food and Nutritional Sciences, Brescia University College, Canada; Corresponding author.Summary: Background: Malnutrition remains a significant ongoing issue in hospitalized patients, with cancer patients having one of the highest rates of malnutrition. Early identification with appropriate intervention is vitally important. nutritionDay is an international nutrition research study that was launched in 2006 to improve malnutrition awareness, education and research. The Canadian Nutrition Screening Tool [CNST] is validated to screen and identify patients at risk of malnutrition. In 2016, the Global Leadership Initiative on Malnutrition [GLIM] was convened to address the urgent need for simple and relevant clinical care guidelines for screening and diagnosing malnutrition. Aim: The primary aim was to determine malnutrition prevalence at the three sites of an Academic Health Sciences Centre [AHSC] by applying data gathered from nutritionDay 2011 to the GLIM two-step approach to diagnosing malnutrition. The secondary aim was to compare malnutrition prevalence between the three sites, with a specific interest in the results from AHSC-a, the cancer center, since cancer patients are known to have one of the highest rates of malnutrition The tertiary aim was to explore possible reasons for poor intake in AHSC overall. Methods: A one-day cross-sectional audit involving 264 patients at three AHSC sites was conducted in 2011 as part of the international nutritionDay research study. The unintentional weight loss and food consumption data were applied to CNST. Malnutrition diagnosis was determined using data for body mass index [BMI] and the fraction of study meal consumed. The nutritionDay adaptation of GLIM criteria to fit the nutritionDay survey was used. Statistical analysis: Categorical data are presented as actual numbers or percentages, with the groups compared by the Chi square test. Continuous variables expressed as mean ± SEM were used. One-way analysis of variance and Student t-tests were used to compare variables of interest. Significance p < 0.05, SPSS v.26 was used for analysis. Results: 44% (264/600) of patients at the AHSC participated in the nutritionDay 2011 study. 59% of patients at AHSC-a screened positive for risk of malnutrition compared to the other two sites (AHSC-b and AHSC-c),p = 0.002 and 0.014 respectively. Overall, 23% of patients would have been diagnosed as malnourished with AHSC-b at 56% compared to 17% AHSC-c [p = 0.041). Conclusion: Using the GLIM two-step approach, we report 38% of patients were at risk for malnutrition using the CNST and 1 in 4 of those identified at risk would be diagnosed as malnourished. As well, more patients at the cancer site were found to be at risk for malnutrition.http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352939320300117MalnutritionCNSTGLIMPatientsNutrition risk
spellingShingle Daniela Fierini
Janet Madill
Malnutrition in an Academic Health Sciences Centre: Applying results from nutritionDay 2011 to the proposed Global Leadership Initiative on Malnutrition approach to diagnosing malnutrition
Clinical Nutrition Experimental
Malnutrition
CNST
GLIM
Patients
Nutrition risk
title Malnutrition in an Academic Health Sciences Centre: Applying results from nutritionDay 2011 to the proposed Global Leadership Initiative on Malnutrition approach to diagnosing malnutrition
title_full Malnutrition in an Academic Health Sciences Centre: Applying results from nutritionDay 2011 to the proposed Global Leadership Initiative on Malnutrition approach to diagnosing malnutrition
title_fullStr Malnutrition in an Academic Health Sciences Centre: Applying results from nutritionDay 2011 to the proposed Global Leadership Initiative on Malnutrition approach to diagnosing malnutrition
title_full_unstemmed Malnutrition in an Academic Health Sciences Centre: Applying results from nutritionDay 2011 to the proposed Global Leadership Initiative on Malnutrition approach to diagnosing malnutrition
title_short Malnutrition in an Academic Health Sciences Centre: Applying results from nutritionDay 2011 to the proposed Global Leadership Initiative on Malnutrition approach to diagnosing malnutrition
title_sort malnutrition in an academic health sciences centre applying results from nutritionday 2011 to the proposed global leadership initiative on malnutrition approach to diagnosing malnutrition
topic Malnutrition
CNST
GLIM
Patients
Nutrition risk
url http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352939320300117
work_keys_str_mv AT danielafierini malnutritioninanacademichealthsciencescentreapplyingresultsfromnutritionday2011totheproposedgloballeadershipinitiativeonmalnutritionapproachtodiagnosingmalnutrition
AT janetmadill malnutritioninanacademichealthsciencescentreapplyingresultsfromnutritionday2011totheproposedgloballeadershipinitiativeonmalnutritionapproachtodiagnosingmalnutrition