Questionnaire-based computational screening of adult ADHD
Abstract Background ADHD is classically seen as a childhood disease, although it persists in one out of two cases in adults. The diagnosis is based on a long and multidisciplinary process, involving different health professionals, leading to an under-diagnosis of adult ADHD individuals. We therefore...
Main Authors: | , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
BMC
2022-06-01
|
Series: | BMC Psychiatry |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://doi.org/10.1186/s12888-022-04048-1 |
_version_ | 1818228286247927808 |
---|---|
author | Arthur Trognon Manon Richard |
author_facet | Arthur Trognon Manon Richard |
author_sort | Arthur Trognon |
collection | DOAJ |
description | Abstract Background ADHD is classically seen as a childhood disease, although it persists in one out of two cases in adults. The diagnosis is based on a long and multidisciplinary process, involving different health professionals, leading to an under-diagnosis of adult ADHD individuals. We therefore present a psychometric screening scale for the identification of adult ADHD which could be used both in clinical and experimental settings. Method We designed the scale from the DSM-5 and administered it to n = 110 control individuals and n = 110 ADHD individuals. The number of items was reduced using multiple regression procedures. We then performed factorial analyses and a machine learning assessment of the predictive power of the scale in comparison with other clinical scales measuring common ADHD comorbidities. Results Internal consistency coefficients were calculated satisfactorily for TRAQ10, with Cronbach’s alpha measured at .9. The 2-factor model tested was confirmed, a high correlation between the items and their belonging factor. Finally, a machine-learning analysis showed that classification algorithms could identify subjects’ group membership with high accuracy, statistically superior to the performances obtained using comorbidity scales. Conclusions The scale showed sufficient performance for its use in clinical and experimental settings for hypothesis testing or screening purpose, although its generalizability is limited by the age and gender biases present in the data analyzed. |
first_indexed | 2024-12-12T10:00:17Z |
format | Article |
id | doaj.art-51b5318462694bc283356123b03c2ac2 |
institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
issn | 1471-244X |
language | English |
last_indexed | 2024-12-12T10:00:17Z |
publishDate | 2022-06-01 |
publisher | BMC |
record_format | Article |
series | BMC Psychiatry |
spelling | doaj.art-51b5318462694bc283356123b03c2ac22022-12-22T00:28:01ZengBMCBMC Psychiatry1471-244X2022-06-012211810.1186/s12888-022-04048-1Questionnaire-based computational screening of adult ADHDArthur Trognon0Manon Richard1ClinicogClinicogAbstract Background ADHD is classically seen as a childhood disease, although it persists in one out of two cases in adults. The diagnosis is based on a long and multidisciplinary process, involving different health professionals, leading to an under-diagnosis of adult ADHD individuals. We therefore present a psychometric screening scale for the identification of adult ADHD which could be used both in clinical and experimental settings. Method We designed the scale from the DSM-5 and administered it to n = 110 control individuals and n = 110 ADHD individuals. The number of items was reduced using multiple regression procedures. We then performed factorial analyses and a machine learning assessment of the predictive power of the scale in comparison with other clinical scales measuring common ADHD comorbidities. Results Internal consistency coefficients were calculated satisfactorily for TRAQ10, with Cronbach’s alpha measured at .9. The 2-factor model tested was confirmed, a high correlation between the items and their belonging factor. Finally, a machine-learning analysis showed that classification algorithms could identify subjects’ group membership with high accuracy, statistically superior to the performances obtained using comorbidity scales. Conclusions The scale showed sufficient performance for its use in clinical and experimental settings for hypothesis testing or screening purpose, although its generalizability is limited by the age and gender biases present in the data analyzed.https://doi.org/10.1186/s12888-022-04048-1ADHDDiagnosisMachine-learningClinical scalePsychometrics - adult |
spellingShingle | Arthur Trognon Manon Richard Questionnaire-based computational screening of adult ADHD BMC Psychiatry ADHD Diagnosis Machine-learning Clinical scale Psychometrics - adult |
title | Questionnaire-based computational screening of adult ADHD |
title_full | Questionnaire-based computational screening of adult ADHD |
title_fullStr | Questionnaire-based computational screening of adult ADHD |
title_full_unstemmed | Questionnaire-based computational screening of adult ADHD |
title_short | Questionnaire-based computational screening of adult ADHD |
title_sort | questionnaire based computational screening of adult adhd |
topic | ADHD Diagnosis Machine-learning Clinical scale Psychometrics - adult |
url | https://doi.org/10.1186/s12888-022-04048-1 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT arthurtrognon questionnairebasedcomputationalscreeningofadultadhd AT manonrichard questionnairebasedcomputationalscreeningofadultadhd |