PERIPROSTATIC NERVE BLOCK AND INTRAPROSTATIC INFILTRATION ON TRUS-P GUIDED BIOPSY

Objective: This study is aimed to determine the effectiveness and complications of periprostatic block and intraprostatic infiltration anesthesia for transrectal prostate biopsy. Material & Method: Two consecutive group of patients, periprostatic block (group A) and intraprostatic infiltration (...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Wendi Rachman, Ferry Safriadi
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: IKATAN AHLI UROLOGI INDONESIA 2013-07-01
Series:Jurnal Urologi Indonesia
Online Access:http://juri.urologi.or.id/juri/article/view/6
_version_ 1818286109391585280
author Wendi Rachman
Ferry Safriadi
author_facet Wendi Rachman
Ferry Safriadi
author_sort Wendi Rachman
collection DOAJ
description Objective: This study is aimed to determine the effectiveness and complications of periprostatic block and intraprostatic infiltration anesthesia for transrectal prostate biopsy. Material & Method: Two consecutive group of patients, periprostatic block (group A) and intraprostatic infiltration (group B), underwent transrectal ultrasound (TRUS) guided prostate biopsy were entered into the study. Exclusion criteria were severe systemic infection, local infection (prostatitis, proctitis, anorectal abscess, and fissure), hemorrhoid (external and/or internal), and chronic pelvic pain (bladder pain syndrome (BPS) or other pelvic disease. Each group enrolled 58 patients. The patients were requested to choose indicate degree of pain on visual analog score (VAS) 3 times, during probe insertion (VAS1), during anesthesia (VAS2), and during the biopsy (VAS3). Complications from the procedures were recorded. The data were analyzed using Mann-Whitney and independent t-test. Results: There were no significant difference in average age of groups, 65,69 ± 7,019 years for group A and 65,34 ± 7,633 years for group B (p = 0,647). The VAS3 score of group B 5,17 ± 0,653 was significantly lower than group A 5,9 ± 0,612 (p < 0,001). The change in VAS score (VAS3-VAS2) in group B 0,55 ± 0,535 also significantly lower than group A 1,00 ± 0,530 (p = 0,004). The average days with pain were not significant on both group, group A 1,16 ± 0,362 day and group B 1,12 ± 0,329 day (p = 0,594). The duration of bleeding was significantly higher on group B 1,32 ± 0,562 day than group A 1,10 ± 0,307 day (p = 0,026). Conclusion: Intraprostatic infiltration resulted in less pain during prostate biopsy, but also reported more bleeding after the procedure than the periprostatic block. Keywords: Intraprostatic infiltration, periprostatic nerve block, transrectal ultrasound guided prostate biopsy.
first_indexed 2024-12-13T01:19:22Z
format Article
id doaj.art-5135a3d9a55c465eadf559cf93059598
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 0853-442X
2355-1402
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-13T01:19:22Z
publishDate 2013-07-01
publisher IKATAN AHLI UROLOGI INDONESIA
record_format Article
series Jurnal Urologi Indonesia
spelling doaj.art-5135a3d9a55c465eadf559cf930595982022-12-22T00:04:16ZengIKATAN AHLI UROLOGI INDONESIAJurnal Urologi Indonesia0853-442X2355-14022013-07-0120210.32421/juri.v20i2.66PERIPROSTATIC NERVE BLOCK AND INTRAPROSTATIC INFILTRATION ON TRUS-P GUIDED BIOPSYWendi Rachman0Ferry Safriadi1Department of Urology, Faculty of Medicine/Padjadjaran University, Hasan Sadikin Hospital, Bandung, IndonesiaDepartment of Urology, Faculty of Medicine/Padjadjaran University, Hasan Sadikin Hospital, Bandung, IndonesiaObjective: This study is aimed to determine the effectiveness and complications of periprostatic block and intraprostatic infiltration anesthesia for transrectal prostate biopsy. Material & Method: Two consecutive group of patients, periprostatic block (group A) and intraprostatic infiltration (group B), underwent transrectal ultrasound (TRUS) guided prostate biopsy were entered into the study. Exclusion criteria were severe systemic infection, local infection (prostatitis, proctitis, anorectal abscess, and fissure), hemorrhoid (external and/or internal), and chronic pelvic pain (bladder pain syndrome (BPS) or other pelvic disease. Each group enrolled 58 patients. The patients were requested to choose indicate degree of pain on visual analog score (VAS) 3 times, during probe insertion (VAS1), during anesthesia (VAS2), and during the biopsy (VAS3). Complications from the procedures were recorded. The data were analyzed using Mann-Whitney and independent t-test. Results: There were no significant difference in average age of groups, 65,69 ± 7,019 years for group A and 65,34 ± 7,633 years for group B (p = 0,647). The VAS3 score of group B 5,17 ± 0,653 was significantly lower than group A 5,9 ± 0,612 (p < 0,001). The change in VAS score (VAS3-VAS2) in group B 0,55 ± 0,535 also significantly lower than group A 1,00 ± 0,530 (p = 0,004). The average days with pain were not significant on both group, group A 1,16 ± 0,362 day and group B 1,12 ± 0,329 day (p = 0,594). The duration of bleeding was significantly higher on group B 1,32 ± 0,562 day than group A 1,10 ± 0,307 day (p = 0,026). Conclusion: Intraprostatic infiltration resulted in less pain during prostate biopsy, but also reported more bleeding after the procedure than the periprostatic block. Keywords: Intraprostatic infiltration, periprostatic nerve block, transrectal ultrasound guided prostate biopsy.http://juri.urologi.or.id/juri/article/view/6
spellingShingle Wendi Rachman
Ferry Safriadi
PERIPROSTATIC NERVE BLOCK AND INTRAPROSTATIC INFILTRATION ON TRUS-P GUIDED BIOPSY
Jurnal Urologi Indonesia
title PERIPROSTATIC NERVE BLOCK AND INTRAPROSTATIC INFILTRATION ON TRUS-P GUIDED BIOPSY
title_full PERIPROSTATIC NERVE BLOCK AND INTRAPROSTATIC INFILTRATION ON TRUS-P GUIDED BIOPSY
title_fullStr PERIPROSTATIC NERVE BLOCK AND INTRAPROSTATIC INFILTRATION ON TRUS-P GUIDED BIOPSY
title_full_unstemmed PERIPROSTATIC NERVE BLOCK AND INTRAPROSTATIC INFILTRATION ON TRUS-P GUIDED BIOPSY
title_short PERIPROSTATIC NERVE BLOCK AND INTRAPROSTATIC INFILTRATION ON TRUS-P GUIDED BIOPSY
title_sort periprostatic nerve block and intraprostatic infiltration on trus p guided biopsy
url http://juri.urologi.or.id/juri/article/view/6
work_keys_str_mv AT wendirachman periprostaticnerveblockandintraprostaticinfiltrationontruspguidedbiopsy
AT ferrysafriadi periprostaticnerveblockandintraprostaticinfiltrationontruspguidedbiopsy