Making Evidence-based Crash Risk Estimation Routine by using the SESA Process

Achieving safe system or vision zero outcomes at high-risk urban intersections, especially priority cross-roads and high volume traffic signals, is a major challenge for most cities. Even after decades of crash analysis and improvement works many of these intersections still perform poorly. While be...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Shane Turner, Paul Durdin, Shendi Mani
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Australasian College of Road Safety 2020-02-01
Series:Journal of Road Safety
Online Access:https://acrs.org.au/files/papers/arsc/2020/Making%20evidence-based%20crash%20risk%20estimation%20routine%20by%20using%20the%20SESA%20process.pdf
_version_ 1818888606049107968
author Shane Turner
Paul Durdin
Shendi Mani
author_facet Shane Turner
Paul Durdin
Shendi Mani
author_sort Shane Turner
collection DOAJ
description Achieving safe system or vision zero outcomes at high-risk urban intersections, especially priority cross-roads and high volume traffic signals, is a major challenge for most cities. Even after decades of crash analysis and improvement works many of these intersections still perform poorly. While best practice for optimising the efficiency of intersections requires the use of modelling tools, like Sidra, this is rarely the case with optimising road safety outcomes. This is despite the large number of evidence-based safety analysis models and tools that are now available to understand intersection crash risk. This paper outlines the SESA (Site-specific Evidence-based Safety Analysis) Process that has been developed to enable transport professionals to estimate and predict crash risk at intersections and other sites. This process utilises existing crash risk estimation tools (based on crash prediction models and crash reduction factors), relevant road safety research, crash severity factors, professional judgement and crash data to predict the underlying crash risk at intersections (and other sites) and the effectiveness of improvement options. The output includes both the number and return period of ‘all injury’ and ‘fatal and serious injury (FSI)’ crashes for each option. The paper includes three applications of the process to high risk intersections in three New Zealand cities, consisting of two priority cross-roads and one high speed roundabout. The case studies demonstrate how the process can be used to assess intersection features and improvement options that are not covered within the available crash estimation tools.
first_indexed 2024-12-19T16:55:47Z
format Article
id doaj.art-5120108da24344f28bd56baa5e2de300
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2652-4260
2652-4252
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-19T16:55:47Z
publishDate 2020-02-01
publisher Australasian College of Road Safety
record_format Article
series Journal of Road Safety
spelling doaj.art-5120108da24344f28bd56baa5e2de3002022-12-21T20:13:25ZengAustralasian College of Road SafetyJournal of Road Safety2652-42602652-42522020-02-01311405010.33492/JRS-D-19-00125Making Evidence-based Crash Risk Estimation Routine by using the SESA ProcessShane TurnerPaul DurdinShendi ManiAchieving safe system or vision zero outcomes at high-risk urban intersections, especially priority cross-roads and high volume traffic signals, is a major challenge for most cities. Even after decades of crash analysis and improvement works many of these intersections still perform poorly. While best practice for optimising the efficiency of intersections requires the use of modelling tools, like Sidra, this is rarely the case with optimising road safety outcomes. This is despite the large number of evidence-based safety analysis models and tools that are now available to understand intersection crash risk. This paper outlines the SESA (Site-specific Evidence-based Safety Analysis) Process that has been developed to enable transport professionals to estimate and predict crash risk at intersections and other sites. This process utilises existing crash risk estimation tools (based on crash prediction models and crash reduction factors), relevant road safety research, crash severity factors, professional judgement and crash data to predict the underlying crash risk at intersections (and other sites) and the effectiveness of improvement options. The output includes both the number and return period of ‘all injury’ and ‘fatal and serious injury (FSI)’ crashes for each option. The paper includes three applications of the process to high risk intersections in three New Zealand cities, consisting of two priority cross-roads and one high speed roundabout. The case studies demonstrate how the process can be used to assess intersection features and improvement options that are not covered within the available crash estimation tools.https://acrs.org.au/files/papers/arsc/2020/Making%20evidence-based%20crash%20risk%20estimation%20routine%20by%20using%20the%20SESA%20process.pdf
spellingShingle Shane Turner
Paul Durdin
Shendi Mani
Making Evidence-based Crash Risk Estimation Routine by using the SESA Process
Journal of Road Safety
title Making Evidence-based Crash Risk Estimation Routine by using the SESA Process
title_full Making Evidence-based Crash Risk Estimation Routine by using the SESA Process
title_fullStr Making Evidence-based Crash Risk Estimation Routine by using the SESA Process
title_full_unstemmed Making Evidence-based Crash Risk Estimation Routine by using the SESA Process
title_short Making Evidence-based Crash Risk Estimation Routine by using the SESA Process
title_sort making evidence based crash risk estimation routine by using the sesa process
url https://acrs.org.au/files/papers/arsc/2020/Making%20evidence-based%20crash%20risk%20estimation%20routine%20by%20using%20the%20SESA%20process.pdf
work_keys_str_mv AT shaneturner makingevidencebasedcrashriskestimationroutinebyusingthesesaprocess
AT pauldurdin makingevidencebasedcrashriskestimationroutinebyusingthesesaprocess
AT shendimani makingevidencebasedcrashriskestimationroutinebyusingthesesaprocess