Beliefs in being unlucky and deficits in executive functioning: an ERP study

There has been initial evidence to support the Dysexecutive Luck hypothesis, which proposes that beliefs in being unlucky are associated with deficits in executive functioning (Maltby et al., 2013). The present study tested the Dysexecutive Luck hypothesis by examining whether deficits in the early...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Jaime Martín del Campo Ríos, Giorgio Fuggetta, John Maltby
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: PeerJ Inc. 2015-06-01
Series:PeerJ
Subjects:
Online Access:https://peerj.com/articles/1007.pdf
_version_ 1797424587724554240
author Jaime Martín del Campo Ríos
Giorgio Fuggetta
John Maltby
author_facet Jaime Martín del Campo Ríos
Giorgio Fuggetta
John Maltby
author_sort Jaime Martín del Campo Ríos
collection DOAJ
description There has been initial evidence to support the Dysexecutive Luck hypothesis, which proposes that beliefs in being unlucky are associated with deficits in executive functioning (Maltby et al., 2013). The present study tested the Dysexecutive Luck hypothesis by examining whether deficits in the early stage of top down attentional control led to an increase of neural activity in later stages of response related selection process among those who thought themselves to be unlucky. Individuals with these beliefs were compared to a control group using an Event-Related Potential (ERP) measure assessing underlying neural activity of semantic inhibition while completing a Stroop test. Results showed stronger main interference effects in the former group, via greater reaction times and a more negative distributed scalp late ERP component during incongruent trials in the time window of 450–780 ms post stimulus onset. Further, less efficient maintenance of task set among the former group was associated with greater late ERP response-related activation to compensate for the lack of top-down attentional control. These findings provide electrophysiological evidence to support the Dysexecutive Luck hypothesis.
first_indexed 2024-03-09T08:04:21Z
format Article
id doaj.art-5198c7b589ea43569391badc68fec77d
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2167-8359
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-09T08:04:21Z
publishDate 2015-06-01
publisher PeerJ Inc.
record_format Article
series PeerJ
spelling doaj.art-5198c7b589ea43569391badc68fec77d2023-12-03T00:25:47ZengPeerJ Inc.PeerJ2167-83592015-06-013e100710.7717/peerj.10071007Beliefs in being unlucky and deficits in executive functioning: an ERP studyJaime Martín del Campo Ríos0Giorgio Fuggetta1John Maltby2College of Medicine, Biological Sciences and Psychology, University of Leicester, Leicester, United KingdomCollege of Medicine, Biological Sciences and Psychology, University of Leicester, Leicester, United KingdomCollege of Medicine, Biological Sciences and Psychology, University of Leicester, Leicester, United KingdomThere has been initial evidence to support the Dysexecutive Luck hypothesis, which proposes that beliefs in being unlucky are associated with deficits in executive functioning (Maltby et al., 2013). The present study tested the Dysexecutive Luck hypothesis by examining whether deficits in the early stage of top down attentional control led to an increase of neural activity in later stages of response related selection process among those who thought themselves to be unlucky. Individuals with these beliefs were compared to a control group using an Event-Related Potential (ERP) measure assessing underlying neural activity of semantic inhibition while completing a Stroop test. Results showed stronger main interference effects in the former group, via greater reaction times and a more negative distributed scalp late ERP component during incongruent trials in the time window of 450–780 ms post stimulus onset. Further, less efficient maintenance of task set among the former group was associated with greater late ERP response-related activation to compensate for the lack of top-down attentional control. These findings provide electrophysiological evidence to support the Dysexecutive Luck hypothesis.https://peerj.com/articles/1007.pdfDysexecutive Luck hypothesisExecutive functioningEvent-related potentials (ERP)Anterior cingulate cortex (ACC)StroopLuck
spellingShingle Jaime Martín del Campo Ríos
Giorgio Fuggetta
John Maltby
Beliefs in being unlucky and deficits in executive functioning: an ERP study
PeerJ
Dysexecutive Luck hypothesis
Executive functioning
Event-related potentials (ERP)
Anterior cingulate cortex (ACC)
Stroop
Luck
title Beliefs in being unlucky and deficits in executive functioning: an ERP study
title_full Beliefs in being unlucky and deficits in executive functioning: an ERP study
title_fullStr Beliefs in being unlucky and deficits in executive functioning: an ERP study
title_full_unstemmed Beliefs in being unlucky and deficits in executive functioning: an ERP study
title_short Beliefs in being unlucky and deficits in executive functioning: an ERP study
title_sort beliefs in being unlucky and deficits in executive functioning an erp study
topic Dysexecutive Luck hypothesis
Executive functioning
Event-related potentials (ERP)
Anterior cingulate cortex (ACC)
Stroop
Luck
url https://peerj.com/articles/1007.pdf
work_keys_str_mv AT jaimemartindelcamporios beliefsinbeingunluckyanddeficitsinexecutivefunctioninganerpstudy
AT giorgiofuggetta beliefsinbeingunluckyanddeficitsinexecutivefunctioninganerpstudy
AT johnmaltby beliefsinbeingunluckyanddeficitsinexecutivefunctioninganerpstudy