New physics in b → sμμ: FCC-hh or a muon collider?

Abstract Rare flavour-changing neutral-current transitions b → sμ + μ − probe higher energy scales than what is directly accessible at the LHC. Therefore, the presence of new physics in such transitions, as suggested by the present-day LHCb anomalies, would have a major impact on the motivation and...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Aleksandr Azatov, Francesco Garosi, Admir Greljo, David Marzocca, Jakub Salko, Sokratis Trifinopoulos
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: SpringerOpen 2022-10-01
Series:Journal of High Energy Physics
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1007/JHEP10(2022)149
_version_ 1811249861118394368
author Aleksandr Azatov
Francesco Garosi
Admir Greljo
David Marzocca
Jakub Salko
Sokratis Trifinopoulos
author_facet Aleksandr Azatov
Francesco Garosi
Admir Greljo
David Marzocca
Jakub Salko
Sokratis Trifinopoulos
author_sort Aleksandr Azatov
collection DOAJ
description Abstract Rare flavour-changing neutral-current transitions b → sμ + μ − probe higher energy scales than what is directly accessible at the LHC. Therefore, the presence of new physics in such transitions, as suggested by the present-day LHCb anomalies, would have a major impact on the motivation and planning of future high-energy colliders. The two most prominent options currently debated are a proton-proton collider at 100 TeV (FCC-hh) and a multi-TeV muon collider (MuC). In this work, we compare the discovery prospects at these colliders on benchmark new physics models indirectly detectable in b → sμ + μ − decays but beyond the reach of the high-p T searches at the HL-LHC. We consider a comprehensive set of scenarios: semileptonic contact interactions, Z′ from a gauged U 1 B 3 − L μ $$ \textrm{U}{(1)}_{B_3-{L}_{\mu }} $$ and U 1 L μ − L τ $$ \textrm{U}{(1)}_{L_{\mu }-{L}_{\tau }} $$ , the scalar leptoquark S 3, and the vector leptoquark U 1. We find that a 3 TeV MuC has a sensitivity reach comparable to the one of the FCC-hh. However, for a heavy enough mediator, the new physics effects at a 3 TeV MuC are only observed indirectly via deviations in the highest energy bin, while the FCC-hh has a greater potential for the discovery of a resonance. Finally, to completely cover the parameter space suggested by the bsμμ anomalies, among the proposed future colliders, only a MuC of 10 TeV (or higher) can meet the challenge.
first_indexed 2024-04-12T15:53:52Z
format Article
id doaj.art-50c699bd11594924b57d0c0a47763707
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1029-8479
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-12T15:53:52Z
publishDate 2022-10-01
publisher SpringerOpen
record_format Article
series Journal of High Energy Physics
spelling doaj.art-50c699bd11594924b57d0c0a477637072022-12-22T03:26:25ZengSpringerOpenJournal of High Energy Physics1029-84792022-10-0120221015010.1007/JHEP10(2022)149New physics in b → sμμ: FCC-hh or a muon collider?Aleksandr Azatov0Francesco Garosi1Admir Greljo2David Marzocca3Jakub Salko4Sokratis Trifinopoulos5SISSA International School for Advanced StudiesSISSA International School for Advanced StudiesAlbert Einstein Center for Fundamental Physics, Institute for Theoretical Physics, University of BernINFN, Sezione di Trieste, SISSAAlbert Einstein Center for Fundamental Physics, Institute for Theoretical Physics, University of BernINFN, Sezione di Trieste, SISSAAbstract Rare flavour-changing neutral-current transitions b → sμ + μ − probe higher energy scales than what is directly accessible at the LHC. Therefore, the presence of new physics in such transitions, as suggested by the present-day LHCb anomalies, would have a major impact on the motivation and planning of future high-energy colliders. The two most prominent options currently debated are a proton-proton collider at 100 TeV (FCC-hh) and a multi-TeV muon collider (MuC). In this work, we compare the discovery prospects at these colliders on benchmark new physics models indirectly detectable in b → sμ + μ − decays but beyond the reach of the high-p T searches at the HL-LHC. We consider a comprehensive set of scenarios: semileptonic contact interactions, Z′ from a gauged U 1 B 3 − L μ $$ \textrm{U}{(1)}_{B_3-{L}_{\mu }} $$ and U 1 L μ − L τ $$ \textrm{U}{(1)}_{L_{\mu }-{L}_{\tau }} $$ , the scalar leptoquark S 3, and the vector leptoquark U 1. We find that a 3 TeV MuC has a sensitivity reach comparable to the one of the FCC-hh. However, for a heavy enough mediator, the new physics effects at a 3 TeV MuC are only observed indirectly via deviations in the highest energy bin, while the FCC-hh has a greater potential for the discovery of a resonance. Finally, to completely cover the parameter space suggested by the bsμμ anomalies, among the proposed future colliders, only a MuC of 10 TeV (or higher) can meet the challenge.https://doi.org/10.1007/JHEP10(2022)149Specific BSM PhenomenologyNew Gauge InteractionsBottom QuarksRare Decays
spellingShingle Aleksandr Azatov
Francesco Garosi
Admir Greljo
David Marzocca
Jakub Salko
Sokratis Trifinopoulos
New physics in b → sμμ: FCC-hh or a muon collider?
Journal of High Energy Physics
Specific BSM Phenomenology
New Gauge Interactions
Bottom Quarks
Rare Decays
title New physics in b → sμμ: FCC-hh or a muon collider?
title_full New physics in b → sμμ: FCC-hh or a muon collider?
title_fullStr New physics in b → sμμ: FCC-hh or a muon collider?
title_full_unstemmed New physics in b → sμμ: FCC-hh or a muon collider?
title_short New physics in b → sμμ: FCC-hh or a muon collider?
title_sort new physics in b sμμ fcc hh or a muon collider
topic Specific BSM Phenomenology
New Gauge Interactions
Bottom Quarks
Rare Decays
url https://doi.org/10.1007/JHEP10(2022)149
work_keys_str_mv AT aleksandrazatov newphysicsinbsmmfcchhoramuoncollider
AT francescogarosi newphysicsinbsmmfcchhoramuoncollider
AT admirgreljo newphysicsinbsmmfcchhoramuoncollider
AT davidmarzocca newphysicsinbsmmfcchhoramuoncollider
AT jakubsalko newphysicsinbsmmfcchhoramuoncollider
AT sokratistrifinopoulos newphysicsinbsmmfcchhoramuoncollider