Appraising and highlighting gaps among prophylactic intervention studies for reducing the incidence of postoperative nausea and vomiting in children: a systematic review

Objectives Postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV) is a leading perioperative morbidity outcome following general anaesthesia. This systematic review aims to identify, appraise and summarise the evidence synthesis studies of prophylactic interventions that reduce the incidence of paediatric PONV, t...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Maria-Alexandra Petre, Marina Englesakis, Kazuyoshi Aoyama, Evelina Pankiv, Jessica Nghiem, Alfonso Ernesto Albornoz, Mehwish Rana, Jason Hayes, Conor Mc Donnell
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMJ Publishing Group 2024-02-01
Series:BMJ Open
Online Access:https://bmjopen.bmj.com/content/14/2/e070775.full
_version_ 1797269177818415104
author Maria-Alexandra Petre
Marina Englesakis
Kazuyoshi Aoyama
Evelina Pankiv
Jessica Nghiem
Alfonso Ernesto Albornoz
Mehwish Rana
Jason Hayes
Conor Mc Donnell
author_facet Maria-Alexandra Petre
Marina Englesakis
Kazuyoshi Aoyama
Evelina Pankiv
Jessica Nghiem
Alfonso Ernesto Albornoz
Mehwish Rana
Jason Hayes
Conor Mc Donnell
author_sort Maria-Alexandra Petre
collection DOAJ
description Objectives Postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV) is a leading perioperative morbidity outcome following general anaesthesia. This systematic review aims to identify, appraise and summarise the evidence synthesis studies of prophylactic interventions that reduce the incidence of paediatric PONV, thereby highlighting knowledge gaps and avenues of future research.Design Systematic review using the AMSTAR-2 (A MeaSurement Tool to Assess Systematic Reviews 2) tool and the ROBIS (Risk Of Bias In Systematic reviews) tool.Data sources Seven major databases, including MEDLINE and EMBASE, from inception to 23 September 2022.Eligibility criteria for selecting studies Evidence synthesis studies of only randomised controlled trials that explored prophylactic interventions for PONV in children undergoing general anaesthesia.Data extraction and synthesis Following screening process by two reviewers, data were extracted from all eligible studies, including demographic parameters and details of interventions. Eligible studies were categorised into ‘pharmacological’ and ‘non-pharmacological’ groups and high-risk surgical groups of ‘strabismus’ and ‘tonsillectomy’ for qualitative synthesis.Results There were 20 evidence synthesis reviews (17 meta-analyses, 2 systematic reviews, 1 network meta-analysis): 14 investigated pharmacological PONV prophylaxis in children, 5 investigated non-pharmacological interventions, 1 studied both pharmacological and non-pharmacological interventions. Monotherapy pharmacological prophylaxis agents, for example, dexamethasone (relative risk (RR) 0.49, 95% CI 0.41 to 0.58), 5-hydroxytryptamine (5-HT3) antagonists (OR 0.12, 95% CI 0.07 to 0.20) and α2-adrenoreceptor agonists (dexmedetomidine: RR 0.33, 95% CI 0.21 to 0.54), are more effective than placebo. A combination of pharmacological agents provided superior efficacy to monotherapy, particularly dexamethasone and 5-HT3 antagonists (RR 0.21, 95% credible interval 0.15 to 0.28). Acustimulation practice was consistently favourable in preventing PONV compared with placebo (RR 0.36, 95% CI 0.25 to 0.52).Conclusion Monotherapy pharmacological prophylaxis is more effective than placebo in reducing the incidence of paediatric PONV, with the efficacy increased further by using combination pharmacotherapy. Further research must compare multiple treatment arms of pharmacological and non-pharmacological prophylaxes for PONV to identify the optimal multimodal prophylaxis regimen.PROSPERO registration number CRD42021236698.
first_indexed 2024-03-07T22:56:10Z
format Article
id doaj.art-5111a38d308047349af88f2428f98cfe
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2044-6055
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-25T01:44:14Z
publishDate 2024-02-01
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format Article
series BMJ Open
spelling doaj.art-5111a38d308047349af88f2428f98cfe2024-03-07T22:40:08ZengBMJ Publishing GroupBMJ Open2044-60552024-02-0114210.1136/bmjopen-2022-070775Appraising and highlighting gaps among prophylactic intervention studies for reducing the incidence of postoperative nausea and vomiting in children: a systematic reviewMaria-Alexandra Petre0Marina Englesakis1Kazuyoshi Aoyama2Evelina Pankiv3Jessica Nghiem4Alfonso Ernesto Albornoz5Mehwish Rana6Jason Hayes7Conor Mc Donnell8Department of Pediatric Anesthesia, Montreal Children’s Hospital, Montreal, Quebec, CanadaLibrary and Information Services, University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, CanadaDepartment of Anesthesia and Pain Medicine, The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Ontario, CanadaDepartment of Anesthesia and Pain Medicine, The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Ontario, CanadaDepartment of Anesthesia and Pain Medicine, The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Ontario, CanadaDepartment of Anesthesia and Pain Medicine, The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Ontario, CanadaUniversity of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, CanadaDepartment of Anesthesia and Pain Medicine, The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Ontario, CanadaDepartment of Anesthesia and Pain Medicine, The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Ontario, CanadaObjectives Postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV) is a leading perioperative morbidity outcome following general anaesthesia. This systematic review aims to identify, appraise and summarise the evidence synthesis studies of prophylactic interventions that reduce the incidence of paediatric PONV, thereby highlighting knowledge gaps and avenues of future research.Design Systematic review using the AMSTAR-2 (A MeaSurement Tool to Assess Systematic Reviews 2) tool and the ROBIS (Risk Of Bias In Systematic reviews) tool.Data sources Seven major databases, including MEDLINE and EMBASE, from inception to 23 September 2022.Eligibility criteria for selecting studies Evidence synthesis studies of only randomised controlled trials that explored prophylactic interventions for PONV in children undergoing general anaesthesia.Data extraction and synthesis Following screening process by two reviewers, data were extracted from all eligible studies, including demographic parameters and details of interventions. Eligible studies were categorised into ‘pharmacological’ and ‘non-pharmacological’ groups and high-risk surgical groups of ‘strabismus’ and ‘tonsillectomy’ for qualitative synthesis.Results There were 20 evidence synthesis reviews (17 meta-analyses, 2 systematic reviews, 1 network meta-analysis): 14 investigated pharmacological PONV prophylaxis in children, 5 investigated non-pharmacological interventions, 1 studied both pharmacological and non-pharmacological interventions. Monotherapy pharmacological prophylaxis agents, for example, dexamethasone (relative risk (RR) 0.49, 95% CI 0.41 to 0.58), 5-hydroxytryptamine (5-HT3) antagonists (OR 0.12, 95% CI 0.07 to 0.20) and α2-adrenoreceptor agonists (dexmedetomidine: RR 0.33, 95% CI 0.21 to 0.54), are more effective than placebo. A combination of pharmacological agents provided superior efficacy to monotherapy, particularly dexamethasone and 5-HT3 antagonists (RR 0.21, 95% credible interval 0.15 to 0.28). Acustimulation practice was consistently favourable in preventing PONV compared with placebo (RR 0.36, 95% CI 0.25 to 0.52).Conclusion Monotherapy pharmacological prophylaxis is more effective than placebo in reducing the incidence of paediatric PONV, with the efficacy increased further by using combination pharmacotherapy. Further research must compare multiple treatment arms of pharmacological and non-pharmacological prophylaxes for PONV to identify the optimal multimodal prophylaxis regimen.PROSPERO registration number CRD42021236698.https://bmjopen.bmj.com/content/14/2/e070775.full
spellingShingle Maria-Alexandra Petre
Marina Englesakis
Kazuyoshi Aoyama
Evelina Pankiv
Jessica Nghiem
Alfonso Ernesto Albornoz
Mehwish Rana
Jason Hayes
Conor Mc Donnell
Appraising and highlighting gaps among prophylactic intervention studies for reducing the incidence of postoperative nausea and vomiting in children: a systematic review
BMJ Open
title Appraising and highlighting gaps among prophylactic intervention studies for reducing the incidence of postoperative nausea and vomiting in children: a systematic review
title_full Appraising and highlighting gaps among prophylactic intervention studies for reducing the incidence of postoperative nausea and vomiting in children: a systematic review
title_fullStr Appraising and highlighting gaps among prophylactic intervention studies for reducing the incidence of postoperative nausea and vomiting in children: a systematic review
title_full_unstemmed Appraising and highlighting gaps among prophylactic intervention studies for reducing the incidence of postoperative nausea and vomiting in children: a systematic review
title_short Appraising and highlighting gaps among prophylactic intervention studies for reducing the incidence of postoperative nausea and vomiting in children: a systematic review
title_sort appraising and highlighting gaps among prophylactic intervention studies for reducing the incidence of postoperative nausea and vomiting in children a systematic review
url https://bmjopen.bmj.com/content/14/2/e070775.full
work_keys_str_mv AT mariaalexandrapetre appraisingandhighlightinggapsamongprophylacticinterventionstudiesforreducingtheincidenceofpostoperativenauseaandvomitinginchildrenasystematicreview
AT marinaenglesakis appraisingandhighlightinggapsamongprophylacticinterventionstudiesforreducingtheincidenceofpostoperativenauseaandvomitinginchildrenasystematicreview
AT kazuyoshiaoyama appraisingandhighlightinggapsamongprophylacticinterventionstudiesforreducingtheincidenceofpostoperativenauseaandvomitinginchildrenasystematicreview
AT evelinapankiv appraisingandhighlightinggapsamongprophylacticinterventionstudiesforreducingtheincidenceofpostoperativenauseaandvomitinginchildrenasystematicreview
AT jessicanghiem appraisingandhighlightinggapsamongprophylacticinterventionstudiesforreducingtheincidenceofpostoperativenauseaandvomitinginchildrenasystematicreview
AT alfonsoernestoalbornoz appraisingandhighlightinggapsamongprophylacticinterventionstudiesforreducingtheincidenceofpostoperativenauseaandvomitinginchildrenasystematicreview
AT mehwishrana appraisingandhighlightinggapsamongprophylacticinterventionstudiesforreducingtheincidenceofpostoperativenauseaandvomitinginchildrenasystematicreview
AT jasonhayes appraisingandhighlightinggapsamongprophylacticinterventionstudiesforreducingtheincidenceofpostoperativenauseaandvomitinginchildrenasystematicreview
AT conormcdonnell appraisingandhighlightinggapsamongprophylacticinterventionstudiesforreducingtheincidenceofpostoperativenauseaandvomitinginchildrenasystematicreview