Division Of Labor Between Grammar And Pragmatics Concerning Anaphora

This paper addresses the problem of the distribution and interpretation of the Korean long-distance anaphor caki and its pronominal counterpart ku. The first part of this paper reviews previous analyses and shows that the distribution of caki and ku cannot be fully accounted for in purely structural...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Kim, Sun-Hee
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: University of Kansas 1992-01-01
Series:Kansas Working Papers in Linguistics
Subjects:
Online Access:http://hdl.handle.net/1808/641
_version_ 1811262913367769088
author Kim, Sun-Hee
author_facet Kim, Sun-Hee
author_sort Kim, Sun-Hee
collection DOAJ
description This paper addresses the problem of the distribution and interpretation of the Korean long-distance anaphor caki and its pronominal counterpart ku. The first part of this paper reviews previous analyses and shows that the distribution of caki and ku cannot be fully accounted for in purely structural terms. I will then provide an alternative analysis within the neo-Gricean theory of implicature (Grice 1975, Horn 1984, Levinson 1991). Finally, I will discuss some cases where caki and ku appear to be in free variation and argue that the account provided here can be generalized to cover those cases as well.
first_indexed 2024-04-12T19:34:04Z
format Article
id doaj.art-51a1e390311d457badc91fa71bbb454b
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2378-7600
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-12T19:34:04Z
publishDate 1992-01-01
publisher University of Kansas
record_format Article
series Kansas Working Papers in Linguistics
spelling doaj.art-51a1e390311d457badc91fa71bbb454b2022-12-22T03:19:15ZengUniversity of KansasKansas Working Papers in Linguistics2378-76001992-01-0117324310.17161/KWPL.1808.641Division Of Labor Between Grammar And Pragmatics Concerning AnaphoraKim, Sun-HeeThis paper addresses the problem of the distribution and interpretation of the Korean long-distance anaphor caki and its pronominal counterpart ku. The first part of this paper reviews previous analyses and shows that the distribution of caki and ku cannot be fully accounted for in purely structural terms. I will then provide an alternative analysis within the neo-Gricean theory of implicature (Grice 1975, Horn 1984, Levinson 1991). Finally, I will discuss some cases where caki and ku appear to be in free variation and argue that the account provided here can be generalized to cover those cases as well.http://hdl.handle.net/1808/641Anaphora (Linguistics)Pragmatics
spellingShingle Kim, Sun-Hee
Division Of Labor Between Grammar And Pragmatics Concerning Anaphora
Kansas Working Papers in Linguistics
Anaphora (Linguistics)
Pragmatics
title Division Of Labor Between Grammar And Pragmatics Concerning Anaphora
title_full Division Of Labor Between Grammar And Pragmatics Concerning Anaphora
title_fullStr Division Of Labor Between Grammar And Pragmatics Concerning Anaphora
title_full_unstemmed Division Of Labor Between Grammar And Pragmatics Concerning Anaphora
title_short Division Of Labor Between Grammar And Pragmatics Concerning Anaphora
title_sort division of labor between grammar and pragmatics concerning anaphora
topic Anaphora (Linguistics)
Pragmatics
url http://hdl.handle.net/1808/641
work_keys_str_mv AT kimsunhee divisionoflaborbetweengrammarandpragmaticsconcerninganaphora