Positive Impulse Phase versus Propulsive Impulse Phase: Correlations between Asymmetry and Countermovement Jump Performance

The relationship between asymmetry and performance is still undetermined in the literature. Methods of assessing asymmetry have been inconsistent and focused on the analysis of jumping asymmetry. Dual ground reaction forces are prevalent in athlete monitoring, though underutilized in asymmetry resea...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Keith B. Painter, William Guy Hornsby, Kevin Carroll, Satoshi Mizuguchi, Michael H. Stone
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2022-04-01
Series:Journal of Functional Morphology and Kinesiology
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/2411-5142/7/2/31
_version_ 1827659571394510848
author Keith B. Painter
William Guy Hornsby
Kevin Carroll
Satoshi Mizuguchi
Michael H. Stone
author_facet Keith B. Painter
William Guy Hornsby
Kevin Carroll
Satoshi Mizuguchi
Michael H. Stone
author_sort Keith B. Painter
collection DOAJ
description The relationship between asymmetry and performance is still undetermined in the literature. Methods of assessing asymmetry have been inconsistent and focused on the analysis of jumping asymmetry. Dual ground reaction forces are prevalent in athlete monitoring, though underutilized in asymmetry research. The purpose of this study was to assess the relationship of countermovement jump (CMJ) impulse asymmetry to performance in collegiate soccer athletes. Male and female athletes were selected from an ongoing athlete research repository database of NCAA D-I soccer athletes. All athletes contributed two maximal effort unweighted (CMJ0) and weighted countermovement jumps (CMJ20) using the mean for calculations. Propulsive phase asymmetry scores (PrPAS) and positive impulse asymmetry scores (PIAS) were calculated to determine the magnitude of asymmetry for each prospective phase. Statistically significant correlations were found between CMJ0 jump height and unweighted PIAS (<i>r</i> = −0.43) in females. Males had statistically significant correlations between CMJ20 jump height and weighted PIAS (<i>r</i> = −0.49). Neither unweighted PrPAS nor weighted PrPAS produced statistically significant correlations (<i>r</i> < 0.26) to their prospective jump heights. When assessing CMJ asymmetry, it is recommended to conduct both weighted and unweighted CMJ testing, utilizing PIAS as the metric to be assessed.
first_indexed 2024-03-09T23:25:17Z
format Article
id doaj.art-50c9a24a4e5e4589a28556a0a1d2aeb5
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2411-5142
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-09T23:25:17Z
publishDate 2022-04-01
publisher MDPI AG
record_format Article
series Journal of Functional Morphology and Kinesiology
spelling doaj.art-50c9a24a4e5e4589a28556a0a1d2aeb52023-11-23T17:19:59ZengMDPI AGJournal of Functional Morphology and Kinesiology2411-51422022-04-01723110.3390/jfmk7020031Positive Impulse Phase versus Propulsive Impulse Phase: Correlations between Asymmetry and Countermovement Jump PerformanceKeith B. Painter0William Guy Hornsby1Kevin Carroll2Satoshi Mizuguchi3Michael H. Stone4Department of Sport Physiology & Performance, East Tennessee State University, Johnson City, TN 37614, USADepartment of Coaching and Teaching Studies, College of Physical Activity and Sport Sciences, West Virginia University, Morgantown, WV 26505, USADepartment of Sport Physiology & Performance, East Tennessee State University, Johnson City, TN 37614, USADepartment of Sport Physiology & Performance, East Tennessee State University, Johnson City, TN 37614, USADepartment of Sport Physiology & Performance, East Tennessee State University, Johnson City, TN 37614, USAThe relationship between asymmetry and performance is still undetermined in the literature. Methods of assessing asymmetry have been inconsistent and focused on the analysis of jumping asymmetry. Dual ground reaction forces are prevalent in athlete monitoring, though underutilized in asymmetry research. The purpose of this study was to assess the relationship of countermovement jump (CMJ) impulse asymmetry to performance in collegiate soccer athletes. Male and female athletes were selected from an ongoing athlete research repository database of NCAA D-I soccer athletes. All athletes contributed two maximal effort unweighted (CMJ0) and weighted countermovement jumps (CMJ20) using the mean for calculations. Propulsive phase asymmetry scores (PrPAS) and positive impulse asymmetry scores (PIAS) were calculated to determine the magnitude of asymmetry for each prospective phase. Statistically significant correlations were found between CMJ0 jump height and unweighted PIAS (<i>r</i> = −0.43) in females. Males had statistically significant correlations between CMJ20 jump height and weighted PIAS (<i>r</i> = −0.49). Neither unweighted PrPAS nor weighted PrPAS produced statistically significant correlations (<i>r</i> < 0.26) to their prospective jump heights. When assessing CMJ asymmetry, it is recommended to conduct both weighted and unweighted CMJ testing, utilizing PIAS as the metric to be assessed.https://www.mdpi.com/2411-5142/7/2/31asymmetrysymmetryground reaction forcejumping performancepositive impulse
spellingShingle Keith B. Painter
William Guy Hornsby
Kevin Carroll
Satoshi Mizuguchi
Michael H. Stone
Positive Impulse Phase versus Propulsive Impulse Phase: Correlations between Asymmetry and Countermovement Jump Performance
Journal of Functional Morphology and Kinesiology
asymmetry
symmetry
ground reaction force
jumping performance
positive impulse
title Positive Impulse Phase versus Propulsive Impulse Phase: Correlations between Asymmetry and Countermovement Jump Performance
title_full Positive Impulse Phase versus Propulsive Impulse Phase: Correlations between Asymmetry and Countermovement Jump Performance
title_fullStr Positive Impulse Phase versus Propulsive Impulse Phase: Correlations between Asymmetry and Countermovement Jump Performance
title_full_unstemmed Positive Impulse Phase versus Propulsive Impulse Phase: Correlations between Asymmetry and Countermovement Jump Performance
title_short Positive Impulse Phase versus Propulsive Impulse Phase: Correlations between Asymmetry and Countermovement Jump Performance
title_sort positive impulse phase versus propulsive impulse phase correlations between asymmetry and countermovement jump performance
topic asymmetry
symmetry
ground reaction force
jumping performance
positive impulse
url https://www.mdpi.com/2411-5142/7/2/31
work_keys_str_mv AT keithbpainter positiveimpulsephaseversuspropulsiveimpulsephasecorrelationsbetweenasymmetryandcountermovementjumpperformance
AT williamguyhornsby positiveimpulsephaseversuspropulsiveimpulsephasecorrelationsbetweenasymmetryandcountermovementjumpperformance
AT kevincarroll positiveimpulsephaseversuspropulsiveimpulsephasecorrelationsbetweenasymmetryandcountermovementjumpperformance
AT satoshimizuguchi positiveimpulsephaseversuspropulsiveimpulsephasecorrelationsbetweenasymmetryandcountermovementjumpperformance
AT michaelhstone positiveimpulsephaseversuspropulsiveimpulsephasecorrelationsbetweenasymmetryandcountermovementjumpperformance