Aerodynamic Characteristics Evaluation of S-Series Airfoils

The present study utilizes the commercial software ANSYS-Fluent to explore the influence of the geometry of thick S- S-series airfoil on the near-wake region. Four different S-series airfoils, namely S809, S811, S814, and S818, were investigated at a wide range of angles of attack, which were varied...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Hamzah Jaffar, Laith Al-Sadawi, Abdulkareem Khudair, Till Biedermann
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Unviversity of Technology- Iraq 2024-01-01
Series:Engineering and Technology Journal
Subjects:
Online Access:https://etj.uotechnology.edu.iq/article_180794_0f61cfcfd5c4b3dc71cd4cb6eb32a3d3.pdf
_version_ 1797325065671409664
author Hamzah Jaffar
Laith Al-Sadawi
Abdulkareem Khudair
Till Biedermann
author_facet Hamzah Jaffar
Laith Al-Sadawi
Abdulkareem Khudair
Till Biedermann
author_sort Hamzah Jaffar
collection DOAJ
description The present study utilizes the commercial software ANSYS-Fluent to explore the influence of the geometry of thick S- S-series airfoil on the near-wake region. Four different S-series airfoils, namely S809, S811, S814, and S818, were investigated at a wide range of angles of attack, which were varied from 0 degrees to 20 degrees with an increment of 2 degrees and at a Reynolds number based on chord length Re = 1x106. Analysis of the resultant data revealed that the aerodynamic performance of the S811 and S818 airfoils superseded that of the S809 and S814 airfoils. To illustrate, at the critical angle of attack, S811 and S818 were observed to possess the maximum lift and minimum drag coefficients. Furthermore, in the range of attack angles between 10 and 16 degrees, these airfoils consistently demonstrated lower drag than the others tested, enhancing overall aerodynamic performance. These findings underscore the significant role played by airfoil geometry in influencing aerodynamic performance and provide insights into optimal design parameters for wind turbine blades, particularly highlighting the advantages of the S811 and S818 airfoil shapes. In addition, the effect of the unsteady structures in the near-wake zone behind the trailing was also evaluated through turbulence kinetic energy contours. The results revealed a decrease in turbulence kinetic energy when the S811 and S818 airfoils were placed in a cross-flow compared to the S809 and S814 airfoils. This indicates that the strength of the vortex shedding of these airfoils is lower than that of the S809 and S8014 airfoils.
first_indexed 2024-03-08T06:04:27Z
format Article
id doaj.art-50de61708e134f02882bff6b1927cf02
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1681-6900
2412-0758
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-08T06:04:27Z
publishDate 2024-01-01
publisher Unviversity of Technology- Iraq
record_format Article
series Engineering and Technology Journal
spelling doaj.art-50de61708e134f02882bff6b1927cf022024-02-04T18:01:22ZengUnviversity of Technology- IraqEngineering and Technology Journal1681-69002412-07582024-01-01421657710.30684/etj.2023.141757.1512180794Aerodynamic Characteristics Evaluation of S-Series AirfoilsHamzah Jaffar0Laith Al-Sadawi1Abdulkareem Khudair2Till Biedermann3Mechanical Engineering Dept., University of Technology-Iraq, Alsina’a street, 10066 Baghdad, Iraq.Mechanical Engineering Dept., University of Technology-Iraq, Alsina’a street, 10066 Baghdad, Iraq.Mechanical Engineering Dept., University of Technology-Iraq, Alsina’a street, 10066 Baghdad, Iraq.R&D at Pollrich GmbH, Siegen, Germany.The present study utilizes the commercial software ANSYS-Fluent to explore the influence of the geometry of thick S- S-series airfoil on the near-wake region. Four different S-series airfoils, namely S809, S811, S814, and S818, were investigated at a wide range of angles of attack, which were varied from 0 degrees to 20 degrees with an increment of 2 degrees and at a Reynolds number based on chord length Re = 1x106. Analysis of the resultant data revealed that the aerodynamic performance of the S811 and S818 airfoils superseded that of the S809 and S814 airfoils. To illustrate, at the critical angle of attack, S811 and S818 were observed to possess the maximum lift and minimum drag coefficients. Furthermore, in the range of attack angles between 10 and 16 degrees, these airfoils consistently demonstrated lower drag than the others tested, enhancing overall aerodynamic performance. These findings underscore the significant role played by airfoil geometry in influencing aerodynamic performance and provide insights into optimal design parameters for wind turbine blades, particularly highlighting the advantages of the S811 and S818 airfoil shapes. In addition, the effect of the unsteady structures in the near-wake zone behind the trailing was also evaluated through turbulence kinetic energy contours. The results revealed a decrease in turbulence kinetic energy when the S811 and S818 airfoils were placed in a cross-flow compared to the S809 and S814 airfoils. This indicates that the strength of the vortex shedding of these airfoils is lower than that of the S809 and S8014 airfoils.https://etj.uotechnology.edu.iq/article_180794_0f61cfcfd5c4b3dc71cd4cb6eb32a3d3.pdfthick airfoil sseries airfoils horizontal axis wind turbine cfd wind turbine
spellingShingle Hamzah Jaffar
Laith Al-Sadawi
Abdulkareem Khudair
Till Biedermann
Aerodynamic Characteristics Evaluation of S-Series Airfoils
Engineering and Technology Journal
thick airfoil s
series airfoils horizontal axis wind turbine cfd wind turbine
title Aerodynamic Characteristics Evaluation of S-Series Airfoils
title_full Aerodynamic Characteristics Evaluation of S-Series Airfoils
title_fullStr Aerodynamic Characteristics Evaluation of S-Series Airfoils
title_full_unstemmed Aerodynamic Characteristics Evaluation of S-Series Airfoils
title_short Aerodynamic Characteristics Evaluation of S-Series Airfoils
title_sort aerodynamic characteristics evaluation of s series airfoils
topic thick airfoil s
series airfoils horizontal axis wind turbine cfd wind turbine
url https://etj.uotechnology.edu.iq/article_180794_0f61cfcfd5c4b3dc71cd4cb6eb32a3d3.pdf
work_keys_str_mv AT hamzahjaffar aerodynamiccharacteristicsevaluationofsseriesairfoils
AT laithalsadawi aerodynamiccharacteristicsevaluationofsseriesairfoils
AT abdulkareemkhudair aerodynamiccharacteristicsevaluationofsseriesairfoils
AT tillbiedermann aerodynamiccharacteristicsevaluationofsseriesairfoils