Is the Weissean <i>Surrogate</i> the Latest Philosophical “Development” of the Confucian <i>Ritual</i>?

What is meant by <i>ritual</i> (<i>li</i>) in the Confucian tradition—mostly Xunzi—might be said to be the root of three different concepts-“stages” or concept-“developments” in European philosophy. The first stage is the concept of <i>habit</i>, from the Aristote...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Marina Christodoulou
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2022-03-01
Series:Proceedings
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/2504-3900/81/1/13
Description
Summary:What is meant by <i>ritual</i> (<i>li</i>) in the Confucian tradition—mostly Xunzi—might be said to be the root of three different concepts-“stages” or concept-“developments” in European philosophy. The first stage is the concept of <i>habit</i>, from the Aristotelian “hexis” to Bourdieu’s “habitus”. The second is the <i>sign</i>, as developed by the American Pragmatists and, in Europe, by Saussure. There is a third, relatively recent stage, as I would classify it, which is Paul Weiss’ <i>surrogate</i>. Weiss uses the pragmatist theorization of habit to construct his original concept of the surrogates. The above stages might be chronological in the way they appear (<i>habit</i>, <i>sign</i>, <i>surrogate</i>), but one does not erase the other. They have the same root—which I would like to argue is the <i>ritual</i>—and they build on it, while each differentiates ritual in its own way. They are distinctive concepts but, at the same time, are related to one another.
ISSN:2504-3900