Presentimiento de la ciudad fronteriza (sobre la Politeia de Platón)
This essay tries to think with Plato (not against nor from him) the idea of justice, which structures the city and the human soul in the Republic, and the platonic self-critique displayed in several late dialogues, viewed as a basis for a philosophy that can make sense of human existence in the bord...
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | Spanish |
Published: |
Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México (UNAM)
2003-10-01
|
Series: | Theoría Revista del Colegio de Filosofía |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://revistas.filos.unam.mx/index.php/theoria/article/view/300 |
_version_ | 1797723398418202624 |
---|---|
author | Eugenio Trías |
author_facet | Eugenio Trías |
author_sort | Eugenio Trías |
collection | DOAJ |
description | This essay tries to think with Plato (not against nor from him) the idea of justice, which structures the city and the human soul in the Republic, and the platonic self-critique displayed in several late dialogues, viewed as a basis for a philosophy that can make sense of human existence in the bordering city. The bordering city –itself a metaphor of Limit–, inhabited by intermediary characters (love and creation, reminiscence and reason, halfway between the Ideal city and the cave), is what makes possible the interchange between transcendent Being (the Good, Beauty, Truth) and Becoming (which characterizes human existence). The bordering city is Plato’s greatest discovery, through which we can think an alternative city and the corresponding human condition, and even the world (cosmos). Plato gave the necessary clues to come to this alternative conception, and his recourse to myth can be seen as a symbolic addition that allows access to truth. What is, what exists and happens, is an unceasing return of “archetypes” (ideas joined with symbols). This gives consistency to what is, what exists and what we ourselves are. Philosophical truth is the awareness of the fact that we live within these archetypes, relatively to which we determine and decide our existence. Still, Plato’s thought, as a philosophy of limit, remains distant from the sensible and changing individual, which can be recreated by Limit and the being of Limit. In fact, what is recreated in Limit is a being (perceptible by the senses, singular, and in change): a being of limit which, through ideas and symbols can become accessible to understanding. |
first_indexed | 2024-03-12T10:02:16Z |
format | Article |
id | doaj.art-51bff720f0424617b8359d7a1940a5c4 |
institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
issn | 1665-6415 |
language | Spanish |
last_indexed | 2024-03-12T10:02:16Z |
publishDate | 2003-10-01 |
publisher | Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México (UNAM) |
record_format | Article |
series | Theoría Revista del Colegio de Filosofía |
spelling | doaj.art-51bff720f0424617b8359d7a1940a5c42023-09-02T11:32:44ZspaUniversidad Nacional Autónoma de México (UNAM)Theoría Revista del Colegio de Filosofía1665-64152003-10-0114-1510.22201/ffyl.16656415p.2003.14-15.300Presentimiento de la ciudad fronteriza (sobre la Politeia de Platón)Eugenio Trías0Universidad Pompeu FabraThis essay tries to think with Plato (not against nor from him) the idea of justice, which structures the city and the human soul in the Republic, and the platonic self-critique displayed in several late dialogues, viewed as a basis for a philosophy that can make sense of human existence in the bordering city. The bordering city –itself a metaphor of Limit–, inhabited by intermediary characters (love and creation, reminiscence and reason, halfway between the Ideal city and the cave), is what makes possible the interchange between transcendent Being (the Good, Beauty, Truth) and Becoming (which characterizes human existence). The bordering city is Plato’s greatest discovery, through which we can think an alternative city and the corresponding human condition, and even the world (cosmos). Plato gave the necessary clues to come to this alternative conception, and his recourse to myth can be seen as a symbolic addition that allows access to truth. What is, what exists and happens, is an unceasing return of “archetypes” (ideas joined with symbols). This gives consistency to what is, what exists and what we ourselves are. Philosophical truth is the awareness of the fact that we live within these archetypes, relatively to which we determine and decide our existence. Still, Plato’s thought, as a philosophy of limit, remains distant from the sensible and changing individual, which can be recreated by Limit and the being of Limit. In fact, what is recreated in Limit is a being (perceptible by the senses, singular, and in change): a being of limit which, through ideas and symbols can become accessible to understanding.http://revistas.filos.unam.mx/index.php/theoria/article/view/300Esencia de la justiciaEl diálogoEl arteEl ser singularDiálogoArte |
spellingShingle | Eugenio Trías Presentimiento de la ciudad fronteriza (sobre la Politeia de Platón) Theoría Revista del Colegio de Filosofía Esencia de la justicia El diálogo El arte El ser singular Diálogo Arte |
title | Presentimiento de la ciudad fronteriza (sobre la Politeia de Platón) |
title_full | Presentimiento de la ciudad fronteriza (sobre la Politeia de Platón) |
title_fullStr | Presentimiento de la ciudad fronteriza (sobre la Politeia de Platón) |
title_full_unstemmed | Presentimiento de la ciudad fronteriza (sobre la Politeia de Platón) |
title_short | Presentimiento de la ciudad fronteriza (sobre la Politeia de Platón) |
title_sort | presentimiento de la ciudad fronteriza sobre la politeia de platon |
topic | Esencia de la justicia El diálogo El arte El ser singular Diálogo Arte |
url | http://revistas.filos.unam.mx/index.php/theoria/article/view/300 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT eugeniotrias presentimientodelaciudadfronterizasobrelapoliteiadeplaton |