Evaluation of Five Medicinal Plant Extracts on <i>Aphis craccivora</i> (Hemiptera: Aphididae) and Its Predator, <i>Chrysoperla carnea</i> (Neuroptera: Chrysopidae) under Laboratory Conditions
Botanical insecticides that degrade rapidly are safer than persistent synthetic chemical insecticides, less harmful to the environment, decrease production costs and are not likely to cause insecticide resistance among pests. This study aimed to evaluate the effect of five different botanical extrac...
Main Authors: | , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
MDPI AG
2020-06-01
|
Series: | Insects |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://www.mdpi.com/2075-4450/11/6/398 |
_version_ | 1797564072261058560 |
---|---|
author | Samy M. Sayed Saqer S. Alotaibi Nevien Gaber Sayed-Ashraf Elarrnaouty |
author_facet | Samy M. Sayed Saqer S. Alotaibi Nevien Gaber Sayed-Ashraf Elarrnaouty |
author_sort | Samy M. Sayed |
collection | DOAJ |
description | Botanical insecticides that degrade rapidly are safer than persistent synthetic chemical insecticides, less harmful to the environment, decrease production costs and are not likely to cause insecticide resistance among pests. This study aimed to evaluate the effect of five different botanical extracts on the bean aphid, <i>Aphis craccivora</i> and the 2nd larval instar of the green lacewing, <i>Chrysoperla carnea</i> under laboratory conditions. Also, the flavonoids in the methanolic extracts of these tested plants were detected using HPLC analysis. The data from the HPLC analysis indicated that the tested plants differed in their flavonoid components. The total flavonoids were 869.4, 1125.6, 721.4, 1667.8 and 2025.9 mg/kg in <i>Psiadia penninervia</i>, <i>Salvia officinalis</i>, <i>Ochradenus baccatus</i>, <i>Pulicaria crispa</i> and <i>Euryops arabicus</i>, respectively. Moreover, there were many variations among these plants in the amount of each compound. The lethal concentration (LC<sub>50</sub>) value of <i>P. penninervia</i> extract on aphids was the lowest among all of the plants (128.546 µg/mL) followed by <i>O. baccatus</i> (626.461 µg/mL). Also, the LC<sub>50</sub> value of <i>P. penninervia</i> extract on the 2nd larval instar of <i>C. carnea</i> (232.095 µg/mL) was significantly lower than those of all other four plant species extracts, while the other four plants did not show significant differences among them according to relative median potency analyses. Accordingly, <i>O. baccatus</i> extract had a strong effect on aphids and was safest for the predator. This finding suggests that <i>O. baccatus</i> could be exploited and further developed as an effective plant extract-based insecticide to be utilized in integrated pest management (IPM) programs against <i>A. craccivora</i>. |
first_indexed | 2024-03-10T18:52:15Z |
format | Article |
id | doaj.art-50e8ded3d42340d69d0e2c7b84a1dde0 |
institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
issn | 2075-4450 |
language | English |
last_indexed | 2024-03-10T18:52:15Z |
publishDate | 2020-06-01 |
publisher | MDPI AG |
record_format | Article |
series | Insects |
spelling | doaj.art-50e8ded3d42340d69d0e2c7b84a1dde02023-11-20T05:03:25ZengMDPI AGInsects2075-44502020-06-0111639810.3390/insects11060398Evaluation of Five Medicinal Plant Extracts on <i>Aphis craccivora</i> (Hemiptera: Aphididae) and Its Predator, <i>Chrysoperla carnea</i> (Neuroptera: Chrysopidae) under Laboratory ConditionsSamy M. Sayed0Saqer S. Alotaibi1Nevien Gaber2Sayed-Ashraf Elarrnaouty3Department of Economic Entomology and Pesticides, Faculty of Agriculture, Cairo University, Giza 12613, EgyptDepartment of Biotechnology, Faculty of Science, Taif University, Taif 888, Saudi ArabiaPlant Protection Research Institute, Agricultural Research Center, Dokki, Giza 12619, EgyptDepartment of Economic Entomology and Pesticides, Faculty of Agriculture, Cairo University, Giza 12613, EgyptBotanical insecticides that degrade rapidly are safer than persistent synthetic chemical insecticides, less harmful to the environment, decrease production costs and are not likely to cause insecticide resistance among pests. This study aimed to evaluate the effect of five different botanical extracts on the bean aphid, <i>Aphis craccivora</i> and the 2nd larval instar of the green lacewing, <i>Chrysoperla carnea</i> under laboratory conditions. Also, the flavonoids in the methanolic extracts of these tested plants were detected using HPLC analysis. The data from the HPLC analysis indicated that the tested plants differed in their flavonoid components. The total flavonoids were 869.4, 1125.6, 721.4, 1667.8 and 2025.9 mg/kg in <i>Psiadia penninervia</i>, <i>Salvia officinalis</i>, <i>Ochradenus baccatus</i>, <i>Pulicaria crispa</i> and <i>Euryops arabicus</i>, respectively. Moreover, there were many variations among these plants in the amount of each compound. The lethal concentration (LC<sub>50</sub>) value of <i>P. penninervia</i> extract on aphids was the lowest among all of the plants (128.546 µg/mL) followed by <i>O. baccatus</i> (626.461 µg/mL). Also, the LC<sub>50</sub> value of <i>P. penninervia</i> extract on the 2nd larval instar of <i>C. carnea</i> (232.095 µg/mL) was significantly lower than those of all other four plant species extracts, while the other four plants did not show significant differences among them according to relative median potency analyses. Accordingly, <i>O. baccatus</i> extract had a strong effect on aphids and was safest for the predator. This finding suggests that <i>O. baccatus</i> could be exploited and further developed as an effective plant extract-based insecticide to be utilized in integrated pest management (IPM) programs against <i>A. craccivora</i>.https://www.mdpi.com/2075-4450/11/6/398biopesticidebiological controlbotanical insecticideslacewingintegrated pest management |
spellingShingle | Samy M. Sayed Saqer S. Alotaibi Nevien Gaber Sayed-Ashraf Elarrnaouty Evaluation of Five Medicinal Plant Extracts on <i>Aphis craccivora</i> (Hemiptera: Aphididae) and Its Predator, <i>Chrysoperla carnea</i> (Neuroptera: Chrysopidae) under Laboratory Conditions Insects biopesticide biological control botanical insecticides lacewing integrated pest management |
title | Evaluation of Five Medicinal Plant Extracts on <i>Aphis craccivora</i> (Hemiptera: Aphididae) and Its Predator, <i>Chrysoperla carnea</i> (Neuroptera: Chrysopidae) under Laboratory Conditions |
title_full | Evaluation of Five Medicinal Plant Extracts on <i>Aphis craccivora</i> (Hemiptera: Aphididae) and Its Predator, <i>Chrysoperla carnea</i> (Neuroptera: Chrysopidae) under Laboratory Conditions |
title_fullStr | Evaluation of Five Medicinal Plant Extracts on <i>Aphis craccivora</i> (Hemiptera: Aphididae) and Its Predator, <i>Chrysoperla carnea</i> (Neuroptera: Chrysopidae) under Laboratory Conditions |
title_full_unstemmed | Evaluation of Five Medicinal Plant Extracts on <i>Aphis craccivora</i> (Hemiptera: Aphididae) and Its Predator, <i>Chrysoperla carnea</i> (Neuroptera: Chrysopidae) under Laboratory Conditions |
title_short | Evaluation of Five Medicinal Plant Extracts on <i>Aphis craccivora</i> (Hemiptera: Aphididae) and Its Predator, <i>Chrysoperla carnea</i> (Neuroptera: Chrysopidae) under Laboratory Conditions |
title_sort | evaluation of five medicinal plant extracts on i aphis craccivora i hemiptera aphididae and its predator i chrysoperla carnea i neuroptera chrysopidae under laboratory conditions |
topic | biopesticide biological control botanical insecticides lacewing integrated pest management |
url | https://www.mdpi.com/2075-4450/11/6/398 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT samymsayed evaluationoffivemedicinalplantextractsoniaphiscraccivoraihemipteraaphididaeanditspredatorichrysoperlacarneaineuropterachrysopidaeunderlaboratoryconditions AT saqersalotaibi evaluationoffivemedicinalplantextractsoniaphiscraccivoraihemipteraaphididaeanditspredatorichrysoperlacarneaineuropterachrysopidaeunderlaboratoryconditions AT neviengaber evaluationoffivemedicinalplantextractsoniaphiscraccivoraihemipteraaphididaeanditspredatorichrysoperlacarneaineuropterachrysopidaeunderlaboratoryconditions AT sayedashrafelarrnaouty evaluationoffivemedicinalplantextractsoniaphiscraccivoraihemipteraaphididaeanditspredatorichrysoperlacarneaineuropterachrysopidaeunderlaboratoryconditions |