Clinical practice guidelines for the antenatal management of dichorionic diamniotic twin pregnancies: a systematic review

Abstract Objective This review aimed to identify guidelines with recommendations applicable to the antenatal management of dichorionic diamniotic twin pregnancies within high-income countries, appraise their methodological quality, and discuss the similarities and variability across guidelines. Meth...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Caroline O’Connor, Emily O’Connor, Sara Leitao, Shauna Barrett, Keelin O’Donoghue
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMC 2023-05-01
Series:BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1186/s12884-023-05652-z
_version_ 1797827291409022976
author Caroline O’Connor
Emily O’Connor
Sara Leitao
Shauna Barrett
Keelin O’Donoghue
author_facet Caroline O’Connor
Emily O’Connor
Sara Leitao
Shauna Barrett
Keelin O’Donoghue
author_sort Caroline O’Connor
collection DOAJ
description Abstract Objective This review aimed to identify guidelines with recommendations applicable to the antenatal management of dichorionic diamniotic twin pregnancies within high-income countries, appraise their methodological quality, and discuss the similarities and variability across guidelines. Method A systematic literature review of electronic databases was performed. Manual searches of guideline repositories and websites of professional organisations were performed to identify additional guidelines. The protocol for this systematic review was registered on PROSPERO (CRD42021248586, 25 June 2021). AGREE II and AGREE-REX tools were applied to assess the quality of eligible guidelines. A narrative and thematic synthesis described and compared the guidelines and their recommendations. Results Twenty-four guidelines were included, from which 483 recommendations were identified across 4 international organisations and 12 countries. Guidelines addressed eight themes and recommendations were classified accordingly: chorionicity and dating (103 recommendations), fetal growth (105 recommendations), termination of pregnancy (12 recommendations), fetal death (13 recommendations), fetal anomalies (65 recommendations), antenatal care (65 recommendations), preterm labour (56 recommendations) and birth (54 recommendations). Guidelines showed significant variability in recommendations, with conflicting recommendations regarding non-invasive preterm testing, definitions surrounding selective fetal growth restriction, screening for preterm labour and the timing of birth. Guidelines lacked a focus on standard antenatal management of DCDA twins, management of discordant fetal anomaly and single fetal demise. Conclusions Specific guidance for dichorionic diamniotic twins is overall indistinct and access to guidance regarding the antenatal management of these pregnancies is currently difficult. Management of discordant fetal anomaly or single fetal demise needs greater consideration.
first_indexed 2024-04-09T12:46:06Z
format Article
id doaj.art-51cfaf10e4314045b1f2a9351e506323
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1471-2393
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-09T12:46:06Z
publishDate 2023-05-01
publisher BMC
record_format Article
series BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth
spelling doaj.art-51cfaf10e4314045b1f2a9351e5063232023-05-14T11:31:03ZengBMCBMC Pregnancy and Childbirth1471-23932023-05-0123112310.1186/s12884-023-05652-zClinical practice guidelines for the antenatal management of dichorionic diamniotic twin pregnancies: a systematic reviewCaroline O’Connor0Emily O’Connor1Sara Leitao2Shauna Barrett3Keelin O’Donoghue4INFANT Research Centre, University College CorkINFANT Research Centre, University College CorkPregnancy Loss Research Group, Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology, University College CorkCork University Hospital Library, Cork University HospitalINFANT Research Centre, University College CorkAbstract Objective This review aimed to identify guidelines with recommendations applicable to the antenatal management of dichorionic diamniotic twin pregnancies within high-income countries, appraise their methodological quality, and discuss the similarities and variability across guidelines. Method A systematic literature review of electronic databases was performed. Manual searches of guideline repositories and websites of professional organisations were performed to identify additional guidelines. The protocol for this systematic review was registered on PROSPERO (CRD42021248586, 25 June 2021). AGREE II and AGREE-REX tools were applied to assess the quality of eligible guidelines. A narrative and thematic synthesis described and compared the guidelines and their recommendations. Results Twenty-four guidelines were included, from which 483 recommendations were identified across 4 international organisations and 12 countries. Guidelines addressed eight themes and recommendations were classified accordingly: chorionicity and dating (103 recommendations), fetal growth (105 recommendations), termination of pregnancy (12 recommendations), fetal death (13 recommendations), fetal anomalies (65 recommendations), antenatal care (65 recommendations), preterm labour (56 recommendations) and birth (54 recommendations). Guidelines showed significant variability in recommendations, with conflicting recommendations regarding non-invasive preterm testing, definitions surrounding selective fetal growth restriction, screening for preterm labour and the timing of birth. Guidelines lacked a focus on standard antenatal management of DCDA twins, management of discordant fetal anomaly and single fetal demise. Conclusions Specific guidance for dichorionic diamniotic twins is overall indistinct and access to guidance regarding the antenatal management of these pregnancies is currently difficult. Management of discordant fetal anomaly or single fetal demise needs greater consideration.https://doi.org/10.1186/s12884-023-05652-zDichorionic diamnioticTwin pregnancyClinical practice guidelinesAntenatal management
spellingShingle Caroline O’Connor
Emily O’Connor
Sara Leitao
Shauna Barrett
Keelin O’Donoghue
Clinical practice guidelines for the antenatal management of dichorionic diamniotic twin pregnancies: a systematic review
BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth
Dichorionic diamniotic
Twin pregnancy
Clinical practice guidelines
Antenatal management
title Clinical practice guidelines for the antenatal management of dichorionic diamniotic twin pregnancies: a systematic review
title_full Clinical practice guidelines for the antenatal management of dichorionic diamniotic twin pregnancies: a systematic review
title_fullStr Clinical practice guidelines for the antenatal management of dichorionic diamniotic twin pregnancies: a systematic review
title_full_unstemmed Clinical practice guidelines for the antenatal management of dichorionic diamniotic twin pregnancies: a systematic review
title_short Clinical practice guidelines for the antenatal management of dichorionic diamniotic twin pregnancies: a systematic review
title_sort clinical practice guidelines for the antenatal management of dichorionic diamniotic twin pregnancies a systematic review
topic Dichorionic diamniotic
Twin pregnancy
Clinical practice guidelines
Antenatal management
url https://doi.org/10.1186/s12884-023-05652-z
work_keys_str_mv AT carolineoconnor clinicalpracticeguidelinesfortheantenatalmanagementofdichorionicdiamniotictwinpregnanciesasystematicreview
AT emilyoconnor clinicalpracticeguidelinesfortheantenatalmanagementofdichorionicdiamniotictwinpregnanciesasystematicreview
AT saraleitao clinicalpracticeguidelinesfortheantenatalmanagementofdichorionicdiamniotictwinpregnanciesasystematicreview
AT shaunabarrett clinicalpracticeguidelinesfortheantenatalmanagementofdichorionicdiamniotictwinpregnanciesasystematicreview
AT keelinodonoghue clinicalpracticeguidelinesfortheantenatalmanagementofdichorionicdiamniotictwinpregnanciesasystematicreview