Risk-adjusted cUSUM control charts for shared frailty survival models with application to hip replacement outcomes: a study using the NJR dataset

Abstract Background Continuous monitoring of surgical outcomes after joint replacement is needed to detect which brands’ components have a higher than expected failure rate and are therefore no longer recommended to be used in surgical practice. We developed a monitoring method based on cumulative s...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Alexander Begun, Elena Kulinskaya, Alexander J MacGregor
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMC 2019-11-01
Series:BMC Medical Research Methodology
Subjects:
Online Access:http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s12874-019-0853-2
_version_ 1818953985838546944
author Alexander Begun
Elena Kulinskaya
Alexander J MacGregor
author_facet Alexander Begun
Elena Kulinskaya
Alexander J MacGregor
author_sort Alexander Begun
collection DOAJ
description Abstract Background Continuous monitoring of surgical outcomes after joint replacement is needed to detect which brands’ components have a higher than expected failure rate and are therefore no longer recommended to be used in surgical practice. We developed a monitoring method based on cumulative sum (CUSUM) chart specifically for this application. Methods Our method entails the use of the competing risks model with the Weibull and the Gompertz hazard functions adjusted for observed covariates to approximate the baseline time-to-revision and time-to-death distributions, respectively. The correlated shared frailty terms for competing risks, corresponding to the operating unit, are also included in the model. A bootstrap-based boundary adjustment is then required for risk-adjusted CUSUM charts to guarantee a given probability of the false alarm rates. We propose a method to evaluate the CUSUM scores and the adjusted boundary for a survival model with the shared frailty terms. We also introduce a unit performance quality score based on the posterior frailty distribution. This method is illustrated using the 2003-2012 hip replacement data from the UK National Joint Registry (NJR). Results We found that the best model included the shared frailty for revision but not for death. This means that the competing risks of revision and death are independent in NJR data. Our method was superior to the standard NJR methodology. For one of the two monitored components, it produced alarms four years before the increased failure rate came to the attention of the UK regulatory authorities. The hazard ratios of revision across the units varied from 0.38 to 2.28. Conclusions An earlier detection of failure signal by our method in comparison to the standard method used by the NJR may be explained by proper risk-adjustment and the ability to accommodate time-dependent hazards. The continuous monitoring of hip replacement outcomes should include risk adjustment at both the individual and unit level.
first_indexed 2024-12-20T10:14:59Z
format Article
id doaj.art-50e7ce810a9c4bbe93f978b6c223a376
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1471-2288
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-20T10:14:59Z
publishDate 2019-11-01
publisher BMC
record_format Article
series BMC Medical Research Methodology
spelling doaj.art-50e7ce810a9c4bbe93f978b6c223a3762022-12-21T19:44:06ZengBMCBMC Medical Research Methodology1471-22882019-11-0119111510.1186/s12874-019-0853-2Risk-adjusted cUSUM control charts for shared frailty survival models with application to hip replacement outcomes: a study using the NJR datasetAlexander Begun0Elena Kulinskaya1Alexander J MacGregor2School of Computing Sciences, University of East AngliaSchool of Computing Sciences, University of East AngliaNorwich Medical School, University of East AngliaAbstract Background Continuous monitoring of surgical outcomes after joint replacement is needed to detect which brands’ components have a higher than expected failure rate and are therefore no longer recommended to be used in surgical practice. We developed a monitoring method based on cumulative sum (CUSUM) chart specifically for this application. Methods Our method entails the use of the competing risks model with the Weibull and the Gompertz hazard functions adjusted for observed covariates to approximate the baseline time-to-revision and time-to-death distributions, respectively. The correlated shared frailty terms for competing risks, corresponding to the operating unit, are also included in the model. A bootstrap-based boundary adjustment is then required for risk-adjusted CUSUM charts to guarantee a given probability of the false alarm rates. We propose a method to evaluate the CUSUM scores and the adjusted boundary for a survival model with the shared frailty terms. We also introduce a unit performance quality score based on the posterior frailty distribution. This method is illustrated using the 2003-2012 hip replacement data from the UK National Joint Registry (NJR). Results We found that the best model included the shared frailty for revision but not for death. This means that the competing risks of revision and death are independent in NJR data. Our method was superior to the standard NJR methodology. For one of the two monitored components, it produced alarms four years before the increased failure rate came to the attention of the UK regulatory authorities. The hazard ratios of revision across the units varied from 0.38 to 2.28. Conclusions An earlier detection of failure signal by our method in comparison to the standard method used by the NJR may be explained by proper risk-adjustment and the ability to accommodate time-dependent hazards. The continuous monitoring of hip replacement outcomes should include risk adjustment at both the individual and unit level.http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s12874-019-0853-2CUSUM chartsBaseline hazard functionRisk adjustmentCompeting risksShared frailtyBootstrap
spellingShingle Alexander Begun
Elena Kulinskaya
Alexander J MacGregor
Risk-adjusted cUSUM control charts for shared frailty survival models with application to hip replacement outcomes: a study using the NJR dataset
BMC Medical Research Methodology
CUSUM charts
Baseline hazard function
Risk adjustment
Competing risks
Shared frailty
Bootstrap
title Risk-adjusted cUSUM control charts for shared frailty survival models with application to hip replacement outcomes: a study using the NJR dataset
title_full Risk-adjusted cUSUM control charts for shared frailty survival models with application to hip replacement outcomes: a study using the NJR dataset
title_fullStr Risk-adjusted cUSUM control charts for shared frailty survival models with application to hip replacement outcomes: a study using the NJR dataset
title_full_unstemmed Risk-adjusted cUSUM control charts for shared frailty survival models with application to hip replacement outcomes: a study using the NJR dataset
title_short Risk-adjusted cUSUM control charts for shared frailty survival models with application to hip replacement outcomes: a study using the NJR dataset
title_sort risk adjusted cusum control charts for shared frailty survival models with application to hip replacement outcomes a study using the njr dataset
topic CUSUM charts
Baseline hazard function
Risk adjustment
Competing risks
Shared frailty
Bootstrap
url http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s12874-019-0853-2
work_keys_str_mv AT alexanderbegun riskadjustedcusumcontrolchartsforsharedfrailtysurvivalmodelswithapplicationtohipreplacementoutcomesastudyusingthenjrdataset
AT elenakulinskaya riskadjustedcusumcontrolchartsforsharedfrailtysurvivalmodelswithapplicationtohipreplacementoutcomesastudyusingthenjrdataset
AT alexanderjmacgregor riskadjustedcusumcontrolchartsforsharedfrailtysurvivalmodelswithapplicationtohipreplacementoutcomesastudyusingthenjrdataset