Assessment of Molecular Imaging of Angiogenesis with Three-Dimensional Ultrasonography

Molecular imaging (MI) with ultrasonography relies on microbubble contrast agents (MCAs) adhering to a ligand-specific target for applications such as characterizing tumor angiogenesis. It is projected that ultrasonic (US) MI can provide information about tumor therapeutic response before the detect...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Jason E. Streeter, Ryan C. Gessner, James Tsuruta, Steven Feingold, Paul A. Dayton
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: SAGE Publications 2011-11-01
Series:Molecular Imaging
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.2310/7290.2011.00015
_version_ 1797283656372322304
author Jason E. Streeter
Ryan C. Gessner
James Tsuruta
Steven Feingold
Paul A. Dayton
author_facet Jason E. Streeter
Ryan C. Gessner
James Tsuruta
Steven Feingold
Paul A. Dayton
author_sort Jason E. Streeter
collection DOAJ
description Molecular imaging (MI) with ultrasonography relies on microbubble contrast agents (MCAs) adhering to a ligand-specific target for applications such as characterizing tumor angiogenesis. It is projected that ultrasonic (US) MI can provide information about tumor therapeutic response before the detection of phenotypic changes. One of the limitations of preclinical US MI is that it lacks a comprehensive field of view. We attempted to improve targeted MCA visualization and quantification by performing three-dimensional (3D) MI of tumors expressing α v β 3 integrin. Volumetric acquisitions were obtained with a Siemens Sequoia system in cadence pulse sequencing mode by mechanically stepping the transducer elevationally across the tumor in 800-micron increments. MI was performed on rat fibrosarcoma tumors (n = 8) of similar sizes using MCAs conjugated with a cyclic RGD peptide targeted to α v β 3 integrin. US MI and immunohistochemical analyses show high microbubble targeting variability, suggesting that individual two-dimensional (2D) acquisitions risk misrepresenting more complex heterogeneous tissues. In 2D serial studies, where it may be challenging to image the same plane repeatedly, misalignments as small as 800 microns can introduce substantial error. 3D MI, including volumetric analysis of inter- and intra-animal targeting, provides a thorough way of characterizing angiogenesis and will be a more robust assessment technique for the future of MI.
first_indexed 2024-03-07T17:34:02Z
format Article
id doaj.art-5165ed1bfb9a46d58f8d8aecc11bf2df
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1536-0121
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-07T17:34:02Z
publishDate 2011-11-01
publisher SAGE Publications
record_format Article
series Molecular Imaging
spelling doaj.art-5165ed1bfb9a46d58f8d8aecc11bf2df2024-03-02T17:11:12ZengSAGE PublicationsMolecular Imaging1536-01212011-11-011010.2310/7290.2011.0001510.2310_7290.2011.00015Assessment of Molecular Imaging of Angiogenesis with Three-Dimensional UltrasonographyJason E. StreeterRyan C. GessnerJames TsurutaSteven FeingoldPaul A. DaytonMolecular imaging (MI) with ultrasonography relies on microbubble contrast agents (MCAs) adhering to a ligand-specific target for applications such as characterizing tumor angiogenesis. It is projected that ultrasonic (US) MI can provide information about tumor therapeutic response before the detection of phenotypic changes. One of the limitations of preclinical US MI is that it lacks a comprehensive field of view. We attempted to improve targeted MCA visualization and quantification by performing three-dimensional (3D) MI of tumors expressing α v β 3 integrin. Volumetric acquisitions were obtained with a Siemens Sequoia system in cadence pulse sequencing mode by mechanically stepping the transducer elevationally across the tumor in 800-micron increments. MI was performed on rat fibrosarcoma tumors (n = 8) of similar sizes using MCAs conjugated with a cyclic RGD peptide targeted to α v β 3 integrin. US MI and immunohistochemical analyses show high microbubble targeting variability, suggesting that individual two-dimensional (2D) acquisitions risk misrepresenting more complex heterogeneous tissues. In 2D serial studies, where it may be challenging to image the same plane repeatedly, misalignments as small as 800 microns can introduce substantial error. 3D MI, including volumetric analysis of inter- and intra-animal targeting, provides a thorough way of characterizing angiogenesis and will be a more robust assessment technique for the future of MI.https://doi.org/10.2310/7290.2011.00015
spellingShingle Jason E. Streeter
Ryan C. Gessner
James Tsuruta
Steven Feingold
Paul A. Dayton
Assessment of Molecular Imaging of Angiogenesis with Three-Dimensional Ultrasonography
Molecular Imaging
title Assessment of Molecular Imaging of Angiogenesis with Three-Dimensional Ultrasonography
title_full Assessment of Molecular Imaging of Angiogenesis with Three-Dimensional Ultrasonography
title_fullStr Assessment of Molecular Imaging of Angiogenesis with Three-Dimensional Ultrasonography
title_full_unstemmed Assessment of Molecular Imaging of Angiogenesis with Three-Dimensional Ultrasonography
title_short Assessment of Molecular Imaging of Angiogenesis with Three-Dimensional Ultrasonography
title_sort assessment of molecular imaging of angiogenesis with three dimensional ultrasonography
url https://doi.org/10.2310/7290.2011.00015
work_keys_str_mv AT jasonestreeter assessmentofmolecularimagingofangiogenesiswiththreedimensionalultrasonography
AT ryancgessner assessmentofmolecularimagingofangiogenesiswiththreedimensionalultrasonography
AT jamestsuruta assessmentofmolecularimagingofangiogenesiswiththreedimensionalultrasonography
AT stevenfeingold assessmentofmolecularimagingofangiogenesiswiththreedimensionalultrasonography
AT pauladayton assessmentofmolecularimagingofangiogenesiswiththreedimensionalultrasonography