Menimbang Gagasan Negara Hukum (Deliberatif) di Indonesia*
In these recent years the idea of deliberative democracy appears as an alternative idea in the middle of discourse of democracy’s contest and configuration. Through its critics which are submitted into two dominant democratic traditions (also seeking to synthesize them), viz republicanism and liber...
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
The Registrar and Secretariat General of the Constitutional Court of the Republic of Indonesia
2016-05-01
|
| Series: | Jurnal Konstitusi |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://jurnalkonstitusi.mkri.id/index.php/jk/article/view/250 |
| _version_ | 1797900759217471488 |
|---|---|
| author | Fahrul Muzaqqi |
| author_facet | Fahrul Muzaqqi |
| author_sort | Fahrul Muzaqqi |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description |
In these recent years the idea of deliberative democracy appears as an alternative idea in the middle of discourse of democracy’s contest and configuration. Through its critics which are submitted into two dominant democratic traditions (also seeking to synthesize them), viz republicanism and liberal democracy, deliberative democracy makes serious efforts to pass theoretical tensions of those two democratic traditions over by formulating a communicative participation theory in an autonomous public sphere which whom is inclusive (multi-actors), free from pressures, discrimination and manipulation.
Yet, the idea of deliberative democracy self if it is observed from many deliberation literatures and practices which are studied and implemented in many countries, it has at least two variants that are mutually exclusive. First, variant of impartialism which emphasize on normative principles including the attitude and action to be inclusive, autonomous (non-partisan) and holding on the argumentation which whom considers multi-perspectives and multi-actors in taking a decision or public policy. Inter-subjectivity of an opinion was emphasized very much relating to goodness and rightness of a decision. Second, the impartialism’s critics that realizes to the real of politics and criticizes the model of impartiality that is regarded as too utopian and idealistic in applying deliberation. Principles of reciprocity, continuity, inclusivity and heterogeneity of deliberation are taken as substitute of inter-subjectivity principle in impartiality model.
This paper makes a try to investigate the origin of deliberative democracy idea in modern democratic tradition. Furthermore it analyzes development of two variants of deliberative democracy idea. Finally, it endeavors to contextualize the history of Indonesian idea of democracy especially in the idea of consensus discussion (musyawarah mufakat) which is the heart of Indonesian democracy. Of course this paper uses more historical approach to explore them all.
|
| first_indexed | 2024-04-10T08:51:10Z |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj.art-50d58ec5154e4bc09b4446004fdc1a86 |
| institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
| issn | 1829-7706 2548-1657 |
| language | English |
| last_indexed | 2024-04-10T08:51:10Z |
| publishDate | 2016-05-01 |
| publisher | The Registrar and Secretariat General of the Constitutional Court of the Republic of Indonesia |
| record_format | Article |
| series | Jurnal Konstitusi |
| spelling | doaj.art-50d58ec5154e4bc09b4446004fdc1a862023-02-22T04:11:36ZengThe Registrar and Secretariat General of the Constitutional Court of the Republic of IndonesiaJurnal Konstitusi1829-77062548-16572016-05-017510.31078/jk758247Menimbang Gagasan Negara Hukum (Deliberatif) di Indonesia*Fahrul Muzaqqi0staf pengajar Departemen Politik, Fakultas Ilmu Sosial dan Ilmu Politik (FISIP), Universitas Airlangga pada mata kuliah: Teori-teori Politik Kontemporer, Ekonomi-Politik, Elit-elit Politik, dan Perbandingan Politik In these recent years the idea of deliberative democracy appears as an alternative idea in the middle of discourse of democracy’s contest and configuration. Through its critics which are submitted into two dominant democratic traditions (also seeking to synthesize them), viz republicanism and liberal democracy, deliberative democracy makes serious efforts to pass theoretical tensions of those two democratic traditions over by formulating a communicative participation theory in an autonomous public sphere which whom is inclusive (multi-actors), free from pressures, discrimination and manipulation. Yet, the idea of deliberative democracy self if it is observed from many deliberation literatures and practices which are studied and implemented in many countries, it has at least two variants that are mutually exclusive. First, variant of impartialism which emphasize on normative principles including the attitude and action to be inclusive, autonomous (non-partisan) and holding on the argumentation which whom considers multi-perspectives and multi-actors in taking a decision or public policy. Inter-subjectivity of an opinion was emphasized very much relating to goodness and rightness of a decision. Second, the impartialism’s critics that realizes to the real of politics and criticizes the model of impartiality that is regarded as too utopian and idealistic in applying deliberation. Principles of reciprocity, continuity, inclusivity and heterogeneity of deliberation are taken as substitute of inter-subjectivity principle in impartiality model. This paper makes a try to investigate the origin of deliberative democracy idea in modern democratic tradition. Furthermore it analyzes development of two variants of deliberative democracy idea. Finally, it endeavors to contextualize the history of Indonesian idea of democracy especially in the idea of consensus discussion (musyawarah mufakat) which is the heart of Indonesian democracy. Of course this paper uses more historical approach to explore them all. https://jurnalkonstitusi.mkri.id/index.php/jk/article/view/250deliberative democracyimpartialismimpartialism’s criticsIndonesian democracymusyawarah mufakat |
| spellingShingle | Fahrul Muzaqqi Menimbang Gagasan Negara Hukum (Deliberatif) di Indonesia* Jurnal Konstitusi deliberative democracy impartialism impartialism’s critics Indonesian democracy musyawarah mufakat |
| title | Menimbang Gagasan Negara Hukum (Deliberatif) di Indonesia* |
| title_full | Menimbang Gagasan Negara Hukum (Deliberatif) di Indonesia* |
| title_fullStr | Menimbang Gagasan Negara Hukum (Deliberatif) di Indonesia* |
| title_full_unstemmed | Menimbang Gagasan Negara Hukum (Deliberatif) di Indonesia* |
| title_short | Menimbang Gagasan Negara Hukum (Deliberatif) di Indonesia* |
| title_sort | menimbang gagasan negara hukum deliberatif di indonesia |
| topic | deliberative democracy impartialism impartialism’s critics Indonesian democracy musyawarah mufakat |
| url | https://jurnalkonstitusi.mkri.id/index.php/jk/article/view/250 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT fahrulmuzaqqi menimbanggagasannegarahukumdeliberatifdiindonesia |