Analysis of Geogrid Reinforced Structures with a Passive Facing System Using Different Computational Methods

The article deals with designing and analysing a wrapped geogrid reinforced structure (GRS) with a passive facing system. The analysis has been done using analytical calculation and numerical modelling. The analytical calculations were executed using FINE Geo5 geotechnical software, and numerical mo...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Sulovska Monika, Stacho Jakub
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Sciendo 2021-12-01
Series:Civil and Environmental Engineering
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.2478/cee-2021-0052
_version_ 1811226139238072320
author Sulovska Monika
Stacho Jakub
author_facet Sulovska Monika
Stacho Jakub
author_sort Sulovska Monika
collection DOAJ
description The article deals with designing and analysing a wrapped geogrid reinforced structure (GRS) with a passive facing system. The analysis has been done using analytical calculation and numerical modelling. The analytical calculations were executed using FINE Geo5 geotechnical software, and numerical modelling was executed using Plaxis 2D software. The analysis is focused mainly on comparing tension forces in geogrids and the stability of the reinforced embankment determined using both computational methods. The deformation analysis was done only using numerical modelling. The numerical modelling allowed for a more detailed analysis of the wrapped GRS. Each construction phase was modelled step by step according to an actual construction procedure. Two complex road embankments supported by GRS were modelled and analysed. The first model consisted of three GRS, which not affected each other. In the second model, the GRS at each side of the embankment influenced each other. The analysis results showed that tension forces in geogrids, determined using both computational methods, can differ significantly from each other. The stability of the reinforced embankment determined using numerical modelling was within the range of 0.87 – 1.22 of the stability determined using analytical calculation. The numerical modelling results showed that the final horizontal deformation of the passive facing is about 2.8 – 3.8 times smaller than the deformation of the wrapped GRS, which occurs during the construction of the embankment.
first_indexed 2024-04-12T09:19:15Z
format Article
id doaj.art-5135102fb8594fa79a31a7120a1d1033
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2199-6512
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-12T09:19:15Z
publishDate 2021-12-01
publisher Sciendo
record_format Article
series Civil and Environmental Engineering
spelling doaj.art-5135102fb8594fa79a31a7120a1d10332022-12-22T03:38:42ZengSciendoCivil and Environmental Engineering2199-65122021-12-0117250051210.2478/cee-2021-0052Analysis of Geogrid Reinforced Structures with a Passive Facing System Using Different Computational MethodsSulovska Monika0Stacho Jakub1Department of Geotechnics, Faculty of Civil Engineering, Slovak University of Technology in Bratislava, Radlinskeho 11, 810 05Bratislava, Slovakia.Department of Geotechnics, Faculty of Civil Engineering, Slovak University of Technology in Bratislava, Radlinskeho 11, 810 05Bratislava, Slovakia.The article deals with designing and analysing a wrapped geogrid reinforced structure (GRS) with a passive facing system. The analysis has been done using analytical calculation and numerical modelling. The analytical calculations were executed using FINE Geo5 geotechnical software, and numerical modelling was executed using Plaxis 2D software. The analysis is focused mainly on comparing tension forces in geogrids and the stability of the reinforced embankment determined using both computational methods. The deformation analysis was done only using numerical modelling. The numerical modelling allowed for a more detailed analysis of the wrapped GRS. Each construction phase was modelled step by step according to an actual construction procedure. Two complex road embankments supported by GRS were modelled and analysed. The first model consisted of three GRS, which not affected each other. In the second model, the GRS at each side of the embankment influenced each other. The analysis results showed that tension forces in geogrids, determined using both computational methods, can differ significantly from each other. The stability of the reinforced embankment determined using numerical modelling was within the range of 0.87 – 1.22 of the stability determined using analytical calculation. The numerical modelling results showed that the final horizontal deformation of the passive facing is about 2.8 – 3.8 times smaller than the deformation of the wrapped GRS, which occurs during the construction of the embankment.https://doi.org/10.2478/cee-2021-0052geogrid reinforced structurewrapped facingpassive earth system facingreinforced earth structuremechanically stabilized earth wall
spellingShingle Sulovska Monika
Stacho Jakub
Analysis of Geogrid Reinforced Structures with a Passive Facing System Using Different Computational Methods
Civil and Environmental Engineering
geogrid reinforced structure
wrapped facing
passive earth system facing
reinforced earth structure
mechanically stabilized earth wall
title Analysis of Geogrid Reinforced Structures with a Passive Facing System Using Different Computational Methods
title_full Analysis of Geogrid Reinforced Structures with a Passive Facing System Using Different Computational Methods
title_fullStr Analysis of Geogrid Reinforced Structures with a Passive Facing System Using Different Computational Methods
title_full_unstemmed Analysis of Geogrid Reinforced Structures with a Passive Facing System Using Different Computational Methods
title_short Analysis of Geogrid Reinforced Structures with a Passive Facing System Using Different Computational Methods
title_sort analysis of geogrid reinforced structures with a passive facing system using different computational methods
topic geogrid reinforced structure
wrapped facing
passive earth system facing
reinforced earth structure
mechanically stabilized earth wall
url https://doi.org/10.2478/cee-2021-0052
work_keys_str_mv AT sulovskamonika analysisofgeogridreinforcedstructureswithapassivefacingsystemusingdifferentcomputationalmethods
AT stachojakub analysisofgeogridreinforcedstructureswithapassivefacingsystemusingdifferentcomputationalmethods