Can We Stratify Quality and Cost for Older Patients With Proximal and Midshaft Humerus Fractures?
Introduction: This study sought to investigate whether a validated trauma triage tool can stratify hospital quality measures and inpatient cost for middle-aged and geriatric trauma patients with isolated proximal and midshaft humerus fractures. Materials and Methods: Patients aged 55 and older who s...
Main Authors: | , , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
SAGE Publishing
2021-02-01
|
Series: | Geriatric Orthopaedic Surgery & Rehabilitation |
Online Access: | https://doi.org/10.1177/2151459321992742 |
_version_ | 1818434018515877888 |
---|---|
author | Sanjit R. Konda MD Joseph R. Johnson ScB Nicket Dedhia BA Erin A. Kelly MS Kenneth A. Egol MD |
author_facet | Sanjit R. Konda MD Joseph R. Johnson ScB Nicket Dedhia BA Erin A. Kelly MS Kenneth A. Egol MD |
author_sort | Sanjit R. Konda MD |
collection | DOAJ |
description | Introduction: This study sought to investigate whether a validated trauma triage tool can stratify hospital quality measures and inpatient cost for middle-aged and geriatric trauma patients with isolated proximal and midshaft humerus fractures. Materials and Methods: Patients aged 55 and older who sustained a proximal or midshaft humerus fracture and required inpatient treatment were included. Patient demographic, comorbidity, and injury severity information was used to calculate each patient’s Score for Trauma Triage in the Geriatric and Middle-Aged (STTGMA). Based on scores, patients were stratified to create minimal, low, moderate, and high risk groups. Outcomes included length of stay, complications, operative management, ICU/SDU-level care, discharge disposition, unplanned readmission, and index admission costs. Results: Seventy-four patients with 74 humerus fractures met final inclusion criteria. Fifty-eight (78.4%) patients presented with proximal humerus and 16 (21.6%) with midshaft humerus fractures. Mean length of stay was 5.5 ± 3.4 days with a significant difference among risk groups (P = 0.029). Lower risk patients were more likely to undergo surgical management (P = 0.015) while higher risk patients required more ICU/SDU-level care (P < 0.001). Twenty-six (70.3%) minimal risk patients were discharged home compared to zero high risk patients (P = 0.001). Higher risk patients experienced higher total inpatient costs across operative and nonoperative treatment groups. Conclusion: The STTGMA tool is able to reliably predict hospital quality measures and cost outcomes that may allow hospitals and providers to improve value-based care and clinical decision-making for patients presenting with proximal and midshaft humerus fractures. Level of Evidence: Prognostic Level III. |
first_indexed | 2024-12-14T16:30:19Z |
format | Article |
id | doaj.art-51ddb1980a2c436097089e1c7d1f4662 |
institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
issn | 2151-4593 |
language | English |
last_indexed | 2024-12-14T16:30:19Z |
publishDate | 2021-02-01 |
publisher | SAGE Publishing |
record_format | Article |
series | Geriatric Orthopaedic Surgery & Rehabilitation |
spelling | doaj.art-51ddb1980a2c436097089e1c7d1f46622022-12-21T22:54:35ZengSAGE PublishingGeriatric Orthopaedic Surgery & Rehabilitation2151-45932021-02-011210.1177/2151459321992742Can We Stratify Quality and Cost for Older Patients With Proximal and Midshaft Humerus Fractures?Sanjit R. Konda MD0Joseph R. Johnson ScB1Nicket Dedhia BA2Erin A. Kelly MS3Kenneth A. Egol MD4 Jamaica Hospital Medical Center, Queens, NY, USA NYU Langone Orthopedic Hospital, NYU Langone Medical Center, New York, NY, USA NYU Langone Orthopedic Hospital, NYU Langone Medical Center, New York, NY, USA NYU Langone Orthopedic Hospital, NYU Langone Medical Center, New York, NY, USA Jamaica Hospital Medical Center, Queens, NY, USAIntroduction: This study sought to investigate whether a validated trauma triage tool can stratify hospital quality measures and inpatient cost for middle-aged and geriatric trauma patients with isolated proximal and midshaft humerus fractures. Materials and Methods: Patients aged 55 and older who sustained a proximal or midshaft humerus fracture and required inpatient treatment were included. Patient demographic, comorbidity, and injury severity information was used to calculate each patient’s Score for Trauma Triage in the Geriatric and Middle-Aged (STTGMA). Based on scores, patients were stratified to create minimal, low, moderate, and high risk groups. Outcomes included length of stay, complications, operative management, ICU/SDU-level care, discharge disposition, unplanned readmission, and index admission costs. Results: Seventy-four patients with 74 humerus fractures met final inclusion criteria. Fifty-eight (78.4%) patients presented with proximal humerus and 16 (21.6%) with midshaft humerus fractures. Mean length of stay was 5.5 ± 3.4 days with a significant difference among risk groups (P = 0.029). Lower risk patients were more likely to undergo surgical management (P = 0.015) while higher risk patients required more ICU/SDU-level care (P < 0.001). Twenty-six (70.3%) minimal risk patients were discharged home compared to zero high risk patients (P = 0.001). Higher risk patients experienced higher total inpatient costs across operative and nonoperative treatment groups. Conclusion: The STTGMA tool is able to reliably predict hospital quality measures and cost outcomes that may allow hospitals and providers to improve value-based care and clinical decision-making for patients presenting with proximal and midshaft humerus fractures. Level of Evidence: Prognostic Level III.https://doi.org/10.1177/2151459321992742 |
spellingShingle | Sanjit R. Konda MD Joseph R. Johnson ScB Nicket Dedhia BA Erin A. Kelly MS Kenneth A. Egol MD Can We Stratify Quality and Cost for Older Patients With Proximal and Midshaft Humerus Fractures? Geriatric Orthopaedic Surgery & Rehabilitation |
title | Can We Stratify Quality and Cost for Older Patients With Proximal and Midshaft Humerus Fractures? |
title_full | Can We Stratify Quality and Cost for Older Patients With Proximal and Midshaft Humerus Fractures? |
title_fullStr | Can We Stratify Quality and Cost for Older Patients With Proximal and Midshaft Humerus Fractures? |
title_full_unstemmed | Can We Stratify Quality and Cost for Older Patients With Proximal and Midshaft Humerus Fractures? |
title_short | Can We Stratify Quality and Cost for Older Patients With Proximal and Midshaft Humerus Fractures? |
title_sort | can we stratify quality and cost for older patients with proximal and midshaft humerus fractures |
url | https://doi.org/10.1177/2151459321992742 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT sanjitrkondamd canwestratifyqualityandcostforolderpatientswithproximalandmidshafthumerusfractures AT josephrjohnsonscb canwestratifyqualityandcostforolderpatientswithproximalandmidshafthumerusfractures AT nicketdedhiaba canwestratifyqualityandcostforolderpatientswithproximalandmidshafthumerusfractures AT erinakellyms canwestratifyqualityandcostforolderpatientswithproximalandmidshafthumerusfractures AT kennethaegolmd canwestratifyqualityandcostforolderpatientswithproximalandmidshafthumerusfractures |