Ecomorphology of a predatory deep-sea fish family: does trophic specialization drive hyperspeciation?

Two of the main drivers of speciation among aquatic vertebrates are physical isolation (e.g., lakes and streams) and micro-niche availability (e.g., tropical reefs). In both regards, the mesopelagic domain of the open ocean, Earth’s second largest cumulative ecosystem (behind only the bathypelagic d...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Ryan P. McGonagle, David W. Kerstetter, Danté Fenolio, Tracey T. Sutton
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Frontiers Media S.A. 2023-05-01
Series:Frontiers in Marine Science
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fmars.2023.1056094/full
_version_ 1797824030254825472
author Ryan P. McGonagle
David W. Kerstetter
Danté Fenolio
Tracey T. Sutton
author_facet Ryan P. McGonagle
David W. Kerstetter
Danté Fenolio
Tracey T. Sutton
author_sort Ryan P. McGonagle
collection DOAJ
description Two of the main drivers of speciation among aquatic vertebrates are physical isolation (e.g., lakes and streams) and micro-niche availability (e.g., tropical reefs). In both regards, the mesopelagic domain of the open ocean, Earth’s second largest cumulative ecosystem (behind only the bathypelagic domain), would seem retardant. Ocean circulation makes isolation rare on both contemporary and geological time/space scales, and the lack of substrate precludes stable micro-niches. Paradoxically, some pelagic taxa demonstrate much higher-than-expected species richness on regional scales. A prime example is the dragonfish family Stomiidae, the most speciose family of mesopelagic fishes, owing largely to the subfamily Melanostomiinae (scaleless black dragonfishes), which contributes 222 of the 320 described species. Within genera, species are differentiated almost solely by form of the jugular-positioned, bioluminescent barbel, a structure putatively linked to feeding (via prey luring). The relationship between diversity (both systematic and morphological) and diet within the Melanostomiinae has not been previously examined, primarily due to sample size limitation. Herein, the diet and morphology of 16 species of melanostomiine dragonfishes from the Gulf of Mexico were examined to ascertain whether the diversification in this fish clade is based on prey specialization, as is the case with many other speciose fish families (e.g., Cichlidae). Gut content analysis revealed a rather small spectrum of prey taxa across a wide spectrum of predators, with most species exhibiting piscivory centered on the most regionally abundant lanternfishes (Myctophidae). Lesser numbers of species preyed upon bristlemouths (Gonostomatidae), oceanic basslets (Howellidae), bigscales (Melamphaidae), and other dragonfishes, while three species selected for cephalopod prey. No dragonfish species consumed macrocrustaceans (e.g., decapod shrimps), despite their numerical prevalence as potential prey. Regarding functional morphology, dissimilarity was driven mostly by barbel length, vertical oral gape, and horizontal maxillary oral gape. There were no robust morphological-dietary relationships amongst melanostomiines, with dietary diversity much lower than morphological diversity. These results suggest that other factors, perhaps conspecific recognition and/or sexual selection related to spawning, may be primary drivers of hyperspeciation in the micro-habitat-poor pelagic environment.
first_indexed 2024-03-13T10:32:56Z
format Article
id doaj.art-51b23ffc2b5345d4a7d63bd6343bb1a6
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2296-7745
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-13T10:32:56Z
publishDate 2023-05-01
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format Article
series Frontiers in Marine Science
spelling doaj.art-51b23ffc2b5345d4a7d63bd6343bb1a62023-05-18T09:43:51ZengFrontiers Media S.A.Frontiers in Marine Science2296-77452023-05-011010.3389/fmars.2023.10560941056094Ecomorphology of a predatory deep-sea fish family: does trophic specialization drive hyperspeciation?Ryan P. McGonagle0David W. Kerstetter1Danté Fenolio2Tracey T. Sutton3Department of Marine and Environmental Sciences, Halmos College of Arts and Sciences and Guy Harvey Oceanographic Research Center, Nova Southeastern University, Dania Beach, FL, United StatesDepartment of Marine and Environmental Sciences, Halmos College of Arts and Sciences and Guy Harvey Oceanographic Research Center, Nova Southeastern University, Dania Beach, FL, United StatesCenter for Conservation & Research, San Antonio Zoo, San Antonio, TX, United StatesDepartment of Marine and Environmental Sciences, Halmos College of Arts and Sciences and Guy Harvey Oceanographic Research Center, Nova Southeastern University, Dania Beach, FL, United StatesTwo of the main drivers of speciation among aquatic vertebrates are physical isolation (e.g., lakes and streams) and micro-niche availability (e.g., tropical reefs). In both regards, the mesopelagic domain of the open ocean, Earth’s second largest cumulative ecosystem (behind only the bathypelagic domain), would seem retardant. Ocean circulation makes isolation rare on both contemporary and geological time/space scales, and the lack of substrate precludes stable micro-niches. Paradoxically, some pelagic taxa demonstrate much higher-than-expected species richness on regional scales. A prime example is the dragonfish family Stomiidae, the most speciose family of mesopelagic fishes, owing largely to the subfamily Melanostomiinae (scaleless black dragonfishes), which contributes 222 of the 320 described species. Within genera, species are differentiated almost solely by form of the jugular-positioned, bioluminescent barbel, a structure putatively linked to feeding (via prey luring). The relationship between diversity (both systematic and morphological) and diet within the Melanostomiinae has not been previously examined, primarily due to sample size limitation. Herein, the diet and morphology of 16 species of melanostomiine dragonfishes from the Gulf of Mexico were examined to ascertain whether the diversification in this fish clade is based on prey specialization, as is the case with many other speciose fish families (e.g., Cichlidae). Gut content analysis revealed a rather small spectrum of prey taxa across a wide spectrum of predators, with most species exhibiting piscivory centered on the most regionally abundant lanternfishes (Myctophidae). Lesser numbers of species preyed upon bristlemouths (Gonostomatidae), oceanic basslets (Howellidae), bigscales (Melamphaidae), and other dragonfishes, while three species selected for cephalopod prey. No dragonfish species consumed macrocrustaceans (e.g., decapod shrimps), despite their numerical prevalence as potential prey. Regarding functional morphology, dissimilarity was driven mostly by barbel length, vertical oral gape, and horizontal maxillary oral gape. There were no robust morphological-dietary relationships amongst melanostomiines, with dietary diversity much lower than morphological diversity. These results suggest that other factors, perhaps conspecific recognition and/or sexual selection related to spawning, may be primary drivers of hyperspeciation in the micro-habitat-poor pelagic environment.https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fmars.2023.1056094/fullStomiidaeMelanostomiinaetrophic ecologyecomorphologymorphological-dietary relationshipsmesopelagic
spellingShingle Ryan P. McGonagle
David W. Kerstetter
Danté Fenolio
Tracey T. Sutton
Ecomorphology of a predatory deep-sea fish family: does trophic specialization drive hyperspeciation?
Frontiers in Marine Science
Stomiidae
Melanostomiinae
trophic ecology
ecomorphology
morphological-dietary relationships
mesopelagic
title Ecomorphology of a predatory deep-sea fish family: does trophic specialization drive hyperspeciation?
title_full Ecomorphology of a predatory deep-sea fish family: does trophic specialization drive hyperspeciation?
title_fullStr Ecomorphology of a predatory deep-sea fish family: does trophic specialization drive hyperspeciation?
title_full_unstemmed Ecomorphology of a predatory deep-sea fish family: does trophic specialization drive hyperspeciation?
title_short Ecomorphology of a predatory deep-sea fish family: does trophic specialization drive hyperspeciation?
title_sort ecomorphology of a predatory deep sea fish family does trophic specialization drive hyperspeciation
topic Stomiidae
Melanostomiinae
trophic ecology
ecomorphology
morphological-dietary relationships
mesopelagic
url https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fmars.2023.1056094/full
work_keys_str_mv AT ryanpmcgonagle ecomorphologyofapredatorydeepseafishfamilydoestrophicspecializationdrivehyperspeciation
AT davidwkerstetter ecomorphologyofapredatorydeepseafishfamilydoestrophicspecializationdrivehyperspeciation
AT dantefenolio ecomorphologyofapredatorydeepseafishfamilydoestrophicspecializationdrivehyperspeciation
AT traceytsutton ecomorphologyofapredatorydeepseafishfamilydoestrophicspecializationdrivehyperspeciation