HARVESTING SURAL FLAP WITH COVERED PEDICLE

ABSTRACT Objectives: The aim was to evaluate the viability and the outcomes of the sural flap performed with the pedicle covered by a strip of skin. Methods: A prospective cohort of 20 consecutive cases were evaluated in terms of flap viability, complication rate, and the amount of skin graft requ...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Álvaro Baik Cho, Carlos Henrique Vieira Ferreira, Priscilla Goes Medea de Mendonça, Luiz Sorrenti, Leandro Yoshinobu Kiyohara
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Sociedade Brasileira de Ortopedia e Traumatologia 2023-04-01
Series:Acta Ortopédica Brasileira
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1413-78522023000200203&lng=en&tlng=en
_version_ 1797844860691021824
author Álvaro Baik Cho
Carlos Henrique Vieira Ferreira
Priscilla Goes Medea de Mendonça
Luiz Sorrenti
Leandro Yoshinobu Kiyohara
author_facet Álvaro Baik Cho
Carlos Henrique Vieira Ferreira
Priscilla Goes Medea de Mendonça
Luiz Sorrenti
Leandro Yoshinobu Kiyohara
author_sort Álvaro Baik Cho
collection DOAJ
description ABSTRACT Objectives: The aim was to evaluate the viability and the outcomes of the sural flap performed with the pedicle covered by a strip of skin. Methods: A prospective cohort of 20 consecutive cases were evaluated in terms of flap viability, complication rate, and the amount of skin graft required. The location of the defects was the middle third of the tibia in 3 cases, the ankle and hindfoot in 15 cases, the middle foot in 1 case, and the forefoot in 1 case. The flap design was the same as described by Masquelet. The only modification included a strip of skin over the entire length of the pedicle. The intermediary skin between the donor site and the defect was incised and the skin was undermined to accommodate the pedicle without compression. Results: All cases had a satisfactory evolution, with adequate healing and without flap loss. Both the donor site and the pedicle were primarily closed in all cases. In one patient, the flap developed a limited area of superficial epidermolysis that healed spontaneously. Conclusion: the modified sural flap with a covered pedicle is feasible and reliable with a lower rate of complications when compared with the conventional sural flap. Level of Evidence IV, Cohort Studies.
first_indexed 2024-04-09T17:29:12Z
format Article
id doaj.art-51afeeb44d844b4ab882ffac9d047e1a
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1413-7852
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-09T17:29:12Z
publishDate 2023-04-01
publisher Sociedade Brasileira de Ortopedia e Traumatologia
record_format Article
series Acta Ortopédica Brasileira
spelling doaj.art-51afeeb44d844b4ab882ffac9d047e1a2023-04-18T07:33:29ZengSociedade Brasileira de Ortopedia e TraumatologiaActa Ortopédica Brasileira1413-78522023-04-0131spe110.1590/1413-785220233101e257850HARVESTING SURAL FLAP WITH COVERED PEDICLEÁlvaro Baik Chohttps://orcid.org/0000-0002-3099-4750Carlos Henrique Vieira Ferreirahttps://orcid.org/0000-0001-8287-4649Priscilla Goes Medea de Mendonçahttps://orcid.org/0000-0002-1493-7051Luiz Sorrentihttps://orcid.org/0000-0003-1160-8559Leandro Yoshinobu Kiyoharahttps://orcid.org/0000-0003-3768-2597ABSTRACT Objectives: The aim was to evaluate the viability and the outcomes of the sural flap performed with the pedicle covered by a strip of skin. Methods: A prospective cohort of 20 consecutive cases were evaluated in terms of flap viability, complication rate, and the amount of skin graft required. The location of the defects was the middle third of the tibia in 3 cases, the ankle and hindfoot in 15 cases, the middle foot in 1 case, and the forefoot in 1 case. The flap design was the same as described by Masquelet. The only modification included a strip of skin over the entire length of the pedicle. The intermediary skin between the donor site and the defect was incised and the skin was undermined to accommodate the pedicle without compression. Results: All cases had a satisfactory evolution, with adequate healing and without flap loss. Both the donor site and the pedicle were primarily closed in all cases. In one patient, the flap developed a limited area of superficial epidermolysis that healed spontaneously. Conclusion: the modified sural flap with a covered pedicle is feasible and reliable with a lower rate of complications when compared with the conventional sural flap. Level of Evidence IV, Cohort Studies.http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1413-78522023000200203&lng=en&tlng=enTissue TransplantationSurgical FlapsFree Tissue Flaps
spellingShingle Álvaro Baik Cho
Carlos Henrique Vieira Ferreira
Priscilla Goes Medea de Mendonça
Luiz Sorrenti
Leandro Yoshinobu Kiyohara
HARVESTING SURAL FLAP WITH COVERED PEDICLE
Acta Ortopédica Brasileira
Tissue Transplantation
Surgical Flaps
Free Tissue Flaps
title HARVESTING SURAL FLAP WITH COVERED PEDICLE
title_full HARVESTING SURAL FLAP WITH COVERED PEDICLE
title_fullStr HARVESTING SURAL FLAP WITH COVERED PEDICLE
title_full_unstemmed HARVESTING SURAL FLAP WITH COVERED PEDICLE
title_short HARVESTING SURAL FLAP WITH COVERED PEDICLE
title_sort harvesting sural flap with covered pedicle
topic Tissue Transplantation
Surgical Flaps
Free Tissue Flaps
url http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1413-78522023000200203&lng=en&tlng=en
work_keys_str_mv AT alvarobaikcho harvestingsuralflapwithcoveredpedicle
AT carloshenriquevieiraferreira harvestingsuralflapwithcoveredpedicle
AT priscillagoesmedeademendonca harvestingsuralflapwithcoveredpedicle
AT luizsorrenti harvestingsuralflapwithcoveredpedicle
AT leandroyoshinobukiyohara harvestingsuralflapwithcoveredpedicle