ESOPHAGEAL MOTILITY IN MEN AND WOMEN EVALUATED BY HIGH-RESOLUTION MANOMETRY

ABSTRACT BACKGROUND Esophageal motility has been described in the literature as having differences between men and women. Most of these investigations use the water perfusion method for esophageal manometry. In this investigation the esophageal motility of men and women was compared with high-resol...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Tarciana Vieira COSTA, Roberto Oliveira DANTAS
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Instituto Brasileiro de Estudos e Pesquisas de Gastroenterologia (IBEPEGE) 2017-02-01
Series:Arquivos de Gastroenterologia
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0004-28032017000200145&lng=en&tlng=en
_version_ 1819052973935820800
author Tarciana Vieira COSTA
Roberto Oliveira DANTAS
author_facet Tarciana Vieira COSTA
Roberto Oliveira DANTAS
author_sort Tarciana Vieira COSTA
collection DOAJ
description ABSTRACT BACKGROUND Esophageal motility has been described in the literature as having differences between men and women. Most of these investigations use the water perfusion method for esophageal manometry. In this investigation the esophageal motility of men and women was compared with high-resolution manometry of the esophagus. OBJECTIVE To compare the esophageal motility of men and women with the high-resolution manometry method for esophageal manometry, performed in the sitting position. The hypothesis was that men and women have differences in esophageal motility. METHODS High-resolution manometry was performed in normal volunteers, 10 men [mean age: 37.5 (8.1) years] and 12 women [mean age: 38.7 (7.5) years], in the sitting position and with 10 swallows of a 5 mL bolus of saline, with an interval of at least 30 seconds between consecutive swallows. We evaluated the integrated relaxation pressure of the lower esophageal sphincter, contraction front velocity, distal contraction integral, distal latency, proximal contraction extension, proximal contraction duration >30 mmHg, proximal contraction duration, proximal contraction integral and maximal upper esophageal sphincter pressure. RESULTS There was no significant difference between men and women in the variables measured. CONCLUSION There was no difference in esophageal motility of men and women evaluated by the high resolution manometry method, in the sitting position with swallows of a liquid bolus.
first_indexed 2024-12-21T12:28:21Z
format Article
id doaj.art-516741adb5d143c0a7f5471621672ad1
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1678-4219
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-21T12:28:21Z
publishDate 2017-02-01
publisher Instituto Brasileiro de Estudos e Pesquisas de Gastroenterologia (IBEPEGE)
record_format Article
series Arquivos de Gastroenterologia
spelling doaj.art-516741adb5d143c0a7f5471621672ad12022-12-21T19:04:06ZengInstituto Brasileiro de Estudos e Pesquisas de Gastroenterologia (IBEPEGE)Arquivos de Gastroenterologia1678-42192017-02-0154214514710.1590/s0004-2803.201700000-10S0004-28032017000200145ESOPHAGEAL MOTILITY IN MEN AND WOMEN EVALUATED BY HIGH-RESOLUTION MANOMETRYTarciana Vieira COSTARoberto Oliveira DANTASABSTRACT BACKGROUND Esophageal motility has been described in the literature as having differences between men and women. Most of these investigations use the water perfusion method for esophageal manometry. In this investigation the esophageal motility of men and women was compared with high-resolution manometry of the esophagus. OBJECTIVE To compare the esophageal motility of men and women with the high-resolution manometry method for esophageal manometry, performed in the sitting position. The hypothesis was that men and women have differences in esophageal motility. METHODS High-resolution manometry was performed in normal volunteers, 10 men [mean age: 37.5 (8.1) years] and 12 women [mean age: 38.7 (7.5) years], in the sitting position and with 10 swallows of a 5 mL bolus of saline, with an interval of at least 30 seconds between consecutive swallows. We evaluated the integrated relaxation pressure of the lower esophageal sphincter, contraction front velocity, distal contraction integral, distal latency, proximal contraction extension, proximal contraction duration >30 mmHg, proximal contraction duration, proximal contraction integral and maximal upper esophageal sphincter pressure. RESULTS There was no significant difference between men and women in the variables measured. CONCLUSION There was no difference in esophageal motility of men and women evaluated by the high resolution manometry method, in the sitting position with swallows of a liquid bolus.http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0004-28032017000200145&lng=en&tlng=enMotilidade gastrointestinalManometria, métodosFatores sexuais
spellingShingle Tarciana Vieira COSTA
Roberto Oliveira DANTAS
ESOPHAGEAL MOTILITY IN MEN AND WOMEN EVALUATED BY HIGH-RESOLUTION MANOMETRY
Arquivos de Gastroenterologia
Motilidade gastrointestinal
Manometria, métodos
Fatores sexuais
title ESOPHAGEAL MOTILITY IN MEN AND WOMEN EVALUATED BY HIGH-RESOLUTION MANOMETRY
title_full ESOPHAGEAL MOTILITY IN MEN AND WOMEN EVALUATED BY HIGH-RESOLUTION MANOMETRY
title_fullStr ESOPHAGEAL MOTILITY IN MEN AND WOMEN EVALUATED BY HIGH-RESOLUTION MANOMETRY
title_full_unstemmed ESOPHAGEAL MOTILITY IN MEN AND WOMEN EVALUATED BY HIGH-RESOLUTION MANOMETRY
title_short ESOPHAGEAL MOTILITY IN MEN AND WOMEN EVALUATED BY HIGH-RESOLUTION MANOMETRY
title_sort esophageal motility in men and women evaluated by high resolution manometry
topic Motilidade gastrointestinal
Manometria, métodos
Fatores sexuais
url http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0004-28032017000200145&lng=en&tlng=en
work_keys_str_mv AT tarcianavieiracosta esophagealmotilityinmenandwomenevaluatedbyhighresolutionmanometry
AT robertooliveiradantas esophagealmotilityinmenandwomenevaluatedbyhighresolutionmanometry