Effectiveness of the T‐Control catheter: A study protocol

Abstract Background Foley catheters have been subject to limited development in the last few decades. They fulfil their basic function of draining urine from the bladder but cause other associated problems. T‐Control is a new silicone Foley catheter with an integrated fluid control valve whose desig...

全面介绍

书目详细资料
Main Authors: Yolanda Ramallo‐Fariña, Ana Toledo Chávarri, Adrián Amador Robayna, Max Mòdol Vidal, Cristina Valcárcel‐Nazco, Clara Armas Moreno, Lilisbeth Perestelo‐Pérez, Marta Serrano Muñoz, Manuel Luque González, Lidia García‐Pérez, Miguel Ángel García‐Bello, Pedro Serrano‐Aguilar, Pedro Raúl Castellano Santana, Laura Vera Álamo
格式: 文件
语言:English
出版: Wiley 2024-02-01
丛编:BJUI Compass
主题:
在线阅读:https://doi.org/10.1002/bco2.285
_version_ 1827345863009107968
author Yolanda Ramallo‐Fariña
Ana Toledo Chávarri
Adrián Amador Robayna
Max Mòdol Vidal
Cristina Valcárcel‐Nazco
Clara Armas Moreno
Lilisbeth Perestelo‐Pérez
Marta Serrano Muñoz
Manuel Luque González
Lidia García‐Pérez
Miguel Ángel García‐Bello
Pedro Serrano‐Aguilar
Pedro Raúl Castellano Santana
Laura Vera Álamo
author_facet Yolanda Ramallo‐Fariña
Ana Toledo Chávarri
Adrián Amador Robayna
Max Mòdol Vidal
Cristina Valcárcel‐Nazco
Clara Armas Moreno
Lilisbeth Perestelo‐Pérez
Marta Serrano Muñoz
Manuel Luque González
Lidia García‐Pérez
Miguel Ángel García‐Bello
Pedro Serrano‐Aguilar
Pedro Raúl Castellano Santana
Laura Vera Álamo
author_sort Yolanda Ramallo‐Fariña
collection DOAJ
description Abstract Background Foley catheters have been subject to limited development in the last few decades. They fulfil their basic function of draining urine from the bladder but cause other associated problems. T‐Control is a new silicone Foley catheter with an integrated fluid control valve whose design aims to reduce the risks associated with bladder catheterisation by a multifactorial approach. The general purpose of this study is to evaluate the effectiveness and cost‐effectiveness of the T‐Control catheter versus the Foley‐type catheter in patients with Acute Urine Retention (AUR). Study design This is a pragmatic, open, multicentre, controlled clinical trial with random allocation to the T‐Control catheter or a conventional Foley‐type catheter in patients with AUR. Endpoints The magnitude of infections will be analysed as a primary endpoint. While as secondary endpoint, the following will be analysed: rate of symptomatic and asymptomatic infections; days free of infection; quality of life‐related to self‐perceived health; indication of associated antibiotic treatments; determination of biofilm; number of catheter‐related adverse events; use of each type of catheterisation's healthcare resources; level of satisfaction and workload of health professionals and acceptability of the T‐Control device as well as the patient experience. Patients and methods Eligible patients are male adults aged ≥50 years, with AUR and with an indication of bladder catheterisation for at least 2 weeks. The estimated sample size is 50 patients. Patient follow‐up includes both the time of catheter insertion and its removal or change 2 weeks later, plus 2 weeks after this time when the patient will be called for an in‐depth interview.
first_indexed 2024-03-07T23:19:50Z
format Article
id doaj.art-51e7eb2035c84f98bb6d88928579c260
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2688-4526
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-07T23:19:50Z
publishDate 2024-02-01
publisher Wiley
record_format Article
series BJUI Compass
spelling doaj.art-51e7eb2035c84f98bb6d88928579c2602024-02-21T07:14:02ZengWileyBJUI Compass2688-45262024-02-015217818810.1002/bco2.285Effectiveness of the T‐Control catheter: A study protocolYolanda Ramallo‐Fariña0Ana Toledo Chávarri1Adrián Amador Robayna2Max Mòdol Vidal3Cristina Valcárcel‐Nazco4Clara Armas Moreno5Lilisbeth Perestelo‐Pérez6Marta Serrano Muñoz7Manuel Luque González8Lidia García‐Pérez9Miguel Ángel García‐Bello10Pedro Serrano‐Aguilar11Pedro Raúl Castellano Santana12Laura Vera Álamo13Evaluation Unit (SESCS), Canary Island Health Service Canary Islands Health Research Institute Foundation (FIISC) Tenerife SpainEvaluation Unit (SESCS), Canary Island Health Service Canary Islands Health Research Institute Foundation (FIISC) Tenerife SpainDepartment of Urology University Hospital of Nuestra Señora de Candelaria Tenerife SpainRethink Medical SL Gran Canaria SpainEvaluation Unit (SESCS), Canary Island Health Service Canary Islands Health Research Institute Foundation (FIISC) Tenerife SpainRethink Medical SL Gran Canaria SpainEvaluation Unit (SESCS), Canary Island Health Service Canary Islands Health Research Institute Foundation (FIISC) Tenerife SpainRethink Medical SL Gran Canaria SpainRethink Medical SL Gran Canaria SpainEvaluation Unit (SESCS), Canary Island Health Service Canary Islands Health Research Institute Foundation (FIISC) Tenerife SpainEvaluation Unit (SESCS), Canary Island Health Service Canary Islands Health Research Institute Foundation (FIISC) Tenerife SpainNetwork for Research on Chronicity, Primary Care, and Health Promotion (RICAPPS) Tenerife SpainUniversity of La Laguna (ULL) Tenerife SpainDepartment of Urology Insular University Hospital of Gran Canaria Gran Canaria SpainAbstract Background Foley catheters have been subject to limited development in the last few decades. They fulfil their basic function of draining urine from the bladder but cause other associated problems. T‐Control is a new silicone Foley catheter with an integrated fluid control valve whose design aims to reduce the risks associated with bladder catheterisation by a multifactorial approach. The general purpose of this study is to evaluate the effectiveness and cost‐effectiveness of the T‐Control catheter versus the Foley‐type catheter in patients with Acute Urine Retention (AUR). Study design This is a pragmatic, open, multicentre, controlled clinical trial with random allocation to the T‐Control catheter or a conventional Foley‐type catheter in patients with AUR. Endpoints The magnitude of infections will be analysed as a primary endpoint. While as secondary endpoint, the following will be analysed: rate of symptomatic and asymptomatic infections; days free of infection; quality of life‐related to self‐perceived health; indication of associated antibiotic treatments; determination of biofilm; number of catheter‐related adverse events; use of each type of catheterisation's healthcare resources; level of satisfaction and workload of health professionals and acceptability of the T‐Control device as well as the patient experience. Patients and methods Eligible patients are male adults aged ≥50 years, with AUR and with an indication of bladder catheterisation for at least 2 weeks. The estimated sample size is 50 patients. Patient follow‐up includes both the time of catheter insertion and its removal or change 2 weeks later, plus 2 weeks after this time when the patient will be called for an in‐depth interview.https://doi.org/10.1002/bco2.285acute urine retentioncatheterisationcost‐effectivenessFoleyquality of lifestudy protocol
spellingShingle Yolanda Ramallo‐Fariña
Ana Toledo Chávarri
Adrián Amador Robayna
Max Mòdol Vidal
Cristina Valcárcel‐Nazco
Clara Armas Moreno
Lilisbeth Perestelo‐Pérez
Marta Serrano Muñoz
Manuel Luque González
Lidia García‐Pérez
Miguel Ángel García‐Bello
Pedro Serrano‐Aguilar
Pedro Raúl Castellano Santana
Laura Vera Álamo
Effectiveness of the T‐Control catheter: A study protocol
BJUI Compass
acute urine retention
catheterisation
cost‐effectiveness
Foley
quality of life
study protocol
title Effectiveness of the T‐Control catheter: A study protocol
title_full Effectiveness of the T‐Control catheter: A study protocol
title_fullStr Effectiveness of the T‐Control catheter: A study protocol
title_full_unstemmed Effectiveness of the T‐Control catheter: A study protocol
title_short Effectiveness of the T‐Control catheter: A study protocol
title_sort effectiveness of the t control catheter a study protocol
topic acute urine retention
catheterisation
cost‐effectiveness
Foley
quality of life
study protocol
url https://doi.org/10.1002/bco2.285
work_keys_str_mv AT yolandaramallofarina effectivenessofthetcontrolcatheterastudyprotocol
AT anatoledochavarri effectivenessofthetcontrolcatheterastudyprotocol
AT adrianamadorrobayna effectivenessofthetcontrolcatheterastudyprotocol
AT maxmodolvidal effectivenessofthetcontrolcatheterastudyprotocol
AT cristinavalcarcelnazco effectivenessofthetcontrolcatheterastudyprotocol
AT claraarmasmoreno effectivenessofthetcontrolcatheterastudyprotocol
AT lilisbethperesteloperez effectivenessofthetcontrolcatheterastudyprotocol
AT martaserranomunoz effectivenessofthetcontrolcatheterastudyprotocol
AT manuelluquegonzalez effectivenessofthetcontrolcatheterastudyprotocol
AT lidiagarciaperez effectivenessofthetcontrolcatheterastudyprotocol
AT miguelangelgarciabello effectivenessofthetcontrolcatheterastudyprotocol
AT pedroserranoaguilar effectivenessofthetcontrolcatheterastudyprotocol
AT pedroraulcastellanosantana effectivenessofthetcontrolcatheterastudyprotocol
AT lauraveraalamo effectivenessofthetcontrolcatheterastudyprotocol