Proterozoic orogenic belts and rifting of Indian cratons: Geophysical constraints

The Aravalli–Delhi and Satpura Mobile Belts (ADMB and SMB) and the Eastern Ghat Mobile Belt (EGMB) in India form major Proterozoic mobile belts with adjoining cratons and contemporary basins. The most convincing features of the ADMB and the SMB have been the crustal layers dipping from both sides in...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: D.C. Mishra, M. Ravi Kumar
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Elsevier 2014-01-01
Series:Geoscience Frontiers
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1674987113000388
_version_ 1797709467468431360
author D.C. Mishra
M. Ravi Kumar
author_facet D.C. Mishra
M. Ravi Kumar
author_sort D.C. Mishra
collection DOAJ
description The Aravalli–Delhi and Satpura Mobile Belts (ADMB and SMB) and the Eastern Ghat Mobile Belt (EGMB) in India form major Proterozoic mobile belts with adjoining cratons and contemporary basins. The most convincing features of the ADMB and the SMB have been the crustal layers dipping from both sides in opposite directions, crustal thickening (∼45 km) and high density and high conductivity rocks in upper/lower crust associated with faults/thrusts. These observations indicate convergence while domal type reflectors in the lower crust suggest an extensional rifting phase. In case of the SMB, even the remnant of the subducting slab characterized by high conductive and low density slab in lithospheric mantle up to ∼120 km across the Purna–Godavari river faults has been traced which may be caused by fluids due to metamorphism. Subduction related intrusives of the SMB south of it and the ADMB west of it suggest N–S and E–W directed convergence and subduction during Meso–Neoproterozoic convergence. The simultaneous E–W convergence between the Bundelkhand craton and Marwar craton (Western Rajasthan) across the ADMB and the N–S convergence between the Bundelkhand craton and the Bhandara and Dharwar cratons across the SMB suggest that the forces of convergence might have been in a NE–SW direction with E–W and N–S components in the two cases, respectively. This explains the arcuate shaped collision zone of the ADMB and the SMB which are connected in their western part. The Eastern Ghat Mobile Belt (EGMB) also shows signatures of E–W directed Meso–Neoproterozoic convergence with East Antarctica similar to ADMB in north India. Foreland basins such as Vindhyan (ADMB–SMB), and Kurnool (EGMB) Supergroups of rocks were formed during this convergence. Older rocks such as Aravalli (ADMB), Mahakoshal–Bijawar (SMB), and Cuddapah (EGMB) Supergroups of rocks with several basic/ultrabasic intrusives along these mobile belts, plausibly formed during an earlier episode of rifting during Paleo–Mesoproterozoic period. They are highly disturbed and deformed due to subsequent Meso–Neoproterozoic convergence. As these Paleoproterozoic basins are characterized by large scale basic/ultrabasic intrusives that are considerably wide spread, it is suggested that a plume/superplume might have existed under the Indian cratons at that time which was responsible for the breakup of these cratons. Further, the presence of older intrusives in these mobile belts suggests that there might have been some form of convergence also during Paleoproterozoic period.
first_indexed 2024-03-12T06:38:03Z
format Article
id doaj.art-513c8f4932744a8ab9e258ffea287bc3
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1674-9871
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-12T06:38:03Z
publishDate 2014-01-01
publisher Elsevier
record_format Article
series Geoscience Frontiers
spelling doaj.art-513c8f4932744a8ab9e258ffea287bc32023-09-03T01:12:48ZengElsevierGeoscience Frontiers1674-98712014-01-0151254110.1016/j.gsf.2013.03.003Proterozoic orogenic belts and rifting of Indian cratons: Geophysical constraintsD.C. Mishra0M. Ravi Kumar1National Geophysical Research Institute (CSIR), Gravity Group, Hyderabad 500007, IndiaNational Geophysical Research Institute (CSIR), Gravity Group, Hyderabad 500007, IndiaThe Aravalli–Delhi and Satpura Mobile Belts (ADMB and SMB) and the Eastern Ghat Mobile Belt (EGMB) in India form major Proterozoic mobile belts with adjoining cratons and contemporary basins. The most convincing features of the ADMB and the SMB have been the crustal layers dipping from both sides in opposite directions, crustal thickening (∼45 km) and high density and high conductivity rocks in upper/lower crust associated with faults/thrusts. These observations indicate convergence while domal type reflectors in the lower crust suggest an extensional rifting phase. In case of the SMB, even the remnant of the subducting slab characterized by high conductive and low density slab in lithospheric mantle up to ∼120 km across the Purna–Godavari river faults has been traced which may be caused by fluids due to metamorphism. Subduction related intrusives of the SMB south of it and the ADMB west of it suggest N–S and E–W directed convergence and subduction during Meso–Neoproterozoic convergence. The simultaneous E–W convergence between the Bundelkhand craton and Marwar craton (Western Rajasthan) across the ADMB and the N–S convergence between the Bundelkhand craton and the Bhandara and Dharwar cratons across the SMB suggest that the forces of convergence might have been in a NE–SW direction with E–W and N–S components in the two cases, respectively. This explains the arcuate shaped collision zone of the ADMB and the SMB which are connected in their western part. The Eastern Ghat Mobile Belt (EGMB) also shows signatures of E–W directed Meso–Neoproterozoic convergence with East Antarctica similar to ADMB in north India. Foreland basins such as Vindhyan (ADMB–SMB), and Kurnool (EGMB) Supergroups of rocks were formed during this convergence. Older rocks such as Aravalli (ADMB), Mahakoshal–Bijawar (SMB), and Cuddapah (EGMB) Supergroups of rocks with several basic/ultrabasic intrusives along these mobile belts, plausibly formed during an earlier episode of rifting during Paleo–Mesoproterozoic period. They are highly disturbed and deformed due to subsequent Meso–Neoproterozoic convergence. As these Paleoproterozoic basins are characterized by large scale basic/ultrabasic intrusives that are considerably wide spread, it is suggested that a plume/superplume might have existed under the Indian cratons at that time which was responsible for the breakup of these cratons. Further, the presence of older intrusives in these mobile belts suggests that there might have been some form of convergence also during Paleoproterozoic period.http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1674987113000388Indian ShieldConvergenceCollisionRiftingGeophysical anomalies
spellingShingle D.C. Mishra
M. Ravi Kumar
Proterozoic orogenic belts and rifting of Indian cratons: Geophysical constraints
Geoscience Frontiers
Indian Shield
Convergence
Collision
Rifting
Geophysical anomalies
title Proterozoic orogenic belts and rifting of Indian cratons: Geophysical constraints
title_full Proterozoic orogenic belts and rifting of Indian cratons: Geophysical constraints
title_fullStr Proterozoic orogenic belts and rifting of Indian cratons: Geophysical constraints
title_full_unstemmed Proterozoic orogenic belts and rifting of Indian cratons: Geophysical constraints
title_short Proterozoic orogenic belts and rifting of Indian cratons: Geophysical constraints
title_sort proterozoic orogenic belts and rifting of indian cratons geophysical constraints
topic Indian Shield
Convergence
Collision
Rifting
Geophysical anomalies
url http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1674987113000388
work_keys_str_mv AT dcmishra proterozoicorogenicbeltsandriftingofindiancratonsgeophysicalconstraints
AT mravikumar proterozoicorogenicbeltsandriftingofindiancratonsgeophysicalconstraints