Foreword. Finalism and Judgement

What does it mean to “judge” something? What are the preconditions and the necessary prerequisites for the formulation of a judgement (be it a cognitive judgement, a moral judgement, or an aesthetic judgement)? Is there a special relationship between finalism and judgement and, if yes, in what sense...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Fabrizio Desideri, Mariagrazia Portera
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Firenze University Press 2021-12-01
Series:Aisthesis
Online Access:https://oajournals.fupress.net/index.php/aisthesis/article/view/13336
_version_ 1818283350144581632
author Fabrizio Desideri
Mariagrazia Portera
author_facet Fabrizio Desideri
Mariagrazia Portera
author_sort Fabrizio Desideri
collection DOAJ
description What does it mean to “judge” something? What are the preconditions and the necessary prerequisites for the formulation of a judgement (be it a cognitive judgement, a moral judgement, or an aesthetic judgement)? Is there a special relationship between finalism and judgement and, if yes, in what sense? The relationship between finalism and judgment has been typically understood along two main lines of interpretation: on the one hand, as the finalism attributed by judging to certain objects or phenomena; on the other hand, from the point of view of the finality of judging itself, i.e., the teleological orientation of judging in the global dimension of life. This issue of Aisthesis includes a selection of highly relevant contributions to the topic “Judgement and finalism”, with the aim of bringing to the fore the circular movement that seems to characterize every judgement in itself – from nature, and from the nature of our mind, to the objects, structures, natural kinds etc. that populate the world, and reversely from the world to the mind. Kant’s Critique of the Power of Judgement plays, in this respect, a very fundamental role, as the papers by Stefano Velotti, Luigi Filieri, Lorenzo Sala, and Antonio Branca show brilliantly. Andrea Lanza and Barbara Santini discuss the interconnections between teleology and judgement in the frame, respectively, of Husserl’s phenomenology and Friedrich Hölderlin’s poetic philosophy. The idea that finalism and the dynamics of judgement have much to do with each other opens new links to disciplines other than philosophy and to an interdisciplinary approach to the activity of judging in research fields such as psychology, cognitive sciences, biology. This is the perspective adopted by Francesco Vitale, in his paper on Ernst Mayr’s teleonomy, and by Onerva Kiianlinna, in her a paper on epigenesis and modularity in Evolutionary Aesthetics. This present issue is further enriched by a substantial focus on images and the aesthetic experience in the digital age (Fabrizio Desideri, Francesca Perotto, Caterina Zaira) and by a multifaceted and intriguing “Varia” section, with contributions by Ricardo Ibarlucia, Mariya Veleva, David Alvaro Gonzàlez, Carmelo Colangelo.
first_indexed 2024-12-13T00:35:30Z
format Article
id doaj.art-51048c2e33d04ddbb159d97954d0d5fc
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2035-8466
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-13T00:35:30Z
publishDate 2021-12-01
publisher Firenze University Press
record_format Article
series Aisthesis
spelling doaj.art-51048c2e33d04ddbb159d97954d0d5fc2022-12-22T00:05:13ZengFirenze University PressAisthesis2035-84662021-12-0114210.36253/Aisthesis-13336Foreword. Finalism and JudgementFabrizio DesideriMariagrazia PorteraWhat does it mean to “judge” something? What are the preconditions and the necessary prerequisites for the formulation of a judgement (be it a cognitive judgement, a moral judgement, or an aesthetic judgement)? Is there a special relationship between finalism and judgement and, if yes, in what sense? The relationship between finalism and judgment has been typically understood along two main lines of interpretation: on the one hand, as the finalism attributed by judging to certain objects or phenomena; on the other hand, from the point of view of the finality of judging itself, i.e., the teleological orientation of judging in the global dimension of life. This issue of Aisthesis includes a selection of highly relevant contributions to the topic “Judgement and finalism”, with the aim of bringing to the fore the circular movement that seems to characterize every judgement in itself – from nature, and from the nature of our mind, to the objects, structures, natural kinds etc. that populate the world, and reversely from the world to the mind. Kant’s Critique of the Power of Judgement plays, in this respect, a very fundamental role, as the papers by Stefano Velotti, Luigi Filieri, Lorenzo Sala, and Antonio Branca show brilliantly. Andrea Lanza and Barbara Santini discuss the interconnections between teleology and judgement in the frame, respectively, of Husserl’s phenomenology and Friedrich Hölderlin’s poetic philosophy. The idea that finalism and the dynamics of judgement have much to do with each other opens new links to disciplines other than philosophy and to an interdisciplinary approach to the activity of judging in research fields such as psychology, cognitive sciences, biology. This is the perspective adopted by Francesco Vitale, in his paper on Ernst Mayr’s teleonomy, and by Onerva Kiianlinna, in her a paper on epigenesis and modularity in Evolutionary Aesthetics. This present issue is further enriched by a substantial focus on images and the aesthetic experience in the digital age (Fabrizio Desideri, Francesca Perotto, Caterina Zaira) and by a multifaceted and intriguing “Varia” section, with contributions by Ricardo Ibarlucia, Mariya Veleva, David Alvaro Gonzàlez, Carmelo Colangelo.https://oajournals.fupress.net/index.php/aisthesis/article/view/13336
spellingShingle Fabrizio Desideri
Mariagrazia Portera
Foreword. Finalism and Judgement
Aisthesis
title Foreword. Finalism and Judgement
title_full Foreword. Finalism and Judgement
title_fullStr Foreword. Finalism and Judgement
title_full_unstemmed Foreword. Finalism and Judgement
title_short Foreword. Finalism and Judgement
title_sort foreword finalism and judgement
url https://oajournals.fupress.net/index.php/aisthesis/article/view/13336
work_keys_str_mv AT fabriziodesideri forewordfinalismandjudgement
AT mariagraziaportera forewordfinalismandjudgement