Crosslinguistic influence on Chinese EFL learners’ acquisition of English finite and nonfinite distinctions
English and Chinese have typological differences in finiteness. English has morphological finite and nonfinite distinction, whereas Chinese has no morphological finiteness, and multiple verbs in a clause appear in the form of bare verbs with optional aspectual morphemes, such as the perfective morph...
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Taylor & Francis Group
2020-01-01
|
| Series: | Cogent Education |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2020.1721642 |
| _version_ | 1797714782861656064 |
|---|---|
| author | Mengmeng Tang |
| author_facet | Mengmeng Tang |
| author_sort | Mengmeng Tang |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | English and Chinese have typological differences in finiteness. English has morphological finite and nonfinite distinction, whereas Chinese has no morphological finiteness, and multiple verbs in a clause appear in the form of bare verbs with optional aspectual morphemes, such as the perfective morpheme “le”. The current study explores whether and how the lack of morphological finite and nonfinite distinctions in Chinese influences Chinese EFL (English as Foreign Language) learners’ acquisition of English finite and nonfinite distinctions. The analysis of Chinese learners’ English corpus showed evidence of both morphological transfer of bare verbs and morphosyntactic transfer by over-inflecting nonfinite verbs in English writing. These results evidenced the crosslinguistic influence on Chinese EFL learners’ acquisition of English finite and nonfinite distinctions. The crosslinguistic influence also had an interaction with L2 proficiency, that is, low proficiency learners tended to have both morphological and syntactic transfer whereas with the development of L2 proficiency, syntactic transfer was reduced dramatically while morphology remained to be a problem. It thus revealed Chinese learners’ developmental route and implied their morphological insensitivity. |
| first_indexed | 2024-03-12T07:56:47Z |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj.art-50c2cedaff124850948db632b8dcf975 |
| institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
| issn | 2331-186X |
| language | English |
| last_indexed | 2024-03-12T07:56:47Z |
| publishDate | 2020-01-01 |
| publisher | Taylor & Francis Group |
| record_format | Article |
| series | Cogent Education |
| spelling | doaj.art-50c2cedaff124850948db632b8dcf9752023-09-02T20:07:14ZengTaylor & Francis GroupCogent Education2331-186X2020-01-017110.1080/2331186X.2020.17216421721642Crosslinguistic influence on Chinese EFL learners’ acquisition of English finite and nonfinite distinctionsMengmeng Tang0China University of PetroleumEnglish and Chinese have typological differences in finiteness. English has morphological finite and nonfinite distinction, whereas Chinese has no morphological finiteness, and multiple verbs in a clause appear in the form of bare verbs with optional aspectual morphemes, such as the perfective morpheme “le”. The current study explores whether and how the lack of morphological finite and nonfinite distinctions in Chinese influences Chinese EFL (English as Foreign Language) learners’ acquisition of English finite and nonfinite distinctions. The analysis of Chinese learners’ English corpus showed evidence of both morphological transfer of bare verbs and morphosyntactic transfer by over-inflecting nonfinite verbs in English writing. These results evidenced the crosslinguistic influence on Chinese EFL learners’ acquisition of English finite and nonfinite distinctions. The crosslinguistic influence also had an interaction with L2 proficiency, that is, low proficiency learners tended to have both morphological and syntactic transfer whereas with the development of L2 proficiency, syntactic transfer was reduced dramatically while morphology remained to be a problem. It thus revealed Chinese learners’ developmental route and implied their morphological insensitivity.http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2020.1721642crosslinguistic influencefinite/nonfinite distinctionchinese efl learners |
| spellingShingle | Mengmeng Tang Crosslinguistic influence on Chinese EFL learners’ acquisition of English finite and nonfinite distinctions Cogent Education crosslinguistic influence finite/nonfinite distinction chinese efl learners |
| title | Crosslinguistic influence on Chinese EFL learners’ acquisition of English finite and nonfinite distinctions |
| title_full | Crosslinguistic influence on Chinese EFL learners’ acquisition of English finite and nonfinite distinctions |
| title_fullStr | Crosslinguistic influence on Chinese EFL learners’ acquisition of English finite and nonfinite distinctions |
| title_full_unstemmed | Crosslinguistic influence on Chinese EFL learners’ acquisition of English finite and nonfinite distinctions |
| title_short | Crosslinguistic influence on Chinese EFL learners’ acquisition of English finite and nonfinite distinctions |
| title_sort | crosslinguistic influence on chinese efl learners acquisition of english finite and nonfinite distinctions |
| topic | crosslinguistic influence finite/nonfinite distinction chinese efl learners |
| url | http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2020.1721642 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT mengmengtang crosslinguisticinfluenceonchineseefllearnersacquisitionofenglishfiniteandnonfinitedistinctions |