Use of guidelines, checklists, frameworks, and recommendations in behavioral intervention preliminary studies and associations with reporting comprehensiveness: a scoping bibliometric review
Abstract Background Guidelines, checklists, frameworks, and recommendations (GCFRs) related to preliminary studies serve as essential resources to assist behavioral intervention researchers in reporting findings from preliminary studies, but their impact on preliminary study reporting comprehensiven...
Main Authors: | Christopher D. Pfledderer, Lauren von Klinggraeff, Sarah Burkart, Alexsandra da Silva Bandeira, Bridget Armstrong, R. Glenn Weaver, Elizabeth L. Adams, Michael W. Beets |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
BMC
2023-09-01
|
Series: | Pilot and Feasibility Studies |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://doi.org/10.1186/s40814-023-01389-w |
Similar Items
-
Fund behavioral science like the frameworks we endorse: the case for increased funding of preliminary studies by the National Institutes of Health
by: Michael W. Beets, et al.
Published: (2022-09-01) -
Small studies, big decisions: the role of pilot/feasibility studies in incremental science and premature scale-up of behavioral interventions
by: Michael W. Beets, et al.
Published: (2021-09-01) -
Feasibility indicators in obesity-related behavioral intervention preliminary studies: a historical scoping review
by: Christopher D. Pfledderer, et al.
Published: (2023-03-01) -
The mysterious case of the disappearing pilot study: a review of publication bias in preliminary behavioral interventions presented at health behavior conferences
by: Lauren von Klinggraeff, et al.
Published: (2023-07-01) -
Influence of pilot and small trials in meta-analyses of behavioral interventions: a meta-epidemiological study
by: Michael W. Beets, et al.
Published: (2023-02-01)