The controlling nutritional status score predicts outcomes of cardiovascular events in patients with heart failure with preserved ejection fraction

Backgrounds: The relationship between cardiovascular outcomes and the Controlling Nutritional Status (CONUT) score in heart failure (HF) with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) patients is unknown. This study aimed to evaluate the relationship between the score and cardiovascular outcomes in HFpEF...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Takashi Komorita, Eiichiro Yamamoto, Daisuke Sueta, Takanori Tokitsu, Koichiro Fujisue, Hiroki Usuku, Taiki Nishihara, Fumi Oike, Masafumi Takae, Koichi Egashira, Seiji Takashio, Miwa Ito, Kenshi Yamanaga, Yuichiro Arima, Kenji Sakamoto, Satoru Suzuki, Koichi Kaikita, Kenichi Tsujita
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Elsevier 2020-08-01
Series:International Journal of Cardiology: Heart & Vasculature
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S235290672030261X
Description
Summary:Backgrounds: The relationship between cardiovascular outcomes and the Controlling Nutritional Status (CONUT) score in heart failure (HF) with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) patients is unknown. This study aimed to evaluate the relationship between the score and cardiovascular outcomes in HFpEF patients. Methods and results: A total of 506 consecutive HFpEF patients were prospectively observed for up to 1500 days or until the occurrence of cardiovascular events. The mean age was 71.6 ± 9.4 years. Cardiovascular outcomes were compared between the CONUT score 0–1 group with a normal nutritional state (normal group), the CONUT score 2–4 group with a light degree of undernutrition (light group), and the CONUT score 5–8 group with a moderate degree of undernutrition (moderate group). In this study, there were no patients who scored 9–12, which was defined as a severe state of undernutrition. Overall, 238 cardiovascular events were observed during the follow-up period (median: 1159 days). Kaplan–Meier analysis showed that the moderate group was at higher risk of composite cardiovascular events than the normal group (P < 0.001) and the light group (P = 0.031). The analysis also showed that the light group was at higher risk of composite cardiovascular events than the normal group (P = 0.038). Multivariable Cox proportional hazards analysis with the significant factors from the univariate analysis showed that the CONUT score (hazard ratio: 1.12, 95% confidence interval: 1.03–1.21, P = 0.005) significantly predicted future cardiovascular events. Conclusion: Nutritional screening using the CONUT score may be useful for predicting cardiovascular events in HFpEF patients.
ISSN:2352-9067