Human brucellosis in Baringo County, Kenya: Evaluating the diagnostic kits used and identifying infecting Brucella species

Human brucellosis diagnosis has been a challenge in Brucella-endemic areas. In Kenya, diagnosis is usually carried out using Febrile Brucella Antigen agglutination test (FBAT) whose performance is not well documented. This paper reports on the sensitivity and specificity of the FBAT used for brucell...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Nelly M. A. Waringa, Lilian W. Waiboci, Lilly Bebora, Peter W. Kinyanjui, Philemon Kosgei, Stella Kiambi, Eric Osoro
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Public Library of Science (PLoS) 2023-01-01
Series:PLoS ONE
Online Access:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9888686/?tool=EBI
_version_ 1811173530972192768
author Nelly M. A. Waringa
Lilian W. Waiboci
Lilly Bebora
Peter W. Kinyanjui
Philemon Kosgei
Stella Kiambi
Eric Osoro
author_facet Nelly M. A. Waringa
Lilian W. Waiboci
Lilly Bebora
Peter W. Kinyanjui
Philemon Kosgei
Stella Kiambi
Eric Osoro
author_sort Nelly M. A. Waringa
collection DOAJ
description Human brucellosis diagnosis has been a challenge in Brucella-endemic areas. In Kenya, diagnosis is usually carried out using Febrile Brucella Antigen agglutination test (FBAT) whose performance is not well documented. This paper reports on the sensitivity and specificity of the FBAT used for brucellosis diagnosis on blood samples/serum collected in three healthcare facilities in Baringo County, Kenya, and on Brucella species present in the study area. The FBAT test results at the hospitals were used to guide patient management. Patients who visited the hospital’s laboratory with a clinician’s request for brucellosis testing also filled a questionnaire to assess knowledge and attitudes associated with transmission of the disease in the study area. The remaining serum samples were tested again using FBAT and Rose Bengal Plate Test (RBPT) within a month of blood collection at the University Nairobi Laboratory. The two rapid tests were then compared, with respect to brucellosis diagnostic sensitivity and specificity. To identify infecting Brucella species, a proportion 43% (71/166) of the blood clots were analyzed by multiplex polymerase chain reaction (PCR) using specific primers for B. abortus, B. melitensis, B. ovis and B. suis. Out of 166 serum samples tested, 26.5% (44/166) were positive using FBAT and 10.2% (17/166) positive using RBPT. The sensitivity and specificity of FBAT compared to RBPT was 76.47% and 71.19%, respectively while the positive and negative predictive values were 29.55% and 96.72%, respectively. The FBAT showed higher positivity then RBPT. The difference in sensitivity and specificity of FBAT and RBPTs was relatively low. The high FBAT positivity rate would be indication of misdiagnosis; this would lead to incorrect treatment. Brucella abortus was detected from 9.9% (7/71) of the blood clots tested; no other Brucella species were detected. Thus human brucellosis, in Baringo was mainly caused by B. abortus.
first_indexed 2024-04-10T17:48:31Z
format Article
id doaj.art-51ae8386cbbe4d3a8442854b69e1e16c
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1932-6203
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-10T17:48:31Z
publishDate 2023-01-01
publisher Public Library of Science (PLoS)
record_format Article
series PLoS ONE
spelling doaj.art-51ae8386cbbe4d3a8442854b69e1e16c2023-02-02T22:58:20ZengPublic Library of Science (PLoS)PLoS ONE1932-62032023-01-01181Human brucellosis in Baringo County, Kenya: Evaluating the diagnostic kits used and identifying infecting Brucella speciesNelly M. A. WaringaLilian W. WaibociLilly BeboraPeter W. KinyanjuiPhilemon KosgeiStella KiambiEric OsoroHuman brucellosis diagnosis has been a challenge in Brucella-endemic areas. In Kenya, diagnosis is usually carried out using Febrile Brucella Antigen agglutination test (FBAT) whose performance is not well documented. This paper reports on the sensitivity and specificity of the FBAT used for brucellosis diagnosis on blood samples/serum collected in three healthcare facilities in Baringo County, Kenya, and on Brucella species present in the study area. The FBAT test results at the hospitals were used to guide patient management. Patients who visited the hospital’s laboratory with a clinician’s request for brucellosis testing also filled a questionnaire to assess knowledge and attitudes associated with transmission of the disease in the study area. The remaining serum samples were tested again using FBAT and Rose Bengal Plate Test (RBPT) within a month of blood collection at the University Nairobi Laboratory. The two rapid tests were then compared, with respect to brucellosis diagnostic sensitivity and specificity. To identify infecting Brucella species, a proportion 43% (71/166) of the blood clots were analyzed by multiplex polymerase chain reaction (PCR) using specific primers for B. abortus, B. melitensis, B. ovis and B. suis. Out of 166 serum samples tested, 26.5% (44/166) were positive using FBAT and 10.2% (17/166) positive using RBPT. The sensitivity and specificity of FBAT compared to RBPT was 76.47% and 71.19%, respectively while the positive and negative predictive values were 29.55% and 96.72%, respectively. The FBAT showed higher positivity then RBPT. The difference in sensitivity and specificity of FBAT and RBPTs was relatively low. The high FBAT positivity rate would be indication of misdiagnosis; this would lead to incorrect treatment. Brucella abortus was detected from 9.9% (7/71) of the blood clots tested; no other Brucella species were detected. Thus human brucellosis, in Baringo was mainly caused by B. abortus.https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9888686/?tool=EBI
spellingShingle Nelly M. A. Waringa
Lilian W. Waiboci
Lilly Bebora
Peter W. Kinyanjui
Philemon Kosgei
Stella Kiambi
Eric Osoro
Human brucellosis in Baringo County, Kenya: Evaluating the diagnostic kits used and identifying infecting Brucella species
PLoS ONE
title Human brucellosis in Baringo County, Kenya: Evaluating the diagnostic kits used and identifying infecting Brucella species
title_full Human brucellosis in Baringo County, Kenya: Evaluating the diagnostic kits used and identifying infecting Brucella species
title_fullStr Human brucellosis in Baringo County, Kenya: Evaluating the diagnostic kits used and identifying infecting Brucella species
title_full_unstemmed Human brucellosis in Baringo County, Kenya: Evaluating the diagnostic kits used and identifying infecting Brucella species
title_short Human brucellosis in Baringo County, Kenya: Evaluating the diagnostic kits used and identifying infecting Brucella species
title_sort human brucellosis in baringo county kenya evaluating the diagnostic kits used and identifying infecting brucella species
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9888686/?tool=EBI
work_keys_str_mv AT nellymawaringa humanbrucellosisinbaringocountykenyaevaluatingthediagnostickitsusedandidentifyinginfectingbrucellaspecies
AT lilianwwaiboci humanbrucellosisinbaringocountykenyaevaluatingthediagnostickitsusedandidentifyinginfectingbrucellaspecies
AT lillybebora humanbrucellosisinbaringocountykenyaevaluatingthediagnostickitsusedandidentifyinginfectingbrucellaspecies
AT peterwkinyanjui humanbrucellosisinbaringocountykenyaevaluatingthediagnostickitsusedandidentifyinginfectingbrucellaspecies
AT philemonkosgei humanbrucellosisinbaringocountykenyaevaluatingthediagnostickitsusedandidentifyinginfectingbrucellaspecies
AT stellakiambi humanbrucellosisinbaringocountykenyaevaluatingthediagnostickitsusedandidentifyinginfectingbrucellaspecies
AT ericosoro humanbrucellosisinbaringocountykenyaevaluatingthediagnostickitsusedandidentifyinginfectingbrucellaspecies