Impact of RbF-PDT on Cu(In,Ga)Se2 solar cells with CdS and Zn(O,S) buffer layers

Alkali-fluoride post-deposition treatments (PDTs) of Cu(In,Ga)Se2 (CIGS) absorbers have repeatedly resulted in device efficiency improvements, observed mainly due to an open-circuit voltage (Voc) enhancement. Replacement of the CdS buffer layer with a higher band gap alternative can increase the sho...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Kanevce Ana, Paetel Stefan, Hariskos Dimitrios, Magorian Friedlmeier Theresa
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: EDP Sciences 2020-01-01
Series:EPJ Photovoltaics
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.epj-pv.org/articles/epjpv/full_html/2020/01/pv200011/pv200011.html
_version_ 1818779168216711168
author Kanevce Ana
Paetel Stefan
Hariskos Dimitrios
Magorian Friedlmeier Theresa
author_facet Kanevce Ana
Paetel Stefan
Hariskos Dimitrios
Magorian Friedlmeier Theresa
author_sort Kanevce Ana
collection DOAJ
description Alkali-fluoride post-deposition treatments (PDTs) of Cu(In,Ga)Se2 (CIGS) absorbers have repeatedly resulted in device efficiency improvements, observed mainly due to an open-circuit voltage (Voc) enhancement. Replacement of the CdS buffer layer with a higher band gap alternative can increase the short-circuit current density (Jsc) and also eliminate the use of Cd. In many alternative-buffer attempts, however, the Jsc gain was accompanied by a Voc loss, resulting in some degree of performance loss. In order to better understand the impact of RbF-PDT, we analyze a combination of experimental devices produced in the same in-line CIGS run with and without RbF-PDT in combination with chemical-bath-deposited CdS and Zn(O,S) buffers. Low-temperature current–voltage curves indicate a difference in Rb impact on the CIGS/CdS and CIGS/Zn(O,S) p-n junctions. For example, the diode-current barrier which creates a rollover often observed in RbF-treated CIGS/CdS current–voltage curves is significantly reduced for the CIGS/Zn(O,S) junction. Although the RbF-PDT had a positive impact on both junction partner combinations, the CIGS/Zn(O,S) devices' Voc and fill factor (FF) benefited stronger from the RbF treatment. As a result, in our samples, the Jsc and FF gain balanced the Voc loss, thus reducing the efficiency difference between cells with CdS and Zn(O,S) buffers.
first_indexed 2024-12-18T11:56:19Z
format Article
id doaj.art-510e38266767484cb7f047410a717122
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2105-0716
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-18T11:56:19Z
publishDate 2020-01-01
publisher EDP Sciences
record_format Article
series EPJ Photovoltaics
spelling doaj.art-510e38266767484cb7f047410a7171222022-12-21T21:09:02ZengEDP SciencesEPJ Photovoltaics2105-07162020-01-0111810.1051/epjpv/2020005pv200011Impact of RbF-PDT on Cu(In,Ga)Se2 solar cells with CdS and Zn(O,S) buffer layersKanevce AnaPaetel StefanHariskos DimitriosMagorian Friedlmeier TheresaAlkali-fluoride post-deposition treatments (PDTs) of Cu(In,Ga)Se2 (CIGS) absorbers have repeatedly resulted in device efficiency improvements, observed mainly due to an open-circuit voltage (Voc) enhancement. Replacement of the CdS buffer layer with a higher band gap alternative can increase the short-circuit current density (Jsc) and also eliminate the use of Cd. In many alternative-buffer attempts, however, the Jsc gain was accompanied by a Voc loss, resulting in some degree of performance loss. In order to better understand the impact of RbF-PDT, we analyze a combination of experimental devices produced in the same in-line CIGS run with and without RbF-PDT in combination with chemical-bath-deposited CdS and Zn(O,S) buffers. Low-temperature current–voltage curves indicate a difference in Rb impact on the CIGS/CdS and CIGS/Zn(O,S) p-n junctions. For example, the diode-current barrier which creates a rollover often observed in RbF-treated CIGS/CdS current–voltage curves is significantly reduced for the CIGS/Zn(O,S) junction. Although the RbF-PDT had a positive impact on both junction partner combinations, the CIGS/Zn(O,S) devices' Voc and fill factor (FF) benefited stronger from the RbF treatment. As a result, in our samples, the Jsc and FF gain balanced the Voc loss, thus reducing the efficiency difference between cells with CdS and Zn(O,S) buffers.https://www.epj-pv.org/articles/epjpv/full_html/2020/01/pv200011/pv200011.htmlcigs solar cellsrbf-pdtzn(o,s)characterization
spellingShingle Kanevce Ana
Paetel Stefan
Hariskos Dimitrios
Magorian Friedlmeier Theresa
Impact of RbF-PDT on Cu(In,Ga)Se2 solar cells with CdS and Zn(O,S) buffer layers
EPJ Photovoltaics
cigs solar cells
rbf-pdt
zn(o,s)
characterization
title Impact of RbF-PDT on Cu(In,Ga)Se2 solar cells with CdS and Zn(O,S) buffer layers
title_full Impact of RbF-PDT on Cu(In,Ga)Se2 solar cells with CdS and Zn(O,S) buffer layers
title_fullStr Impact of RbF-PDT on Cu(In,Ga)Se2 solar cells with CdS and Zn(O,S) buffer layers
title_full_unstemmed Impact of RbF-PDT on Cu(In,Ga)Se2 solar cells with CdS and Zn(O,S) buffer layers
title_short Impact of RbF-PDT on Cu(In,Ga)Se2 solar cells with CdS and Zn(O,S) buffer layers
title_sort impact of rbf pdt on cu in ga se2 solar cells with cds and zn o s buffer layers
topic cigs solar cells
rbf-pdt
zn(o,s)
characterization
url https://www.epj-pv.org/articles/epjpv/full_html/2020/01/pv200011/pv200011.html
work_keys_str_mv AT kanevceana impactofrbfpdtoncuingase2solarcellswithcdsandznosbufferlayers
AT paetelstefan impactofrbfpdtoncuingase2solarcellswithcdsandznosbufferlayers
AT hariskosdimitrios impactofrbfpdtoncuingase2solarcellswithcdsandznosbufferlayers
AT magorianfriedlmeiertheresa impactofrbfpdtoncuingase2solarcellswithcdsandznosbufferlayers