The effect of floor type on the performance, cleanliness, carcass characteristics and meat quality of dairy origin bulls

The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of using different floor types to accommodate growing and finishing beef cattle on their performance, cleanliness, carcass characteristics and meat quality. In total, 80 dairy origin young bulls (mean initial live weight 224 kg (SD=28.4 kg)) were divi...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: V.S. Murphy, D.E. Lowe, F.O. Lively, A.W. Gordon
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Elsevier 2018-01-01
Series:Animal
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1751731117002282
_version_ 1819100377889374208
author V.S. Murphy
D.E. Lowe
F.O. Lively
A.W. Gordon
author_facet V.S. Murphy
D.E. Lowe
F.O. Lively
A.W. Gordon
author_sort V.S. Murphy
collection DOAJ
description The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of using different floor types to accommodate growing and finishing beef cattle on their performance, cleanliness, carcass characteristics and meat quality. In total, 80 dairy origin young bulls (mean initial live weight 224 kg (SD=28.4 kg)) were divided into 20 blocks with four animals each according to live weight. The total duration of the experimental period was 204 days. The first 101 days was defined as the growing period, with the remainder of the study defined as the finishing period. Cattle were randomly assigned within blocks to one of four floor type treatments, which included fully slatted flooring throughout the entire experimental period (CS); fully slatted flooring covered with rubber strips throughout the entire experimental period (RS); fully slatted flooring during the growing period and moved to a solid floor covered with straw bedding during the finishing period (CS-S) and fully slatted flooring during the growing period and moved to fully slatted flooring covered with rubber strips during the finishing period (CS-RS). Bulls were offered ad libitum grass silage supplemented with concentrates during the growing period. During the finishing period, bulls were offered concentrates supplemented with chopped barley straw. There was no significant effect of floor type on total dry matter intake (DMI), feed conversion ratio, daily live weight gain or back fat depth during the growing and finishing periods. Compared with bulls accommodated on CS, RS and CS-RS, bulls accommodated on CS-S had a significantly lower straw DMI (P<0.01). Although bulls accommodated on CS and CS-S were significantly dirtier compared with those accommodated on RS and CS-RS on days 50 (P<0.05) and 151 (P<0.01), there was no effect of floor type on the cleanliness of bulls at the end of the growing and finishing periods. There was also no significant effect of floor type on carcass characteristics or meat quality. However, bulls accommodated on CS-S had a tendency for less channel, cod and kidney fat (P=0.084) compared with those accommodated on CS, RS and CS-RS. Overall, floor type had no effect on the performance, cleanliness, carcass characteristics or meat quality of growing or finishing beef cattle.
first_indexed 2024-12-22T01:01:49Z
format Article
id doaj.art-50d8ad436b1443f0a269aa2be9bfe3e5
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1751-7311
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-22T01:01:49Z
publishDate 2018-01-01
publisher Elsevier
record_format Article
series Animal
spelling doaj.art-50d8ad436b1443f0a269aa2be9bfe3e52022-12-21T18:44:10ZengElsevierAnimal1751-73112018-01-0112511021110The effect of floor type on the performance, cleanliness, carcass characteristics and meat quality of dairy origin bullsV.S. Murphy0D.E. Lowe1F.O. Lively2A.W. Gordon3Sustainable Agri-Food Sciences Division, Agri-Food and Biosciences Institute, Large park, Hillsborough BT26 6DR, UK; School of Biological Sciences, Queens University Belfast, Belfast BT9 7BL, UKSustainable Agri-Food Sciences Division, Agri-Food and Biosciences Institute, Large park, Hillsborough BT26 6DR, UKSustainable Agri-Food Sciences Division, Agri-Food and Biosciences Institute, Large park, Hillsborough BT26 6DR, UKBiometrics and Information Systems Branch, Agri-Food and Biosciences Institute, 18a Newforge Lane, Belfast BT9 5PX, UKThe aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of using different floor types to accommodate growing and finishing beef cattle on their performance, cleanliness, carcass characteristics and meat quality. In total, 80 dairy origin young bulls (mean initial live weight 224 kg (SD=28.4 kg)) were divided into 20 blocks with four animals each according to live weight. The total duration of the experimental period was 204 days. The first 101 days was defined as the growing period, with the remainder of the study defined as the finishing period. Cattle were randomly assigned within blocks to one of four floor type treatments, which included fully slatted flooring throughout the entire experimental period (CS); fully slatted flooring covered with rubber strips throughout the entire experimental period (RS); fully slatted flooring during the growing period and moved to a solid floor covered with straw bedding during the finishing period (CS-S) and fully slatted flooring during the growing period and moved to fully slatted flooring covered with rubber strips during the finishing period (CS-RS). Bulls were offered ad libitum grass silage supplemented with concentrates during the growing period. During the finishing period, bulls were offered concentrates supplemented with chopped barley straw. There was no significant effect of floor type on total dry matter intake (DMI), feed conversion ratio, daily live weight gain or back fat depth during the growing and finishing periods. Compared with bulls accommodated on CS, RS and CS-RS, bulls accommodated on CS-S had a significantly lower straw DMI (P<0.01). Although bulls accommodated on CS and CS-S were significantly dirtier compared with those accommodated on RS and CS-RS on days 50 (P<0.05) and 151 (P<0.01), there was no effect of floor type on the cleanliness of bulls at the end of the growing and finishing periods. There was also no significant effect of floor type on carcass characteristics or meat quality. However, bulls accommodated on CS-S had a tendency for less channel, cod and kidney fat (P=0.084) compared with those accommodated on CS, RS and CS-RS. Overall, floor type had no effect on the performance, cleanliness, carcass characteristics or meat quality of growing or finishing beef cattle.http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1751731117002282beef cattlecarcass characteristicscleanlinessfloor typemeat quality
spellingShingle V.S. Murphy
D.E. Lowe
F.O. Lively
A.W. Gordon
The effect of floor type on the performance, cleanliness, carcass characteristics and meat quality of dairy origin bulls
Animal
beef cattle
carcass characteristics
cleanliness
floor type
meat quality
title The effect of floor type on the performance, cleanliness, carcass characteristics and meat quality of dairy origin bulls
title_full The effect of floor type on the performance, cleanliness, carcass characteristics and meat quality of dairy origin bulls
title_fullStr The effect of floor type on the performance, cleanliness, carcass characteristics and meat quality of dairy origin bulls
title_full_unstemmed The effect of floor type on the performance, cleanliness, carcass characteristics and meat quality of dairy origin bulls
title_short The effect of floor type on the performance, cleanliness, carcass characteristics and meat quality of dairy origin bulls
title_sort effect of floor type on the performance cleanliness carcass characteristics and meat quality of dairy origin bulls
topic beef cattle
carcass characteristics
cleanliness
floor type
meat quality
url http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1751731117002282
work_keys_str_mv AT vsmurphy theeffectoffloortypeontheperformancecleanlinesscarcasscharacteristicsandmeatqualityofdairyoriginbulls
AT delowe theeffectoffloortypeontheperformancecleanlinesscarcasscharacteristicsandmeatqualityofdairyoriginbulls
AT folively theeffectoffloortypeontheperformancecleanlinesscarcasscharacteristicsandmeatqualityofdairyoriginbulls
AT awgordon theeffectoffloortypeontheperformancecleanlinesscarcasscharacteristicsandmeatqualityofdairyoriginbulls
AT vsmurphy effectoffloortypeontheperformancecleanlinesscarcasscharacteristicsandmeatqualityofdairyoriginbulls
AT delowe effectoffloortypeontheperformancecleanlinesscarcasscharacteristicsandmeatqualityofdairyoriginbulls
AT folively effectoffloortypeontheperformancecleanlinesscarcasscharacteristicsandmeatqualityofdairyoriginbulls
AT awgordon effectoffloortypeontheperformancecleanlinesscarcasscharacteristicsandmeatqualityofdairyoriginbulls