Simulation Study of Different OPM-MEG Measurement Components

Magnetoencephalography (MEG) is a neuroimaging technique that measures the magnetic fields of the brain outside of the head. In the past, the most suitable magnetometer for MEG was the superconducting quantum interference device (SQUID), but in recent years, a new type has also been used, the optica...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Urban Marhl, Tilmann Sander, Vojko Jazbinšek
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2022-04-01
Series:Sensors
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/1424-8220/22/9/3184
_version_ 1797502909192077312
author Urban Marhl
Tilmann Sander
Vojko Jazbinšek
author_facet Urban Marhl
Tilmann Sander
Vojko Jazbinšek
author_sort Urban Marhl
collection DOAJ
description Magnetoencephalography (MEG) is a neuroimaging technique that measures the magnetic fields of the brain outside of the head. In the past, the most suitable magnetometer for MEG was the superconducting quantum interference device (SQUID), but in recent years, a new type has also been used, the optically pumped magnetometer (OPM). OPMs can be configured to measure multiple directions of magnetic field simultaneously. This work explored whether combining multiple directions of the magnetic field lowers the source localization error of brain sources under various conditions of noise. We simulated dipolar-like sources for multiple configurations of both SQUID- and OPM-MEG systems. To test the performance of a given layout, we calculated the average signal-to-noise ratio and the root mean square of the simulated magnetic field; furthermore, we evaluated the performance of the dipole fit. The results showed that the field direction normal to the scalp yields a higher signal-to-noise ratio and that ambient noise has a much lower impact on its localization error; therefore, this is the optimal choice for source localization when only one direction of magnetic field can be measured. For a low number of OPMs, combining multiple field directions greatly improves the source localization results. Lastly, we showed that MEG sensors that can be placed closer to the brain are more suitable for localizing deeper sources.
first_indexed 2024-03-10T03:42:53Z
format Article
id doaj.art-519dbaae1d0f4e4d98e085e7d9e6265d
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1424-8220
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-10T03:42:53Z
publishDate 2022-04-01
publisher MDPI AG
record_format Article
series Sensors
spelling doaj.art-519dbaae1d0f4e4d98e085e7d9e6265d2023-11-23T09:14:39ZengMDPI AGSensors1424-82202022-04-01229318410.3390/s22093184Simulation Study of Different OPM-MEG Measurement ComponentsUrban Marhl0Tilmann Sander1Vojko Jazbinšek2Faculty of Natural Sciences and Mathematics, University of Maribor, Koroška cesta 160, 2000 Maribor, SloveniaPhysikalisch-Technische Bundesanstalt, Abbestraße 2, 10587 Berlin, GermanyDepartment of Physics, Institute of Mathematics, Physics and Mechanics, Jadranska ulica 19, 1000 Ljubljana, SloveniaMagnetoencephalography (MEG) is a neuroimaging technique that measures the magnetic fields of the brain outside of the head. In the past, the most suitable magnetometer for MEG was the superconducting quantum interference device (SQUID), but in recent years, a new type has also been used, the optically pumped magnetometer (OPM). OPMs can be configured to measure multiple directions of magnetic field simultaneously. This work explored whether combining multiple directions of the magnetic field lowers the source localization error of brain sources under various conditions of noise. We simulated dipolar-like sources for multiple configurations of both SQUID- and OPM-MEG systems. To test the performance of a given layout, we calculated the average signal-to-noise ratio and the root mean square of the simulated magnetic field; furthermore, we evaluated the performance of the dipole fit. The results showed that the field direction normal to the scalp yields a higher signal-to-noise ratio and that ambient noise has a much lower impact on its localization error; therefore, this is the optimal choice for source localization when only one direction of magnetic field can be measured. For a low number of OPMs, combining multiple field directions greatly improves the source localization results. Lastly, we showed that MEG sensors that can be placed closer to the brain are more suitable for localizing deeper sources.https://www.mdpi.com/1424-8220/22/9/3184magnetoencephalographyoptically pumped magnetometerssuperconducting quantum interference devicevolume conductorboundary element methodequivalent current dipole
spellingShingle Urban Marhl
Tilmann Sander
Vojko Jazbinšek
Simulation Study of Different OPM-MEG Measurement Components
Sensors
magnetoencephalography
optically pumped magnetometers
superconducting quantum interference device
volume conductor
boundary element method
equivalent current dipole
title Simulation Study of Different OPM-MEG Measurement Components
title_full Simulation Study of Different OPM-MEG Measurement Components
title_fullStr Simulation Study of Different OPM-MEG Measurement Components
title_full_unstemmed Simulation Study of Different OPM-MEG Measurement Components
title_short Simulation Study of Different OPM-MEG Measurement Components
title_sort simulation study of different opm meg measurement components
topic magnetoencephalography
optically pumped magnetometers
superconducting quantum interference device
volume conductor
boundary element method
equivalent current dipole
url https://www.mdpi.com/1424-8220/22/9/3184
work_keys_str_mv AT urbanmarhl simulationstudyofdifferentopmmegmeasurementcomponents
AT tilmannsander simulationstudyofdifferentopmmegmeasurementcomponents
AT vojkojazbinsek simulationstudyofdifferentopmmegmeasurementcomponents