Inadequacy of fluvial energetics for describing gravity current autosuspension

Abstract Gravity currents, such as sediment-laden turbidity currents, are ubiquitous natural flows that are driven by a density difference. Turbidity currents have provided vital motivation to advance understanding of this class of flows because their enigmatic long run-out and driving mechanisms ar...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Sojiro Fukuda, Marijke G. W. de Vet, Edward W. G. Skevington, Elena Bastianon, Roberto Fernández, Xuxu Wu, William D. McCaffrey, Hajime Naruse, Daniel R. Parsons, Robert M. Dorrell
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Nature Portfolio 2023-04-01
Series:Nature Communications
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-023-37724-1
_version_ 1797840921491931136
author Sojiro Fukuda
Marijke G. W. de Vet
Edward W. G. Skevington
Elena Bastianon
Roberto Fernández
Xuxu Wu
William D. McCaffrey
Hajime Naruse
Daniel R. Parsons
Robert M. Dorrell
author_facet Sojiro Fukuda
Marijke G. W. de Vet
Edward W. G. Skevington
Elena Bastianon
Roberto Fernández
Xuxu Wu
William D. McCaffrey
Hajime Naruse
Daniel R. Parsons
Robert M. Dorrell
author_sort Sojiro Fukuda
collection DOAJ
description Abstract Gravity currents, such as sediment-laden turbidity currents, are ubiquitous natural flows that are driven by a density difference. Turbidity currents have provided vital motivation to advance understanding of this class of flows because their enigmatic long run-out and driving mechanisms are not properly understood. Extant models assume that material transport by gravity currents is dynamically similar to fluvial flows. Here, empirical research from different types of particle-driven gravity currents is integrated with our experimental data, to show that material transport is fundamentally different from fluvial systems. Contrary to current theory, buoyancy production is shown to have a non-linear dependence on available flow power, indicating an underestimation of the total kinetic energy lost from the mean flow. A revised energy budget directly implies that the mixing efficiency of gravity currents is enhanced.
first_indexed 2024-04-09T16:22:44Z
format Article
id doaj.art-51a5d64aae3b4ff8b8e77a938279ca02
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2041-1723
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-09T16:22:44Z
publishDate 2023-04-01
publisher Nature Portfolio
record_format Article
series Nature Communications
spelling doaj.art-51a5d64aae3b4ff8b8e77a938279ca022023-04-23T11:21:56ZengNature PortfolioNature Communications2041-17232023-04-0114111010.1038/s41467-023-37724-1Inadequacy of fluvial energetics for describing gravity current autosuspensionSojiro Fukuda0Marijke G. W. de Vet1Edward W. G. Skevington2Elena Bastianon3Roberto Fernández4Xuxu Wu5William D. McCaffrey6Hajime Naruse7Daniel R. Parsons8Robert M. Dorrell9Energy and Environment Institute, University of HullEnergy and Environment Institute, University of HullEnergy and Environment Institute, University of HullEnergy and Environment Institute, University of HullEnergy and Environment Institute, University of HullEnergy and Environment Institute, University of HullSchool of Earth and Environment, University of LeedsDepartment of Geology and Mineralogy, Division of Earth and Planetary Sciences, Graduate School of Science, Kyoto UniversityEnergy and Environment Institute, University of HullEnergy and Environment Institute, University of HullAbstract Gravity currents, such as sediment-laden turbidity currents, are ubiquitous natural flows that are driven by a density difference. Turbidity currents have provided vital motivation to advance understanding of this class of flows because their enigmatic long run-out and driving mechanisms are not properly understood. Extant models assume that material transport by gravity currents is dynamically similar to fluvial flows. Here, empirical research from different types of particle-driven gravity currents is integrated with our experimental data, to show that material transport is fundamentally different from fluvial systems. Contrary to current theory, buoyancy production is shown to have a non-linear dependence on available flow power, indicating an underestimation of the total kinetic energy lost from the mean flow. A revised energy budget directly implies that the mixing efficiency of gravity currents is enhanced.https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-023-37724-1
spellingShingle Sojiro Fukuda
Marijke G. W. de Vet
Edward W. G. Skevington
Elena Bastianon
Roberto Fernández
Xuxu Wu
William D. McCaffrey
Hajime Naruse
Daniel R. Parsons
Robert M. Dorrell
Inadequacy of fluvial energetics for describing gravity current autosuspension
Nature Communications
title Inadequacy of fluvial energetics for describing gravity current autosuspension
title_full Inadequacy of fluvial energetics for describing gravity current autosuspension
title_fullStr Inadequacy of fluvial energetics for describing gravity current autosuspension
title_full_unstemmed Inadequacy of fluvial energetics for describing gravity current autosuspension
title_short Inadequacy of fluvial energetics for describing gravity current autosuspension
title_sort inadequacy of fluvial energetics for describing gravity current autosuspension
url https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-023-37724-1
work_keys_str_mv AT sojirofukuda inadequacyoffluvialenergeticsfordescribinggravitycurrentautosuspension
AT marijkegwdevet inadequacyoffluvialenergeticsfordescribinggravitycurrentautosuspension
AT edwardwgskevington inadequacyoffluvialenergeticsfordescribinggravitycurrentautosuspension
AT elenabastianon inadequacyoffluvialenergeticsfordescribinggravitycurrentautosuspension
AT robertofernandez inadequacyoffluvialenergeticsfordescribinggravitycurrentautosuspension
AT xuxuwu inadequacyoffluvialenergeticsfordescribinggravitycurrentautosuspension
AT williamdmccaffrey inadequacyoffluvialenergeticsfordescribinggravitycurrentautosuspension
AT hajimenaruse inadequacyoffluvialenergeticsfordescribinggravitycurrentautosuspension
AT danielrparsons inadequacyoffluvialenergeticsfordescribinggravitycurrentautosuspension
AT robertmdorrell inadequacyoffluvialenergeticsfordescribinggravitycurrentautosuspension