Line-segment Feature Analysis Algorithm Using Input Dimensionality Reduction for Handwritten Text Recognition

Recently, demand for handwriting recognition, such as automation of mail sorting, license plate recognition, and electronic memo pads, has exponentially increased in various industrial fields. In addition, in the image recognition field, methods using artificial convolutional neural networks, which...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Chang-Min Kim, Ellen J. Hong, Kyungyong Chung, Roy C. Park
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2020-10-01
Series:Applied Sciences
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/2076-3417/10/19/6904
Description
Summary:Recently, demand for handwriting recognition, such as automation of mail sorting, license plate recognition, and electronic memo pads, has exponentially increased in various industrial fields. In addition, in the image recognition field, methods using artificial convolutional neural networks, which show outstanding performance, have been applied to handwriting recognition. However, owing to the diversity of recognition application fields, the number of dimensions in the learning and reasoning processes is increasing. To solve this problem, a principal component analysis (PCA) technique is used for dimensionality reduction. However, PCA is likely to increase the accuracy loss due to data compression. Therefore, in this paper, we propose a line-segment feature analysis (LFA) algorithm for input dimensionality reduction in handwritten text recognition. This proposed algorithm extracts the line segment information, constituting the image of input data, and assigns a unique value to each segment using 3 × 3 and 5 × 5 filters. Using the unique values to identify the number of line segments and adding them up, a 1-D vector with a size of 512 is created. This vector is used as input to machine-learning. For the performance evaluation of the method, the Extending Modified National Institute of Standards and Technology (EMNIST) database was used. In the evaluation, PCA showed 96.6% and 93.86% accuracy with k-nearest neighbors (KNN) and support vector machine (SVM), respectively, while LFA showed 97.5% and 98.9% accuracy with KNN and SVM, respectively.
ISSN:2076-3417